On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 22:51 -0700, P Chenthill wrote:
> You can do the following to fix the problem. Get the patch for timezone
> update from http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=83954. You can
> apply the patch in you install area where the timezone information for
> evolution-data-server
Hi Nystrom,
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 10:12 -0800, Per Nystrom wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 04:46 -0700, Veerapuram Varadhan wrote:
>
> > Not sure of your metrics. If you are going by the amount of commits in
> > the evolution-exchange module in SVN - your metrics are wrong.
>
> I was going by th
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 08:29 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 2/26/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I like a lot of the changes to evo that I've seen in 2.8.3. I might
> > even try to run 2.9.x if I can find SRPMs that compile on my box before
> > resorting to a downgrade. But the b
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 04:46 -0700, Veerapuram Varadhan wrote:
> Not sure of your metrics. If you are going by the amount of commits in
> the evolution-exchange module in SVN - your metrics are wrong.
I was going by the bugs opened and resolved in the Evolution Connector
section of bugzilla.gnome
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 08:29 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 2/26/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I like a lot of the changes to evo that I've seen in 2.8.3. I might
> > even try to run 2.9.x if I can find SRPMs that compile on my box before
> > resorting to a downgrade. But the b
On 2/26/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like a lot of the changes to evo that I've seen in 2.8.3. I might
> even try to run 2.9.x if I can find SRPMs that compile on my box before
> resorting to a downgrade. But the bottom line is I need to be able to
> do my day-to-day work also,
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 07:35 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 2/26/07, Veerapuram Varadhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What all features/functionalities that you use extensively in Exchange?
>
> calendar:
>
> issues:
> currently if our schedulers add an item to my calendar, I can't see it
>
On 2/26/07, Veerapuram Varadhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What all features/functionalities that you use extensively in Exchange?
calendar:
issues:
currently if our schedulers add an item to my calendar, I can't see it
until I restart evo
can't view another users schedule (subscribe to that u
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 14:54 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 18:17 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> > On 2/16/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > There are a lot of variables not accounted for here, but the dropoff in
> > > closure rate after 2.6.0 is still
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 18:17 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 2/16/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > There are a lot of variables not accounted for here, but the dropoff in
> > closure rate after 2.6.0 is still pretty dramatic.
>
> I find that pretty amazing. The connector project
On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 18:17 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 2/16/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > There are a lot of variables not accounted for here, but the dropoff in
> > closure rate after 2.6.0 is still pretty dramatic.
>
> I find that pretty amazing. The connector project
Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 2/16/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> There are a lot of variables not accounted for here, but the dropoff in
>> closure rate after 2.6.0 is still pretty dramatic.
>>
>
> I find that pretty amazing. The connector project has the "feel" of
> not bein
On 2/16/07, Per Nystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are a lot of variables not accounted for here, but the dropoff in
> closure rate after 2.6.0 is still pretty dramatic.
I find that pretty amazing. The connector project has the "feel" of
not being high priority, and this just validates i
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 09:02 -0600, Peter Van Lone wrote:
> On 2/16/07, Patrick O'Callaghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > While I understand the need for an Exchange client
> > under Linux, I can't help wondering how much this distracts developer
> > attention from the rest of Evo.
>
> >From th
14 matches
Mail list logo