Re: [Evolution] trash recovery

2010-06-09 Thread Paul Leyland
> I hope somebody can help here. I currently have Evolution 2.10.1 > running under Freespire OS. My problem is this: > i've recently deleted some important emails, problem is, I didn't > notice they'd gone until after i'd emptied the trash can. > Is there any way of recovering these files? The e

Re: [Evolution] Error sending mail --- no provider for protocol 'file' --- solved!

2010-04-16 Thread Paul Leyland
(Apologies for outside-posting 8-) A couple of months ago I complained: > After clicking Send, a yellow ! triangle appears, clicking on which > produces a message which states: > Failed to append to file:///home/pcl/evolution/local/Sent: > No provider available for protocol 'file' > Appending to

Re: [Evolution] Automatic encryption on Reply

2010-03-27 Thread Paul Leyland
O > Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 12:03:06 -0430 > From: Patrick O'Callaghan > To: evolution-list@gnome.org > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Automatic encryption on Reply > Message-ID: <1269621186.29722.68.ca...@bree.homelinux.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 16:57 +0

Re: [Evolution] IMAP vs. POP

2010-03-18 Thread Paul Leyland
> Quite a few valid reasons for IMAP. Except. In my situation, I don't > need backup by an administrator, I'm him. All the accounts on my single > machine are from only two hosts. I don't need auto vacation messages. > I keep my folders quite small in size/number of messages. I have a huge > d

[Evolution] Error sending mail --- no provider for protocol 'file'

2010-02-23 Thread Paul Leyland
A few weeks ago my installation of Evo started generating an error when sending mail --- for no obvious reason. Evo itself wasn't changed so I suspect that a third party is to blame. After clicking Send, a yellow ! triangle appears, clicking on which produces a message which states: Failed to ap

Re: [Evolution] Automatic GPG encryption

2009-10-15 Thread Paul Leyland
> El jue, 15-10-2009 a las 20:58 +0100, Paul Leyland escribi?: > > > This is probably a FAQ though I haven't yet found the answer anywhere. > > > > How can I configure Evolution so that it *always* encrypts to the GPG > > key of the recipients of the mail I

[Evolution] Automatic GPG encryption

2009-10-15 Thread Paul Leyland
This is probably a FAQ though I haven't yet found the answer anywhere. How can I configure Evolution so that it *always* encrypts to the GPG key of the recipients of the mail I send? It's easy to see how to set it always to sign with GPG and/or SMIME and always to encrypt SMIME mail. Is there a

Re: [Evolution] I know it's not about Evolution, but...

2009-08-07 Thread Paul Leyland
> Is there an application that I can install on the mailserver and that > will be able to, for example, listen on port 125 and then resend the > traffic to the same localhost at port 25? Then I only have to change > the > port for SMTP on Evolution to port 125 instead of 25. Doesn't ssh port forw

[Evolution] Saving PGP / GPG password

2008-08-22 Thread Paul Leyland
I'm running 2.0.2 on my office box and just migrated from a very elderly home system running Evo 1.something to an AMD64 Gentoo box running 2.22.2 In all cases the default security level is/was to sign messages before sending. Both of the old versions had a check box for saving the pass phrase fo

Re: [Evolution] Evolution-list Digest, Vol 25, Issue 21

2007-08-21 Thread Paul Leyland
> Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:52:30 +1000 > From: Daniel Kasak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I agree with Patrick on the issues that editing incoming email raises. > If you *ever* want to use email in court, you'd better not let anyone > find out that you're able to do this, because it will co

Re: [Evolution] Evolution not working - can't find a solution!

2006-06-01 Thread Paul Leyland
gt; If I add back only the original .gconf/apps/evolution folder the > result is the same - no warning message but no mail and no custom > folders. > > If I add back only the original .evolution folder I get my mail and > custom folders but also the warning message and the problem

[Evolution] Can't save new Calendar

2006-05-02 Thread Paul Leyland
system permissions and so forth --- no noticeable difference (other than ownership being appropriate to the account holder, of course). Does anyone have any suggestions for a fix or for what I should check next? Thanks, Paul -- Paul Leyland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>| Hanging on i

[Evolution] Re: Reading GPG-encrypted mail

2006-04-19 Thread Paul Leyland
x27;t have pedantically correct headers or something. Here's the mail with personal information and Received: removed. Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:03:42 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060111) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Leyland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Evolution] Reading GPG-encrypted mail

2006-04-19 Thread Paul Leyland
Apologies if this has already been answered but I can't find anything about it in the archives. Indeed, I can't find *anything* in the archives. The search page at http://mail.gnome.org/archives/evolution-list/ never ever returns anything to me no matter what search term I enter into the box, eve

[Evolution] Uselessness of attachments in Tasks

2005-12-09 Thread Paul Leyland
I've been unable to find anything on this one in Google or the archives. Scenario: Evolution 2.2.2 / Solaris 9 / Sparc Create a new task then add an attachment to it. Close the task, then re-open it. The attachment is still there, which is good. However, double-clicking the attachment doesn't

Re: [Evolution] Re: somethings wrong

2005-08-31 Thread Paul Leyland
8-30 at 23:19 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: > On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 09:51 +0100, Paul Leyland wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 12:50 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: > > Oh no they haven't. > > > > My subsription was for the digest version, I seem to be get

Re: [Evolution] Re: somethings wrong

2005-08-30 Thread Paul Leyland
On Tue, 2005-08-30 at 12:50 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: > The mailing lists were being migrated from one domain to another. There > were hitches during the switch-over as you have already observed. > They have been fixed now... Oh no they haven't. My subsription was for the digest version