You are wrong. But let me just give my best John Major impression
from "Prime Minister's Question Time":
I refer the right-honourable gentleman to the answer I gave
some moments ago.
On Wed, December 2, 2009 10:50 pm, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Dan Harkins wrote:
>> Slicing up my posts an
Dan Harkins wrote:
> You are wrong.
Are you opposed to sending clear-text passwords in the tunnel?
Alan DeKok.
___
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
I refer the right-honourable gentleman to the answer I gave
some moments ago.
On Thu, December 3, 2009 2:53 am, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Dan Harkins wrote:
>> You are wrong.
>
> Are you opposed to sending clear-text passwords in the tunnel?
>
> Alan DeKok.
>
_
Dan Harkins wrote:
>
>
>I refer the right-honourable gentleman to the answer I gave
>some moments ago.
>
>
Since there has been no new information, I can only conclude that my
previous summary was correct, and that you have no additional concerns
with the document.
Alan DeKok.
___
Once again Alan, you are wrong. Your previous summary went off on
tangents, made statements that were irrelevant and inferred things
that I never said. Responding to it would not be productive. I have
made my comments on the draft and stand by them.
I refer you to my previous statements made
Dan Harkins wrote:
> I refer you to my previous statements made on this list for my
> concerns with the document which are current and unaddressed.
I asked for clarification, and you claim that my attempts to discuss
those clarifications are "tangents" and "straw men".
This doesn't make me
On Thu, December 3, 2009 12:24 pm, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Dan Harkins wrote:
>> I refer you to my previous statements made on this list for my
>> concerns with the document which are current and unaddressed.
>
> I asked for clarification, and you claim that my attempts to discuss
> those clarifi
The document states a clear requirement: the tunneled method MUST be
capable of sending clear-text passwords in the tunnel.
You agree that the attacks against this requirement are adequately
covered by existing text in the document:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/emu/current/msg01327.ht
Alan,
You are misrepresenting my concerns with this draft and (intentionally)
misunderstanding my post.
On Thu, December 3, 2009 1:20 pm, Alan DeKok wrote:
> The document states a clear requirement: the tunneled method MUST be
> capable of sending clear-text passwords in the tunnel.
A "
Dan Harkins wrote:
> A "clear-text" password will have to be sent "in the tunnel" because
> otherwise authentication would not be possible!
There are many authentication protocols which do not require the
sending of a clear-text password. CHAP, MS-CHAP, EKE, SRP, or your own
proposal. So I'm
10 matches
Mail list logo
