Dan Harkins wrote: > I refer you to my previous statements made on this list for my > concerns with the document which are current and unaddressed.
I asked for clarification, and you claim that my attempts to discuss those clarifications are "tangents" and "straw men". This doesn't make me believe that there are issues with the document. I suggest posting a detailed review of the document, explaining why the current text is inadequate, and which text you suggest as replacement. Simply replacing one paragraph out of context is insufficient. Your stated concerns with that paragraph are directly addressed by existing text elsewhere in the document. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
