Re: [Evolution] Need focus on Exchange (was Re: CalDAV - any successes out there)

2007-04-02 Thread Per Nystrom
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 22:51 -0700, P Chenthill wrote: > You can do the following to fix the problem. Get the patch for timezone > update from http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=83954. You can > apply the patch in you install area where the timezone information for > evolution-data-server

Re: [Evolution] Need focus on Exchange (was Re: CalDAV - any successes out there)

2007-03-06 Thread P Chenthill
Hi Nystrom, On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 10:12 -0800, Per Nystrom wrote: > On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 04:46 -0700, Veerapuram Varadhan wrote: > > > Not sure of your metrics. If you are going by the amount of commits in > > the evolution-exchange module in SVN - your metrics are wrong. > > I was going by th

Re: [Evolution] Need focus on Exchange (was Re: CalDAV - any successes out there)

2007-03-06 Thread Paul Smith
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 08:29 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote: > On 2/26/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I like a lot of the changes to evo that I've seen in 2.8.3. I might > > even try to run 2.9.x if I can find SRPMs that compile on my box before > > resorting to a downgrade. But the b

Re: [Evolution] Need focus on Exchange (was Re: CalDAV - any successes out there)

2007-03-06 Thread Per Nystrom
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 04:46 -0700, Veerapuram Varadhan wrote: > Not sure of your metrics. If you are going by the amount of commits in > the evolution-exchange module in SVN - your metrics are wrong. I was going by the bugs opened and resolved in the Evolution Connector section of bugzilla.gnome

Re: [Evolution] Need focus on Exchange (was Re: CalDAV - any successes out there)

2007-02-28 Thread Veerapuram Varadhan
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 08:29 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote: > On 2/26/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I like a lot of the changes to evo that I've seen in 2.8.3. I might > > even try to run 2.9.x if I can find SRPMs that compile on my box before > > resorting to a downgrade. But the b

Re: [Evolution] Need focus on Exchange (was Re: CalDAV - any successes out there)

2007-02-27 Thread Peter Van Lone
On 2/26/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like a lot of the changes to evo that I've seen in 2.8.3. I might > even try to run 2.9.x if I can find SRPMs that compile on my box before > resorting to a downgrade. But the bottom line is I need to be able to > do my day-to-day work also,

Re: [Evolution] Need focus on Exchange (was Re: CalDAV - any successes out there)

2007-02-26 Thread Veerapuram Varadhan
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 07:35 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote: > On 2/26/07, Veerapuram Varadhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What all features/functionalities that you use extensively in Exchange? > > calendar: > > issues: > currently if our schedulers add an item to my calendar, I can't see it >

Re: [Evolution] Need focus on Exchange (was Re: CalDAV - any successes out there)

2007-02-26 Thread Peter Van Lone
On 2/26/07, Veerapuram Varadhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What all features/functionalities that you use extensively in Exchange? calendar: issues: currently if our schedulers add an item to my calendar, I can't see it until I restart evo can't view another users schedule (subscribe to that u

Re: [Evolution] Need focus on Exchange (was Re: CalDAV - any successes out there)

2007-02-26 Thread Veerapuram Varadhan
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 14:54 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: > On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 18:17 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote: > > On 2/16/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > There are a lot of variables not accounted for here, but the dropoff in > > > closure rate after 2.6.0 is still

Re: [Evolution] Need focus on Exchange (was Re: CalDAV - any successes out there)

2007-02-26 Thread Veerapuram Varadhan
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 18:17 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote: > On 2/16/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > There are a lot of variables not accounted for here, but the dropoff in > > closure rate after 2.6.0 is still pretty dramatic. > > I find that pretty amazing. The connector project

Re: [Evolution] Need focus on Exchange (was Re: CalDAV - any successes out there)

2007-02-26 Thread Harish Krishnaswamy
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 18:17 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote: > On 2/16/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > There are a lot of variables not accounted for here, but the dropoff in > > closure rate after 2.6.0 is still pretty dramatic. > > I find that pretty amazing. The connector project

Re: [Evolution] Need focus on Exchange (was Re: CalDAV - any successes out there)

2007-02-25 Thread Reid Thompson
Peter Van Lone wrote: > On 2/16/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> There are a lot of variables not accounted for here, but the dropoff in >> closure rate after 2.6.0 is still pretty dramatic. >> > > I find that pretty amazing. The connector project has the "feel" of > not bein

Re: [Evolution] Need focus on Exchange (was Re: CalDAV - any successes out there)

2007-02-25 Thread Peter Van Lone
On 2/16/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are a lot of variables not accounted for here, but the dropoff in > closure rate after 2.6.0 is still pretty dramatic. I find that pretty amazing. The connector project has the "feel" of not being high priority, and this just validates i

[Evolution] Need focus on Exchange (was Re: CalDAV - any successes out there)

2007-02-25 Thread Per Nystrom
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 09:02 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote: > On 2/16/07, Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > While I understand the need for an Exchange client > > under Linux, I can't help wondering how much this distracts developer > > attention from the rest of Evo. > > >From th