On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 20:52 -0400, Jay Daniels wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 07:12 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > The only way I've figured to handle
> > this is to 'prefer PLAIN' and
>
> I discovered this recently too. Text only simply doesn't work as
> expected.
>
> There is another option but I
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 00:45 +0200, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> Does this mean your merge won't be default in 2.28, but in 3.0?
Correct.
Matthew Barnes
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evol
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 07:12 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> The only way I've figured to handle
> this is to 'prefer PLAIN' and
I discovered this recently too. Text only simply doesn't work as
expected.
There is another option but I have never tried, use a procmail recipe to
strip the html and then se
I'm a recent (re-)convert to Linux (Debian 5.0), and I am coming from
Windows XP and Thunderbird.
One of the things that I used to do in Thunderbird is to have several
incoming folders, and several Address Books. I had rules set up on
incoming mail to say, for instance, if the sender is from my mo
Does this mean your merge won't be default in 2.28, but in 3.0?
___
Evolution-list mailing list
Evolution-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
Sorry. Thought I hit reply all...guess not.
Forwarded Message
From: Patrick O'Callaghan
To: Philippe LeCavalier
Subject: Re: [Evolution] Copying POP to IMAP troubles
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:56:50 -0430
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 11:28 -0400, Philippe LeCavalier wrote:
> Well, al
; folders so that I don't have to poll
> a few dozen rss feeds/mailboxes/newsgroups for new items.
>
> b.
>
> -- next part ------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 197 bytes
> D
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 10:43 -0400, Philippe LeCavalier wrote:
[...]
> P.S. I realize that moving large amounts of folders/mail is prone to
> fail. So I've tried toning down the amount being copied. But even with
> very small amounts of mail (root folder with 10-12 email-->subfolder
> with 10-12 ema
Hi,
I'm having a really hard time moving my mail from a POP local archive to
the IMAP server. Moving messages(1 or many) works fine. Moving single
folders works fine. But moving folders that contains messages OR moving
folders that contain subfolders(also containing messages) fails without
any err
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 08:45 -0400, Reid Thompson wrote:
> will MAPI be building straight out of the evo tree?
> will it still be dependent upon unreleased SAMBA 4?
Yes and yes. No changes to evolution-mapi.
evolution-exchange, on the other hand, is severely broken right now
since it leans heav
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 07:42 -0500, Allen Meyers wrote:
> I had occasion to have to reinstall Lenny but could not locate my USB
> stick that had my backup so I configured without it.
> I apparently was not thinking about how large my address book was.
> I now have the backup file.
> So is there a wa
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 08:02 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 21:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >
> > Your BZ report talks about issues with large newsgroups.
>
> Indeed.
>
> > Are you seeing
> > the same with large mail folders?
>
> I don't have any/enough mail fol
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 07:57 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> > the major difference for end users will be that developers will be
> better able to fix bugs.
will MAPI be building straight out of the evo tree?
will it still be dependent upon unreleased SAMBA 4?
Boils down to two concerns, will I
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 07:57 -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> Well, this is not the only possible difference for end users. If
> developers of extensions (i.e. evolution-rss, evolution-jescs, etc.)
> don't jump on the bandwagon before the GA release of evolution sans
> bonobo, some users will be mi
I had occasion to have to reinstall Lenny but could not locate my USB
stick that had my backup so I configured without it.
I apparently was not thinking about how large my address book was.
I now have the backup file.
So is there a way now using the backup to install my contacts.
Thanks
Allen Me
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 07:32 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> From reading your article, it appears that the major difference for end
> users will be that developers will be better able to fix bugs.
I hope so. And it will let us add some nice enhancements that we've
been blocked on for years. Editable
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 00:49 +0930, Wayne Sierke wrote:
>
> You don't happen to be using a 'Sender or Recipients' condition in your
> problematic vfolders, do you?
Nope. They are just "aggretation" folders so that I don't have to poll
a few dozen rss feeds/mailboxes/newsgroups for new items.
b.
On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 07:32 -0400, Art Alexion wrote:
> Thanks for the explanation, Matthew.
Indeed. Excellent.
> the major difference for end users will be that developers will be better
> able to fix bugs.
Well, this is not the only possible difference for end users. If
developers of exte
Thanks for the explanation, Matthew.
>From reading your article, it appears that the major difference for end users
>will be that developers will be better able to fix bugs. This alone is cause
>for great anticipation. Will there also be performance gains?
--
Art Alexion
MIS/Central Office
19 matches
Mail list logo
