On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 09:49 +0000, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > > I think the OP may have been asking if there is a way to do this > > > differently according to the kind of message. That could be a useful > > > option, e.g. when replying to a list versus a non-list message. > > > > Given that HTML seems the prevalent form these days, in part being the > > default for most if not all webmail accounts and perhaps others, I > > would second Patrick's suggestion. > > It's nothing to do with HTML, it's to do with how people deal with the > email they are replying to. The reply style is independent of the > format of email you are replying to.
Exactly. Also, this isn't really my suggestion as I don't care about it. I was merely interpreting what I thought the original request was. Anyone interested should file an RFE on Bugzilla. > And I would STRONGLY refute your assertion that HTML is prevalent these > days - less than about 5% of the emails I receive (that aren't spam) are > HTML. Same here, but I don't know if anyone really knows. Most of my mail in terms of numbers of messages comes through lists such as this one, in which HTML is strongly discouraged. Most of the rest is from people using some kind of webmail, or an app on their phone, and that tends to be in the form of rich text. Not much is HTML aside from marketing. poc _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
