>> On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 12:02 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 09:49 +0000, Pete Biggs wrote:
>> > And I would STRONGLY refute your assertion that HTML is prevalent these
>> > days - less than about 5% of the emails I receive (that aren't spam) are
>> > HTML.
>>
>> Same here, but I don't know if anyone really knows. Most of my mail in
>> terms of numbers of messages comes through lists such as this one, in
>> which HTML is strongly discouraged. Most of the rest is from people
>> using some kind of webmail, or an app on their phone, and that tends to
>> be in the form of rich text. Not much is HTML aside from marketing.
> 
> Most mails I receive are from Linux and FreeBSD mailing lists and less
> of them are HTML formatted, most are plain text. Most private mails I
> receive from people who aren't geeks, are HTML formatted, less are plain
> text or RTF.
>

OK, I did not mean to set off a firestorm here.

Andre, you're quite right to challenge the generalization -- which goes for the 
"strong challenge as well. It will depend quite a bit on the mix of messages 
and the application one uses for writing them. I receive quite a bit of 
newsletters, so, yes, it is all HTML. I also use web interfaces at times when 
away from my computers, so my sample is skewed. Someone receiving messages 
primarily from listservs and developers certainly sees a different mix as Ralf 
points out.

Patrick, you properly called me out for adding idle chat rather than acting on 
my beliefs. An enhancement request has been filed here:

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746211

Best,
Roy
_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
evolution-list@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list

Reply via email to