On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 12:52 +0100, Alpár Jüttner wrote: > > Brewster chimes in. > > > > Whether they realize it or not, it can also be very annoying for > > their recipients who are among the security-conscious who have their > > emailers optioned to *not* translate HTML. > > > > I do not believe HTML should be used in emails. > > Lots of people suggest this, but I've never heard a satisfactory advice > on what to use instead. Could you tell me how to send someone say a > simple table if not in HTML? In a .doc or .xls file? HTML is at least > standardized, cross-platform and directly supported by contemporary mail > clients and web-mail services.
Security vs comfort. There are valid reasons for using HTML in email, it's just that they don't apply in 99% of the messages one sees. And they *never* apply to messages on mailing lists such as this one. poc _______________________________________________ Evolution-list mailing list Evolution-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
