Re: [Evolution] Annoying Bug/Teiken

2009-05-08 Thread Alpár Jüttner
> Does Evo use proportional fonts by default? Hmmm. You are right. The "Use the same fonts as other application" is switched on by default. Unfortunately my gnome setting (which I carry on with me largely unmodified by several years) used a proportional font even where a monospace one should have

Re: [Evolution] Annoying Bug/Teiken

2009-05-06 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 07:14 +0100, Alpár Jüttner wrote: > > > > Lots of people suggest this, but I've never heard a satisfactory advice > > > > on what to use instead. Could you tell me how to send someone say a > > > > simple table if not in HTML? In a .doc or .xls file? HTML is at least > > > > s

Re: [Evolution] Annoying Bug/Teiken

2009-05-06 Thread Pete Biggs
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 07:14 +0100, Alpár Jüttner wrote: > > > > Lots of people suggest this, but I've never heard a satisfactory advice > > > > on what to use instead. Could you tell me how to send someone say a > > > > simple table if not in HTML? In a .doc or .xls file? HTML is at least > > > > s

Re: [Evolution] Annoying Bug/Teiken

2009-05-05 Thread Alpár Jüttner
> > Lots of people suggest this, but I've never heard a satisfactory advice > > on what to use instead. Could you tell me how to send someone say a > > simple table if not in HTML? > > > Back in the old days (before HTML. before graphical interfaces) folks > used monospaced fonts. It worked we

Re: [Evolution] Annoying Bug/Teiken

2009-05-05 Thread Alpár Jüttner
> > > Lots of people suggest this, but I've never heard a satisfactory advice > > > on what to use instead. Could you tell me how to send someone say a > > > simple table if not in HTML? In a .doc or .xls file? HTML is at least > > > standardized, cross-platform and directly supported by contempora

Re: [Evolution] Annoying Bug/Teiken

2009-05-05 Thread Reid Thompson
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 14:31 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote: > On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 12:52 +0100, Alpár Jüttner wrote: > > > Brewster chimes in. > > > > > > Whether they realize it or not, it can also be very annoying for > > > their recipients who are among the security-conscious who have their > > >

Re: [Evolution] Annoying Bug/Teiken

2009-05-05 Thread Reid Thompson
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 12:52 +0100, Alpár Jüttner wrote: > > Brewster chimes in. > > > > Whether they realize it or not, it can also be very annoying for > > their recipients who are among the security-conscious who have their > > emailers optioned to *not* translate HTML. > > > > I do not believ

Re: [Evolution] Annoying Bug/Teiken

2009-05-05 Thread Jeff Nelson
Alpár Jüttner wrote: Brewster chimes in. I do not believe HTML should be used in emails. Lots of people suggest this, but I've never heard a satisfactory advice on what to use instead. Could you tell me how to send someone say a simple table if not in HTML? Back in the old days (befo

Re: [Evolution] Annoying Bug/Teiken

2009-05-05 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 12:52 +0100, Alpár Jüttner wrote: > > Brewster chimes in. > > > > Whether they realize it or not, it can also be very annoying for > > their recipients who are among the security-conscious who have their > > emailers optioned to *not* translate HTML. > > > > I do not believ

Re: [Evolution] Annoying Bug/Teiken

2009-05-05 Thread Alpár Jüttner
> Brewster chimes in. > > Whether they realize it or not, it can also be very annoying for > their recipients who are among the security-conscious who have their > emailers optioned to *not* translate HTML. > > I do not believe HTML should be used in emails. Lots of people suggest this, but

Re: [Evolution] Annoying Bug/Teiken

2009-05-01 Thread bg
> > On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 11:13 -0700, Matt Teiken wrote: > > > I have installed Evolution in our small office, but users are coming > > > to me on a regular basis complaining about the same thing: > > > > > > They are storing signatures as HTML, they work fine, UNTIL they close > > > and re-open