On Oct 7, 2019, at 2:32 AM, John Mattsson
wrote:
>
> Joseph Salowey wrote:
>
>> Is the current published version up to date with the rest of the comments?
>
> Yes, to my knowledge, the current draft handles all the other comments. If we
> decide to leave EAP-TLS PSK discussions for another d
> On 7 Oct 2019, at 15:10, Alan DeKok wrote:
>
> On Oct 7, 2019, at 2:32 AM, John Mattsson
> wrote:
>>
>> Joseph Salowey wrote:
>>
>>> Is the current published version up to date with the rest of the comments?
>>
>> Yes, to my knowledge, the current draft handles all the other comments. I
On Oct 7, 2019, at 10:55 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> If we evolve draft-lear-eap-teap-brski into a more generic TEAP update we
> could cover TLS 1.3 there.
Given Jouni's experience with implementing TEAP, that may be best.
i.e. TEAP cannot be implemented as-is. The spec needs to be updated
We need to come to resolution on how to resolve these errata. I hope there
has been enough time for implementors to catch up with
Jouni's implementation.
The Crypto-Binding TLV is fixed at 20 octets and the draft does not say how
to handle longer MACs.
The discussion seems to indicate that we sh
