On Saturday 23 of June 2012 16:44:45 Matthew Barnes wrote: > On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 21:10 +0200, Jacob Nielsen wrote: > > Fair enough. But I get no indication at all in the GUI that the > > attachments were skipped. > > You will in 3.4. It was considered a security issue that came up during > 3.3 development, so the filename blacklist was backported to 3.2 without > introducing any new translatable (read: user-visible) messages. > > > And is it possible to convince Evolution that stuff in .kde is not > > suspicious? > > It would have to be patched in. > > Not being a KDE user, how widely is ~/.kde still used? I thought KDE > complied with the XDG base directory specification it helped write, or > is ~/.kde a legacy directory analogous to GNOME's ~/.gnome2 ?
Hi, KDE still uses ~/.kde quite a lot - nearly all apps that are part of KDE distribution have their configuration and tmp folders there. Also, some distributions prefer ~/.kde4 (for historical reasons to avoid conflict with ~/.kde used by KDE 3 which is incompatible with KDE 4 configs), so if you are going to whitelist ~/.kde (used by Fedora), please add ~/.kde4 (used by ArchLinux for instance) too. Dan > > Matthew Barnes > > _______________________________________________ > evolution-list mailing list > evolution-list@gnome.org > To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list -- dvra...@redhat.com | Evolution developer GPG Key: 0xC59D614F6F4AE348 Fingerprint: 4EC1 86E3 C54E 0B39 5FDD B5FB C59D 614F 6F4A E348
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
