On Oct 7, 2019, at 2:32 AM, John Mattsson 
<john.mattsson=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> wrote:
> 
>> Is the current published version up to date with the rest of the comments?
> 
> Yes, to my knowledge, the current draft handles all the other comments. If we 
> decide to leave EAP-TLS PSK discussions for another draft, I think 
> draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-07 is ready to move forward in the publication 
> process.

  I agree.

  My one worry is that if we update EAP-TLS without also updating PEAP and 
TTLS, then bad things will happen.

  My $0.02 is to remove the discussion of FAST and TEAP from 
draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types, as the remaining items are not controversial.  
The document should then be published simultaneously with the EAP-TLS updates.

  Alan DeKok.

_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to