On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 12:15:23PM -0800, Christian Hergert wrote: > On 12/05/2015 04:42 AM, Sébastien Wilmet wrote: > > Apps are anyway better browsed with a software center like > > gnome-software. The wiki pages are there for the useful additional > > information: links to the bugzilla, IRC channel, the git repo, tarballs, > > etc. > > Certainly for people already in our audience. > > But for people that are discovering GNOME through our well designed > applications, it might not be the best way to acquire new users.
Yes, indeed. Then maybe the move from projects.gnome.org to the wiki was a step backward. The consistency would have been achievable on projects.gnome.org too. But it's a Git repo. And when thinking about it, there was much more information on projects.gnome.org. For example for reporting bugs, it was usually explained to search the bugzilla before filing a new bug, with a short explanation of the best practices. For the development section, there was some incentives to contribute, with sentences like "The project development relies on voluntary contributions and everyone is invited to help." So yes, I can understand why the default wiki template is not ideal. Sébastien _______________________________________________ engagement-list mailing list engagement-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
