Hi,
In the article "Shifting toward Qt":
http://lwn.net/Articles/607563/
One of the mentioned problems is the GTK+ documentation. I don't agree
with that, I think the API is well documented. But what is really
missing is a good and recent book, for an introduction to how to write a
GLib/GTK+ appl
On Sun, 2014-08-17 at 00:46 -0700, Christian Hergert wrote:
> One of the things I'd like to do longer term is integrate tutorials into
> Builder. (And a companion book/pdf to go with). But that is a while out.
That would be great. It's a pity that a week lasts only 7 days. And I
don't think the GT
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:36:01PM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> I think that we should rename the "needs-work" patch status to
> something more positive, and less disheartening for contributors.
>
> "feedback-given" is an alternative which I quite like.
>
> Good idea?
There is already "re
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 06:00:38PM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> No, "reviewed" is "I'd set this as accepted-commit_now" but I'm not the
> maintainer".
Interesting. I was not aware of this meaning. For me "reviewed" was just
"reviewed" in the general sense, and thus was a good alternative for
"re
On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:50:02AM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> FWIW:
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeShell/Development/WorkingWithPatches#How_to_review_a_patch
Makes sense. But it is difficult to know that when working only in
bugzilla. A tooltip could be displayed for each status. But t
Hi Christian,
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 01:12:53PM -0700, Christian Hergert wrote:
> On 08/17/2014 07:15 AM, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> > But even with a perfect toolkit, if there is no good introduction,
> > beginners will anyway learn something else.
>
> If anyone wan
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 10:27:14AM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> > There is one book out there [1], although it's not free.
>
> and if I remember postings on planet.gnome.org around that time
> correctly, reviews were... "mixed".
Yes, there has been a bad review (1/5):
http://blogs.gnome.org/dann
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 09:41:04AM +, Allan Day wrote:
> [1] https://wiki.gnome.org/Events/FOSDEM/2014#feedback
At FOSDEM it's a good idea to target developers and computer science
students. Many stands have flyers describing technically their
technologies (the BSDs stands for example). S
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 04:13:13PM +0100, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 02:01:52PM +0100, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> > If someone wants to write the content, perfect. Otherwise I can write an
> > initial version.
> Cool! Really great. Looking forward to your
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 03:50:54PM +0100, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 03:48:35PM +0100, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> > I've finished an initial version:
> > https://people.gnome.org/~swilmet/gtk-brochure.pdf
> > https://github.com/swilmet/gtk-brochure
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 04:24:05PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> For instance:
> | GTK+ is free software and part of the GNU Project. However, the
> | licensing terms
>
> The "However," is not needed.
fixed.
> Then there are various abbreviations that changed their meaning AFAIK.
> GTK+ does not
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:31:39PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:12:28PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> > GTK+ has been created in 1996 for the GIMP — the
> > GNU Image Manipulation Program — but has quickly
>
> Maybe:
> "- a photo retouching, image composition and image au
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:12:28PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 03:48:35PM +0100, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> > I've finished an initial version:
> > https://people.gnome.org/~swilmet/gtk-brochure.pdf
> > https://github.com/swilmet/gtk-brochure
>
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 02:06:20PM +0100, Oliver Propst wrote:
> It's cool to see initiatives this. Although I understand this is
> document explaining a technical subject thus details are needed I
> still find it very wordy, maybe it would be possible to shorten some
> sections.
In comparison, so
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 05:34:20PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> If there's no other options just tell me and it'll print a few. It would
> be good to know how many we usually hand out.
I can print them.
How many copies?
In colors or black and white?
Sébastien
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 06:04:41PM +0100, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 05:40:08PM +0100, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> > I can print them.
> >
> > How many copies?
> 500 should be more than enough.
>
> > In colors or black and white?
> Well
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 07:51:07PM +0100, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> Release Schedule and Versioning Scheme
>
> Every six months there are new GLib, GObject, GIO, GTK+ and GNOME stable
> releases, around March and September.
I've changed that paragraph, the content is now:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 06:33:07PM +0100, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 06:21:12PM +0100, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> > I was more thinking around 100, but it's probably too few. I don't have
> > a suitable printer, so I'll print that in a shop. But i
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 05:52:35PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> I did a test print just now. It prints fine. The printer isn't perfect,
> it again is a little bit dirty (so you see some marks on part of the
> print).
Ok, thanks for the test.
___
engageme
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 02:17:55PM +0100, Olav Vitters wrote:
> I'll print it somewhere around Thursday afternoon. So please make sure
> no changes are done after e.g. 12.00 UTC. Or tell me up front so I can
> check if I can print later.
The last modification was done Saturday 24, after some comme
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:36:30PM -0800, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> You know just having an IDE is not enough, it would be great if we
> could get someone to write a a book or something on gnome development
The GLib chapter is almost finished:
https://people.gnome.org/~swilmet/glib-gtk-dev-platfo
Hi,
I got involved in GNOME (indirectly) thanks to this blog series:
"Why gnome.org Rocks"
https://blogs.gnome.org/johannes/2010/06/04/why-gnome-org/
At that time I was developing a GTK+ application (LaTeXila), hosted
partly on GitHub and partly on SourceForge. Handling translator
contributions w
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 06:35:38PM +0100, Magdalen Berns wrote:
> > So, by promoting the gnome.org project hosting platform, you'll get more
> > _experienced_ developers that can more easily contribute to other GNOME
> > modules and become core GNOME developers.
> >
>
> I reckon the main thing to
Hi,
The templates
https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Template
https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Template
could be improved:
* "Bugzilla product" is in the Development Resources section, but should
be in Getting in Touch, before the link to "File a bug". Because before
filing a new bug, users must search
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:54:47PM +0100, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Christian Hergert
> wrote:
> > I also find MoinMoin itself to be incredibly lacking.
>
> That seems to be a widespread opinion.
MoinMoin does not bother me. With time I got used to its syntax.
S
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 11:38:31AM +0100, Bastian Ilso wrote:
> The application pages which don't follow
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/Template follows
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Apps/TemplateFancy (covered in
> https://blogs.gnome.org/bastian/2015/05/26/a-pretty-app-wiki-template/).
>
> The apps th
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 12:15:23PM -0800, Christian Hergert wrote:
> On 12/05/2015 04:42 AM, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> > Apps are anyway better browsed with a software center like
> > gnome-software. The wiki pages are there for the useful additional
> > information: links
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:45:50PM -0500, Saumya Dwivedi wrote:
> I am one of the past participants of the Outreachy program and I have been
> working on the responsive design project for the Gnome website. Currently
> the testing instance is hosted in http://wgo-test.gnome.org/ .
>
> I know the w
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:32:17AM -0500, Saumya Dwivedi wrote:
> Thank you for the feedback. I have updated the website with some other bug
> fixes and it would be great if you guys can look over it for the overall
> experience or any other technical mistakes.
> Content, images etc can be changed
29 matches
Mail list logo
