Alan DeKok [mailto:al...@deployingradius.com] writes:
> Glen Zorn wrote:
> > Note that while it does say that the enabling of support for channel
> > bindings will not generate a new method it says nothing of the sort
> about
> > the tunneled method itself,
>
> Yes.
>
> >> Both EAP-TTLS and
Glen Zorn wrote:
>> We discuss what has been proposed. If there is another TLS-based EAP
>> method that should be included in the above list, feel free to propose
>> it.
>
> This thread is not about what is being discussed or proposed, it's about
> what the charter says.
The charter does not
Alan DeKok [mailto:al...@deployingradius.com] writes:
> Glen Zorn wrote:
> >> We discuss what has been proposed. If there is another TLS-based
> EAP
> >> method that should be included in the above list, feel free to
> propose
> >> it.
> >
> > This thread is not about what is being discussed or
Glen Zorn wrote:
> The point is that you stated that the charter "requires us to extend an
> existing TLS-based tunneled method" when in fact it does nothing of the
> sort. Either this was just an error that for some reason you refuse to
> admit or you and Joe are interpreting the charter to mean
