> On 7 Oct 2019, at 15:10, Alan DeKok <al...@deployingradius.com> wrote: > > On Oct 7, 2019, at 2:32 AM, John Mattsson > <john.mattsson=40ericsson....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >> >> Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> wrote: >> >>> Is the current published version up to date with the rest of the comments? >> >> Yes, to my knowledge, the current draft handles all the other comments. If >> we decide to leave EAP-TLS PSK discussions for another draft, I think >> draft-ietf-emu-eap-tls13-07 is ready to move forward in the publication >> process. > > I agree. > > My one worry is that if we update EAP-TLS without also updating PEAP and > TTLS, then bad things will happen. > > My $0.02 is to remove the discussion of FAST and TEAP from > draft-dekok-emu-tls-eap-types, as the remaining items are not controversial. > The document should then be published simultaneously with the EAP-TLS updates.
If we evolve draft-lear-eap-teap-brski into a more generic TEAP update we could cover TLS 1.3 there. Eliot
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
