Thanks for answering. On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 16:44 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
> > And is it possible to convince Evolution that stuff in .kde is not > > suspicious? > > It would have to be patched in. OK, If there's no easy whitelist in Evolution I'll try to fix it in the digiKam plugin. > Not being a KDE user, how widely is ~/.kde still used? I thought KDE > complied with the XDG base directory specification it helped write, or > is ~/.kde a legacy directory analogous to GNOME's ~/.gnome2 ? I'm not a KDE user myself, only use select KDE apps. But if they don't, they should. Will Evolution accept any path in $XDG_CACHE_HOME? Jacob Nielsen
_______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
