Re: [Evolution] Mail shows new messages but I cannot see them

2015-03-14 Thread Andre Klapper
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:45 -0400, Glenn Gay wrote: > I sent messages to my email account. I get indications of unread > messages in Evolution, but I cannot see the messages. https://help.gnome.org/users/evolution/stable/mail-cannot-see.html Cheers, andre -- Andre Klapper | ak...@gmx.net http:

Re: [Evolution] Mail shows new messages but I cannot see them

2015-03-14 Thread Ralf Mardorf
PS: Did you sort by "Received"? ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Re: [Evolution] Mail shows new messages but I cannot see them

2015-03-14 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:45 -0400, Glenn Gay wrote: > I sent messages to my email account. I get indications of unread > messages in Evolution, but I cannot see the messages. Can you help me > see these messages? Is anything selected by the "Show" box or an entry in the "Search" field? Is your re

Re: [Evolution] Mail shows new messages but I cannot see them

2015-03-14 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:45 -0400, Glenn Gay wrote: > I sent messages to my email account. I get indications of unread > messages in Evolution, but I cannot see the messages. Can you help me > see these messages? Not without more information. At a minimum, you need to say what version of Evolutio

[Evolution] Mail shows new messages but I cannot see them

2015-03-14 Thread Glenn Gay
I sent messages to my email account. I get indications of unread messages in Evolution, but I cannot see the messages. Can you help me see these messages? ___ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe

Re: [Evolution] [OT] Mailing list filters

2015-03-14 Thread Roy Reese
>> On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 12:02 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: >> On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 09:49 +, Pete Biggs wrote: >> > And I would STRONGLY refute your assertion that HTML is prevalent these >> > days - less than about 5% of the emails I receive (that aren't spam) are >> > HTML. >> >> Same h

Re: [Evolution] [OT] Mailing list filters

2015-03-14 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 12:02 +, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 09:49 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > And I would STRONGLY refute your assertion that HTML is prevalent these > > days - less than about 5% of the emails I receive (that aren't spam) are > > HTML. > > Same here, but

Re: [Evolution] Mailing list filters

2015-03-14 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 09:49 +, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > > I think the OP may have been asking if there is a way to do this > > > differently according to the kind of message. That could be a useful > > > option, e.g. when replying to a list versus a non-list message. > > > > Given that HTM

Re: [Evolution] [OT] Mailing list filters

2015-03-14 Thread Andre Klapper
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 09:51 +0100, Roy Reese wrote: > Given that HTML seems the prevalent form these days Many scholars state, it is believed/regarded, many are of the opinion, most feel, experts declare, it is often reported, it is widely thought, research has shown, science says: --> [Citation

Re: [Evolution] Mailing list filters

2015-03-14 Thread Pete Biggs
> > > > I think the OP may have been asking if there is a way to do this > > differently according to the kind of message. That could be a useful > > option, e.g. when replying to a list versus a non-list message. > > Given that HTML seems the prevalent form these days, in part being the > defa

Re: [Evolution] Mailing list filters

2015-03-14 Thread Roy Reese
>> On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 17:46 +, Justin Musgrove wrote: >> > My apologizes for my ignorance with using an incorrect method. Is there >> > a method in evolution to prompt a different "reply" methods in lieu of >> > the global option? >> >> The default settings for replying and forwarding can be