Once again Alan, you are wrong. Your previous summary went off on tangents, made statements that were irrelevant and inferred things that I never said. Responding to it would not be productive. I have made my comments on the draft and stand by them.
I refer you to my previous statements made on this list for my concerns with the document which are current and unaddressed. Dan. On Thu, December 3, 2009 11:41 am, Alan DeKok wrote: > Dan Harkins wrote: >> <approach podium> >> >> I refer the right-honourable gentleman to the answer I gave >> some moments ago. >> >> </approach podium> > > Since there has been no new information, I can only conclude that my > previous summary was correct, and that you have no additional concerns > with the document. > > Alan DeKok. > _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
