On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 15:20 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
> murn,
>
> Am Freitag, den 18.11.2005, 14:20 +0100 schrieb guenther:
> > > For 2.6 (??)
> >
> > 2.4.2, IMHO. This is a regression from any previous version. And only a
> > minor UI change, so it should be safe to include back in ASAP.
>
>
> > But then again, when forwarding inline, although you would be able to
> > edit your mail, you still would *not* have any attachments that were a
> > part of the original. This cant be done, as per the RFC
>
> That's fine with me. 99% of the time when wanting to forward inline it
> a single t
murn,
Am Freitag, den 18.11.2005, 14:20 +0100 schrieb guenther:
> > For 2.6 (??)
>
> 2.4.2, IMHO. This is a regression from any previous version. And only a
> minor UI change, so it should be safe to include back in ASAP.
if this would be included into 2.4.2, it would break the translation, so
t
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 12:35 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
>
> But then again, when forwarding inline, although you would be able to
> edit your mail, you still would *not* have any attachments that were a
> part of the original. This cant be done, as per the RFC
That's fine with me. 99% o
> > I dont know why the option was removed from the menu and stuff. IMHO
> > should be there. So Forward should have options (Forward Inline or
> > Forward as attachment), so that the user need not change the setting
> > each time.
>
> Cheers. Amen brother. Hip-hip-hooray. Whatever I have to d
> I dont know why the option was removed from the menu and stuff. IMHO
> should be there. So Forward should have options (Forward Inline or
> Forward as attachment), so that the user need not change the setting
> each time.
>
> For 2.6 (??)
2.4.2, IMHO. This is a regression from any previous ver
>(my original mail and your reply edited for length)
>
> On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 13:06 +0100, guenther wrote:
> [The part with two > > is from my original posting, GNR]
> > >The problem with forwarding mail as an attachment is that
> > > you don't get to edit it. This is unacceptable when
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 12:35 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 01:58 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 12:18 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> > > I dont know why the option was removed from the menu and stuff. IMHO
> > > should be there. So Forwa
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 01:58 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 12:18 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> > I dont know why the option was removed from the menu and stuff. IMHO
> > should be there. So Forward should have options (Forward Inline or
> > Forward as attachment), so
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 12:18 +0530, Parthasarathi Susarla wrote:
> I dont know why the option was removed from the menu and stuff. IMHO
> should be there. So Forward should have options (Forward Inline or
> Forward as attachment), so that the user need not change the setting
> each time.
Cheers. A
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 00:12 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > > > take a look at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262601#c6 for
> > > > the reasons.
> > >
> > > Different bug. Especially comment #6 just explains, why forwarding
> > > quoted or inline does not include the attachments.
> >
> > hm
> > > take a look at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262601#c6 for
> > > the reasons.
> >
> > Different bug. Especially comment #6 just explains, why forwarding
> > quoted or inline does not include the attachments.
>
> hmm. after reading it again i have to say: yes, one can also read
good evening ladies and gentlemen,
Am Mittwoch, den 16.11.2005, 21:22 +0100 schrieb guenther:
> > take a look at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262601#c6 for
> > the reasons.
>
> Different bug. Especially comment #6 just explains, why forwarding
> quoted or inline does not include the
Dear Guenther and list
(my original mail and your reply edited for length)
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 13:06 +0100, guenther wrote:
[The part with two > > is from my original posting, GNR]
> > Dear Guenther and list,
> >The problem with forwarding mail as an attachment is that
> > you don't get t
> > > It does seem to be a retrograde step that you can't over-ride the
> > > forwarding style at the time you do the forwarding - anyone any idea why
> > > it was changed?
> >
> > This very likely was removed during the massive menu structure changes.
> > *sigh* I do hope, this is just an oversi
heho guenther,
Am Mittwoch, den 16.11.2005, 18:48 +0100 schrieb guenther:
> > It does seem to be a retrograde step that you can't over-ride the
> > forwarding style at the time you do the forwarding - anyone any idea why
> > it was changed?
>
> This very likely was removed during the massive menu
> > It does seem to be a retrograde step that you can't over-ride the
> > forwarding style at the time you do the forwarding - anyone any idea why
> > it was changed?
>
> Not so good. :/
>
> This very likely was removed during the massive menu structure changes.
> *sigh* I do hope, this is just
> > Regarding forwarding: I do use "forward attached" exclusively, and I
> > believe this is the way to go. Nonetheless I think at least having the
> > options around as in 2.2 and previous versions is just fine, and they
> > should not be removed. Unfortunately I don't recall if this actually
> >
> Regarding forwarding: I do use "forward attached" exclusively, and I
> believe this is the way to go. Nonetheless I think at least having the
> options around as in 2.2 and previous versions is just fine, and they
> should not be removed. Unfortunately I don't recall if this actually
> vanished
> Dear Guenther and list,
>The problem with forwarding mail as an attachment is that
> you don't get to edit it. This is unacceptable when dealing
> with personal matters and so I do not want it to be my default.
> This may be a feature that is needed in a business environment,
> but not for
Dear Guenther and list,
The problem with forwarding mail as an attachment is that
you don't get to edit it. This is unacceptable when dealing
with personal matters and so I do not want it to be my default.
This may be a feature that is needed in a business environment,
but not for personal use.
> Re the problem I reported on Friday forwarding mail
> with embedded images (original posting below):
>It works fine in 2.0.2 if one uses "Forward As-->Attached".
> It doesn't seem to me that this should be necessary.
Preferences / Composer Preferences / General / Forward style: Attachment
hi george,
Am Montag, den 07.11.2005, 11:00 -0500 schrieb George Reeke:
> Re the problem I reported on Friday forwarding mail
> with embedded images (original posting below):
>It works fine in 2.0.2 if one uses "Forward As-->Attached".
> It doesn't seem to me that this should be necessary.
> I
please let me know.
Thanks,
George Reeke
My previous Message ----
Subject: [Evolution] Forwarding mail with embedded images
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 10:48:19 -0500
We are using Evolution 2.0.2 as distributed with CentOS.
When forwarding an email with embedded image(s), the recipient
does
> > > We are using Evolution 2.0.2 as distributed with CentOS.
> > > When forwarding an email with embedded image(s), the recipient
> > > does not get the images, only the text. Is there a setting to
> > > allow the images to be forwarded? Is this fixed in later
> > > versions of Evolution? If
On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 17:25 +0100, guenther wrote:
> > We are using Evolution 2.0.2 as distributed with CentOS.
> > When forwarding an email with embedded image(s), the recipient
> > does not get the images, only the text. Is there a setting to
> > allow the images to be forwarded? Is this fixed
> We are using Evolution 2.0.2 as distributed with CentOS.
> When forwarding an email with embedded image(s), the recipient
> does not get the images, only the text. Is there a setting to
> allow the images to be forwarded? Is this fixed in later
> versions of Evolution? If neither, I will be h
We are using Evolution 2.0.2 as distributed with CentOS.
When forwarding an email with embedded image(s), the recipient
does not get the images, only the text. Is there a setting to
allow the images to be forwarded? Is this fixed in later
versions of Evolution? If neither, I will be happy to sub
28 matches
Mail list logo
