Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-09-08 Thread Thomas Novin
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 09:23 +0530, Johnny Jacob wrote: > On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 14:20 +0200, Thomas Novin wrote: > > To help with this problem, isn't it possible for the developers to build > > packages and have them uploaded to ppa.launchpad.net[1]? > > Packages are available in openSUSE build ser

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-07-09 Thread R Daly
Johnny Jacob-2 wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 10:56 -0700, R Daly wrote: >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p18345271/evo-crash-2.txt This is just from >> trying to refresh my Deleted Items folder after I attempted to expunge. > > Thanks a lot for the information. My pleasure. Glad I can help w

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-07-09 Thread R Daly
Johnny Jacob-2 wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 10:56 -0700, R Daly wrote: >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p18345271/evo-crash-2.txt This is just from >> trying to refresh my Deleted Items folder after I attempted to expunge. > > Thanks a lot for the information. My pleasure. Glad I can help w

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-07-09 Thread R Daly
Johnny Jacob-2 wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 10:56 -0700, R Daly wrote: >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p18345271/evo-crash-2.txt This is just from >> trying to refresh my Deleted Items folder after I attempted to expunge. > > Thanks a lot for the information. My pleasure. Glad I can help w

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-07-09 Thread Johnny Jacob
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 10:56 -0700, R Daly wrote: > http://www.nabble.com/file/p18345271/evo-crash-2.txt This is just from > trying to refresh my Deleted Items folder after I attempted to expunge. Thanks a lot for the information. Crash 1 : send a message, Evolution crashed. - Fixed Crash 2 : re

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-07-08 Thread R Daly
http://www.nabble.com/file/p18345271/evo-crash-2.txt This is just from trying to refresh my Deleted Items folder after I attempted to expunge. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Evolution-%2B-MAPI-%3D-too-much-hassle-tp16745245p18345271.html Sent from the Gnome Evolution - G

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-07-08 Thread R Daly
Johnny Jacob-2 wrote: > > Did Account Setup succeed for you ? If yes you should be seeing a list > of folders and calendar appointments ... > I managed to get the account setup to succeed. However, when I tried to send a message, Evolution crashed. http://www.nabble.com/file/p18345105/evo-

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-07-01 Thread R Daly
Not sure if this would help, but here are the messages I'm seeing in the window where I started Evolution: : server23 16#; evolution CalDAV Eplugin starting up ... ** (evolution:15824): DEBUG: mailto URL command: evolution --component=mail %s ** (evolution:15824): DEBUG: mailto URL program: evol

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-07-01 Thread R Daly
Johnny Jacob-2 wrote: > > Did Account Setup succeed for you ? If yes you should be seeing a list > of folders and calendar appointments ... > The setup itself did complete; however, I'm not seeing any traffic (using tcpdump) when performing the setup. I have verified that I can get packets a

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-06-30 Thread Johnny Jacob
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 14:23 -0700, R Daly wrote: > > Johnny Jacob-2 wrote: > > > > Hmm, we don't need perl for the provider. Please try this. > > [..] > > Looks like the spec file has some unrelated dependancies. Will fix it. > > > > Thanks ! > > > > Now that I have these RPMs compiled and ins

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-06-30 Thread R Daly
Johnny Jacob-2 wrote: > > Hmm, we don't need perl for the provider. Please try this. > [..] > Looks like the spec file has some unrelated dependancies. Will fix it. > > Thanks ! > Now that I have these RPMs compiled and installed, I started Evolution and tried using a test account. I'm not s

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-06-30 Thread R Daly
Suman Manjunath-2 wrote: > > You can remove the GLib 2.16 dependency if you apply the attached patch. > :-) > > -Suman > > diff -Nupr > evolution-mapi-provider-20080526.0/src/backends/calendar/e-cal-backend-mapi.c > evolution-mapi-provider-20080526.0-mine/src/backends/calendar/e-cal-backend-ma

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-06-28 Thread Suman Manjunath
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Matthew Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 11:12 -0700, R Daly wrote: >> Ooh boy... RHEL 5.2 only has 2.12.3. See below: >> >> : server23 166#; rpm -q glib2 >> glib2-2.12.3-2.fc6 >> >> Any suggestions on a workaround for that? > > Grab a ne

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-06-26 Thread R Daly
Matthew Barnes wrote: > > Grab a newer glib2 package from Fedora 9? No idea if that will work, > but rpm should catch any package conflicts before any damage is done. > Well, I can't really do that or else the RHEL system would fall out of support with Red Hat. I'd need to keep the base pack

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-06-26 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 11:12 -0700, R Daly wrote: > Ooh boy... RHEL 5.2 only has 2.12.3. See below: > > : server23 166#; rpm -q glib2 > glib2-2.12.3-2.fc6 > > Any suggestions on a workaround for that? Grab a newer glib2 package from Fedora 9? No idea if that will work, but rpm should catch any

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-06-26 Thread R Daly
Matthew Barnes wrote: > > Sounds like the MAPI backend needs to update or start using versioned > package dependencies. GIO is a new I/O library in GLib 2.16. > Ooh boy... RHEL 5.2 only has 2.12.3. See below: : server23 166#; rpm -q glib2 glib2-2.12.3-2.fc6 Any suggestions on a workaround

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-06-26 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 06:38 -0700, R Daly wrote: > I haven't had the time yet to look for where gio/gio.h may be. If you read > this prior to another update from me and can point me in the right > direction, I'd appreciate it. Thanks, again! Sounds like the MAPI backend needs to update or start

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-06-26 Thread R Daly
Johnny Jacob-2 wrote: > > Hmm, we don't need perl for the provider. Please try this. > > > --- evolution-mapi-provider.spec 2008-06-26 13:29:46.0 +0530 > +++ evolution-mapi-provider.spec.corrected2008-06-26 08:02:04.0 > +0530 > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ > # norootforbuild >

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-06-25 Thread Johnny Jacob
On Wed, 2008-06-25 at 13:21 -0700, R Daly wrote: > I obtained the latest packages: > evolution-mapi-provider-20080526.0-7.2.src.rpm > libmapi-0.7_PHASER-12.2.src.rpm > samba4-4.0.0alpha3GIT41309dc-23.1.src.rpm > > In trying to compile evolution-mapi-provider, I'm getting the following > dependency

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-06-25 Thread R Daly
I obtained the latest packages: evolution-mapi-provider-20080526.0-7.2.src.rpm libmapi-0.7_PHASER-12.2.src.rpm samba4-4.0.0alpha3GIT41309dc-23.1.src.rpm In trying to compile evolution-mapi-provider, I'm getting the following dependency error: : server23 33#; rpmbuild -ba evolution-mapi-provider.

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-05-15 Thread R Daly
Jacob Johnny wrote: > > Haven't updated the tarballs yet. (You could try out building from > source from EXCHANGE_MAPI_BRANCH) > Is it easy enough for me to build the tarball and place in the SRPM that I've been using? I have no problem trying that out... -- View this message in context: ht

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-05-14 Thread Johnny Jacob
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 13:33 -0700, R Daly wrote: > > R Daly wrote: > > > > > > Jacob Johnny wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 07:50 -0700, R Daly wrote: > >>> Here is the bt from the crash. > >>> > >>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p16962330/evo-bt.txt evo-bt.txt > >> > >> Crash in l

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-05-14 Thread R Daly
R Daly wrote: > > > Jacob Johnny wrote: >> >> >> On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 07:50 -0700, R Daly wrote: >>> Here is the bt from the crash. >>> >>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p16962330/evo-bt.txt evo-bt.txt >> >> Crash in libmapi. hmm .. I'll check it out . >> >> > > I just installed libmapi-d

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-04-30 Thread Pantano Angelo
Angelo > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 9:29 PM > To: evolution-list@gnome.org > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-04-29 Thread R Daly
Jacob Johnny wrote: > > > On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 07:50 -0700, R Daly wrote: >> Here is the bt from the crash. >> >> http://www.nabble.com/file/p16962330/evo-bt.txt evo-bt.txt > > Crash in libmapi. hmm .. I'll check it out . > > I just installed libmapi-debuginfo and generated a new bt. It

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-04-29 Thread Johnny Jacob
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 07:50 -0700, R Daly wrote: > Here is the bt from the crash. > > http://www.nabble.com/file/p16962330/evo-bt.txt evo-bt.txt Crash in libmapi. hmm .. I'll check it out . -- Johnny Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://johnnyjacob.org GPG fingerprint = E296 D0B9 77D9 D968 5574

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-04-29 Thread R Daly
Here is the bt from the crash. http://www.nabble.com/file/p16962330/evo-bt.txt evo-bt.txt -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Evolution-%2B-MAPI-%3D-too-much-hassle-tp16745245p16962330.html Sent from the Gnome Evolution - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-04-29 Thread Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
> >  > When I attempt to authenticate in the Evolution Setup Assistant, I get > a > crash. Bug Buddy captured the bt. I'll upload the output from that. > > Same problem still here as well, even after I have upgraded to the newest rpm-source packages found here: http://download.opensuse.org/r

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-04-29 Thread R Daly
Jacob Johnny wrote: > > Packages are available in openSUSE build service [0]. I've been > sucessfull in building them for openSUSE 10.3 & Fedora 8 ( Evolution > 2.12 ) . > > I would be very happy if somebody is willing to take up resposibility > for building it for Ubuntu / Debian in openSUSE

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-04-29 Thread R Daly
Jacob Johnny wrote: > > >> How difficult would it be to obtain the SRC packages for Evo 2.12 and >> compile them myself? > > If you have the src rpm : rpmbuild --rebuild package-1.0.src.rpm > > RH informed me where I would be able to obtain the -devel packages (in their Beta channel). I'm

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-04-28 Thread Johnny Jacob
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 08:50 -0700, R Daly wrote: > > ritz wrote: > > > > Hello > > > > On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 07:02 -0700, R Daly wrote: > >> > >> Jacob Johnny wrote: > >> > > >> > On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 14:20 +0200, Thomas Novin wrote: > >> >> Hello > >> >> > >> >> Right now I see lots of peo

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-04-28 Thread Johnny Jacob
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 9:29 PM > To: evolution-list@gnome.org > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle > > Hi! > > > I would be very happy if

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-04-28 Thread Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
> This was the output on the console: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ evolution > Loading Exchange MAPI Plugin > > listener is constructed > BBDB spinning up... > camel-mapi-store.c(166):camel_mapi_store_get_type:Reached > Create profile with nieper () uni-mainz > exchange-01.zdv.u

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-04-28 Thread R Daly
ritz wrote: > > Hello > > On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 07:02 -0700, R Daly wrote: >> >> Jacob Johnny wrote: >> > >> > On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 14:20 +0200, Thomas Novin wrote: >> >> Hello >> >> >> >> Right now I see lots of people struggling to get the MAPI plugin to >> >> work. Even more problem tryi

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-04-28 Thread Pantano Angelo
hints? regards Pantano Angelo From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 9:29 PM To: evolution-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle Hi

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-04-25 Thread Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
Hi! > I would be very happy if somebody is willing to take up resposibility > for building it for Ubuntu / Debian in openSUSE Build service (I'm > familiar with Build Service) or anyother repositories. :) > Today, I have installed the openSUSE_Factory rpms on my Ubuntu 8.04 system. It was quit

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-04-21 Thread R Daly
Jacob Johnny wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 14:20 +0200, Thomas Novin wrote: >> Hello >> >> Right now I see lots of people struggling to get the MAPI plugin to >> work. Even more problem trying to get it to work with the current >> version of Evolution, 2.22. >> >> First of all, isn't it str

Re: [Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-04-17 Thread Johnny Jacob
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 14:20 +0200, Thomas Novin wrote: > Hello > > Right now I see lots of people struggling to get the MAPI plugin to > work. Even more problem trying to get it to work with the current > version of Evolution, 2.22. > > First of all, isn't it strange that developers use 2.12 and

[Evolution] Evolution + MAPI = too much hassle

2008-04-17 Thread Thomas Novin
Hello Right now I see lots of people struggling to get the MAPI plugin to work. Even more problem trying to get it to work with the current version of Evolution, 2.22. First of all, isn't it strange that developers use 2.12 and not the latest version (2.22)? 2.12.0 is so old, released 2007-09-17.