On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 12:39 +0200, Dan Vratil wrote:
> KDE still uses ~/.kde quite a lot - nearly all apps that are part of KDE
> distribution have their configuration and tmp folders there.
>
> Also, some distributions prefer ~/.kde4 (for historical reasons to avoid
> conflict with ~/.kde used
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 13:28 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote:
> > The 3.4.x behaviour is very reasonable, but it would be nice if there
> > were some way to explicitly whitelist additional directories.
> >
>
> The best way to get something like that included would be to file a bug
> in Bugzilla and mark it
>
> The 3.4.x behaviour is very reasonable, but it would be nice if there
> were some way to explicitly whitelist additional directories.
>
The best way to get something like that included would be to file a bug
in Bugzilla and mark it as an enhancement or feature request (or
whatever it's labe
On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 10:01 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> does the file actually exist in that directory?
Yes, both the path and the file are valid.
> thus it seems like either a bug in evolution with the error printing or
> your plugin duplicates a prefix of the file in the path, because the
> two
On Saturday 23 of June 2012 16:44:45 Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 21:10 +0200, Jacob Nielsen wrote:
> > Fair enough. But I get no indication at all in the GUI that the
> > attachments were skipped.
>
> You will in 3.4. It was considered a security issue that came up during
> 3.3
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 21:27 +0200, Jacob Nielsen wrote:
> For the record I first tried moving it into one of the XDG dirs, but
> that doesn't work:
>
> "composer-Message: Skipping suspicious attachment:
> /home/snobel/.cache/kde/tmp-limoncello/kipiplugin-sendimagesDA8UIj/home/snobel/.cache/kde/tm
I've found a temporary work-around in unhiding the .kde directory and
setting the KDEHOME env var accordingly.
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 06:38 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > Will Evolution accept any path in $XDG_CACHE_HOME?
>
> Yeah, $XDG_DATA_HOME, $XDG_CACHE_HOME and $XDG_CONFIG_HOME are truste
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 06:38 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 09:00 +0200, Jacob Nielsen wrote:
> > I'm not a KDE user myself, only use select KDE apps. But if they
> > don't, they should.
> > Will Evolution accept any path in $XDG_CACHE_HOME?
>
> Yeah, $XDG_DATA_HOME, $XDG_CAC
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 09:00 +0200, Jacob Nielsen wrote:
> I'm not a KDE user myself, only use select KDE apps. But if they
> don't, they should.
> Will Evolution accept any path in $XDG_CACHE_HOME?
Yeah, $XDG_DATA_HOME, $XDG_CACHE_HOME and $XDG_CONFIG_HOME are trusted.
Any other hidden directory
Thanks for answering.
On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 16:44 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > And is it possible to convince Evolution that stuff in .kde is not
> > suspicious?
>
> It would have to be patched in.
OK, If there's no easy whitelist in Evolution I'll try to fix it in the digiKam
plugin.
>
On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 21:10 +0200, Jacob Nielsen wrote:
> Fair enough. But I get no indication at all in the GUI that the
> attachments were skipped.
You will in 3.4. It was considered a security issue that came up during
3.3 development, so the filename blacklist was backported to 3.2 without
i
Hi,
I've just replaced an Ubuntu 10.10 installation with Ubuntu 12.04. Now,
when attempting to email photos from digiKam with the SendImages plugin
I get the mail composer window as expected, but no attached photos. When
running digiKam in a terminal I see this:
"composer-Message: Skipping suspic
12 matches
Mail list logo
