On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 17:31 +, s...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Well, - suddenly everything's gone!! My Inbox, my threads, and
> EVERYTHING! The only thing I did was to log out, turn off my
> computer
> and turning it on later on.
[Please don't top-post on the list, it annoys a lot of people]
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 17:31 +, s...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> Well, - suddenly everything's gone!! My Inbox, my threads, and
> EVERYTHING! The only thing I did was to log out, turn off my computer
> and turning it on later on.
If you launch Evolution there's no Folder "Inbox"?
Or is there a f
Well, - suddenly everything's gone!! My Inbox, my threads, and
EVERYTHING! The only thing I did was to log out, turn off my computer
and turning it on later on.
OMG! I'd better stay in my terminal for now, sending mails the way I
used to do. You've been patient, and again thanks for all your h
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 16:07 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> I mean, I've tried gpg --encrypt --sign --armor -r per...@email.com
> name_of_file, but does it have to be an armor file?
If you are sending things by email, then use an armored file - it will
make sure things get through all email sy
I mean, I've tried gpg --encrypt --sign --armor -r per...@email.com
name_of_file, but does it have to be an armor file?
SRW
fr. den 05. 02. 2016 klokka 09.27 (-0500) skreiv Adam Tauno Williams:
> On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 15:06 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> > It seems like I manage to send sign
Oh great! Woah! Actually it seems like everything is about perfect now!
Can I ask one more favour concerning the encryption AND the signing? How
would that look in the terminal? I'm very guilty in that odd use-case of
encrypting without signing. So the command line would fully look
like ...?
SRW
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 15:06 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> It seems like I manage to send signed emails. Not sure about he
> encryption yet. But it seems like I cannot encrypt and sign at the
> same time. I get an error message when I try that.
I received and could read your encrypted message
fr. den 05. 02. 2016 klokka 13.30 (+) skreiv Patrick O'Callaghan:
> On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 14:01 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> > Great! That's what I was thinking. So, the importation of keys is no
> > problem. I just wondered if that's enough for Evolution. All my
> > contacts
> > are alre
fr. den 05. 02. 2016 klokka 13.30 (+) skreiv Patrick O'Callaghan:
> On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 14:01 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> > Great! That's what I was thinking. So, the importation of keys is no
> > problem. I just wondered if that's enough for Evolution. All my
> > contacts
> > are alre
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 14:01 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> Great! That's what I was thinking. So, the importation of keys is no
> problem. I just wondered if that's enough for Evolution. All my
> contacts
> are already on my key-ring. I was wondering if Evolution kind of
> looked
> them up from
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 13:56 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> Thanks a lot! I need some time to let all this sink in. After all,
> last
> year I didn't even know what GPG/PGP, GNOME, Linux, terminal or GNU
> are!
> I'm only trying to get my Evolution to work perfectly. I've never
> heard
> of that
On Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:50:04 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 07:24 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
>> I get how to add my own GPG ID, my public key, but how do I add other
>> people's public keys - which I need to send them encrypted letters,
>> yes?
>> Sorry, I'm really n
That's why I was wondering if anyone could be so kind to send me an
encrypted email (7C174863), and I could give a short answer, just to put
this at rest. Then I'd know for sure that my set-up is correct. IF
anyone have the time.
SRW
fr. den 05. 02. 2016 klokka 12.45 (+) skreiv Patrick O'Call
Great! That's what I was thinking. So, the importation of keys is no
problem. I just wondered if that's enough for Evolution. All my contacts
are already on my key-ring. I was wondering if Evolution kind of looked
them up from my key-ring for encryption in Evolution? I was curious if I
had to impor
> So find the executable and execute it using the full path. The
> location of the evolution-calendar-factory file is distro dependent -
> for Fedora it's in /usr/libexec - in all likelihood it's somewhere
> odd
> in Ubuntu.
Ah. Sorry, I should have known that myself.
>
> And you've got it the
Thanks a lot! I need some time to let all this sink in. After all, last
year I didn't even know what GPG/PGP, GNOME, Linux, terminal or GNU are!
I'm only trying to get my Evolution to work perfectly. I've never heard
of that gpg command before or how it works.
Thanks again!
SRW
fr. den 05. 02. 2
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 07:24 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> I get how to add my own GPG ID, my public key, but how do I add other
> people's public keys - which I need to send them encrypted letters,
> yes?
> Sorry, I'm really new to this, both Linux, GNOME, Trisquel and GPG.
> Please, I would l
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 13:15 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> Ah, I think I'm beginning to understand. So this is another form of
> encryption, still using the receiver's public key, and s/he still has
> to use his or her private key to decrypt the message?
It's not *another* form of encryption.
> > OK. The text of the message is not encrypted with a users key; the
> > text of the message is encrypted using a symmetric key - the key for
> > *that* method (the session key) is encrypted using public keys, and,
> > the important bit, there can be multiple public key encryptions in one
> > m
Thank you for all your patience and help! If any of you have the time to
help me check if everything is OK now, my ID is 7C174863. Send me a test
message, and I send a short test message back. Only to see if everything
is set up perfectly.
Thank you so much!
SRW
fr. den 05. 02. 2016 klokka 12.07
fr. den 05. 02. 2016 klokka 12.07 (+) skreiv Pete Biggs:
> On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 12:41 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> > I really don't understand why I can read a message if it's encrypted
> > with their public key. I shouldn't be able to do that. When I use gpg -r
> > ID -e , I can't read
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 12:41 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> I really don't understand why I can read a message if it's encrypted
> with their public key. I shouldn't be able to do that. When I use gpg -r
> ID -e , I can't read that gpg-file after. So am I encrypting my
> emails in here with my o
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 12:41 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> I really don't understand why I can read a message if it's encrypted
> with their public key. I shouldn't be able to do that. When I use gpg
> -r ID -e , I can't read that gpg-file after. So am I encrypting
> my emails in here with my
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 12:27 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> fr. den 05. 02. 2016 klokka 09.30 (+) skreiv Pete Biggs:
> > On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 07:00 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> > > Also, after I sent it, I could open it and read it using my own
> > > password. When I'm encrypting let
I really don't understand why I can read a message if it's encrypted
with their public key. I shouldn't be able to do that. When I use gpg -r
ID -e , I can't read that gpg-file after. So am I encrypting my
emails in here with my own public key? All my contact's public keys are
imported and added to
fr. den 05. 02. 2016 klokka 09.30 (+) skreiv Pete Biggs:
> On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 07:00 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> > It seems like Evolution is up an running (even though it seldom sends my
> > emails). Another problem is signing and encrypting. Concerning the
> > latter, I don't know if
> > Run evolution-calendar-factory in a terminal with something like
> > CALDAV_DEBUG={all|message:body|message:header|message|items|attachme
> > nt
> > s} evolution-calendar-factory >& logfileMultiple options can be
> > specified as a comma-separated list.
>
> I tried:
> $ evolution-calendar-fa
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 07:00 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
> It seems like Evolution is up an running (even though it seldom sends my
> emails). Another problem is signing and encrypting. Concerning the
> latter, I don't know if my emails are encrypted with the receivers
> public key, or mine. I
28 matches
Mail list logo
