achment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20221125/6b49a935/attachment.htm>
___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
ent.htm>
___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
HELP: http://www.evdl.org/help/
------ next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org
- next part --
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
><http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20221124/b3b78fcd/attachment.htm>
>___
>Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
>No other addresses in
IMHO, battery power for long haul trucking is a piss poor application. Local
delivery, sure, but not long haul.
Electric trains would be a FAR better method for long haul transportation. You
could have two separate train tracks. One for priority goods and passengers,
and one for less time cr
ts with
> >the driver being paid to wait. It is not economic as the trucking company
> >will lose money and it simply will not be done. (Or be done rarely.) EV
> >trucks will no doubt be used for runs that are within their battery range.
> >Bill D.
> >-- next part -
Excellent ideas Robert.
On 11/25/2022 2:33 PM, Robert Johnston via EV wrote:
Okay, I've been looking into/thinking about this for a bit, and I see
several ways this could be handled.
___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO
