x27;t
yet unstow them.
I used dblocks to mirror notes. They are automatically inserted by
org-stow, and their dynamic contents is essentially copied from the
notes.
Any interest in trying this out? I can push it if anyone else wants to
try it o
ps://github.com/punchagan/org2blog.git
Both respect the normal export options (#+TITLE: etc) but other than that
the approaches are fairly different.
Please tell me if I've missed any other org-based blogging software (other
than the blog hosting software which is a different categor
> On 2011-01-16, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>> Please tell me if I've missed any other org-based blogging software
>> (other
>> than the blog hosting software which is a different category).
>
> Right, there are hosted blogs (like Blogger) and self-hosted blo
?
* An #+XXX: line?
What information does other org-based blogging software use as labels?
Thanks,
Tom Breton (Tehom)
*** Footnotes
[fn:1] My change consists of
* a patch at http://www.panix.com/~tehom/my-code/gblogger.el.diff
* It sent it to T V Raman, so maybe it will be in th
s that could be done - it's only used by some of
the cond branches, the others are unchanged. But "publish early and
often", so here it is.
I will append the changes as a diff, since I can't push to the org
repository ("fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly")
-kill-product-buffer-when-displayed', so the bug
may not have been obvious.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
a slightly different way, but that doesn't seem
as good as a "real" image link, and it seems to duplicate functionality
that the cond statement has (and now in my new stuff, that
`org-html-make-link' always handles)
Tom Breton (Tehom)
___
. It seems redundant to other code. But I'd like
to hear from others before I dare snip it out.
That is, the code that begins ";; Make an image out of the
description if that is so wanted"
Tom Breton (Tehom)
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
ame relativizing step?
* How do you feel about url-parse? It's bundled with emacs, builds
and destructures urls. IMO we're not at the stage where it
provides more help than the extra work it requires yet.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
__
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Apr 28, 2010, at 5:01 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>
>>
>> The changes are essentially made and pass my tests now, there's mostly
housekeeping now: pull, merge, push.
>>
>>> Yes. Send me your name on repo.or.cz and I'll add push f
I thought it
was visible to everybody. Isn't it?
I thought I had done what you wanted by creating a branch for all my
changes ever (tehom-master) and rebasing the org-html link changes on that
(html-export-refactor-build-link). Is that working for you? If not, how
ke a one-time branch that just removes the testing
directory. But then what happens for any future fixes? Seems like
each time I'd have to rebase that branch and pick thru changes and
make it discard each change that deals with testing/. It seems h
idered it carefully;
I wrote a small document considering the alternatives and chose this
as best. But it's young enough that it could be changed, were strong
arguments made towards some alternative.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
___
Emacs-orgmode mai
lly and if that proves
hard to maintain then we still have the other option.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
> "Tom Breton (Tehom)" writes:
>
>> At Carsten's request, I am proposing emtest as the tester for
>> org-mode. I would like to hear if there are any objections or
>> questions.
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> My googling didn't manage to find emtest -- whe
matches (:file OUTPUT-FILE-NAME))
For testing only visible output, you'd presumably use org-export-visible
and compare that buffer's contents to what's expected.
Wildcard comparisons in files are not yet supported. I will take that as
a feature request.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
> "Tom Breton (Tehom)" writes:
>
>> Any interest in trying this out? I can push it if anyone else wants to
>> try it out.
>
> I'm interested! Please let me know where I can read some code.
>
> Thanks :)
I pushed it just now; it's on branch stow
cceeds.
If you'd like the type-checking support (which is stand-alone) or all of
emtest, I can certainly include it. Since you seem to have chosen ert, I
don't know what you want in this regard.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
___
Emacs-orgmode mail
in
\home\tehom\projects\elisp\org-mode\doc\local\org-stow.org/org-stow/Docs/
* M-x org-stow-item, update dblocks
* Now the doc section of this file contains this item
* Finish writing it (a moment from now) and update.
So I've added to a document while just dealing with notes,
nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
> Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>> (let*
>>((x 1))
>>(eval-after-load 'simple (setq x 2))
>>x)
>>
>> =3D> 2
>>
>>
>>
>> (let*
>>((x 1))
>>(eval-after-load 'simp
>>> On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>>>
>>
>> (let*
>> ((x 1))
>> (eval-after-load 'simple (setq x 2))
>> x)
>>
>> => 2
>>
>>
>>
>> (let*
>> ((x 1))
>&
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>> [...]
>> I couldn't reproduce this. Is this on the same test file as before?
>
> Sorry for the delay in reply, Tom. I reproduce the situation below:
>
> First the test file.
>
> --8<--
> Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>
>>
>> >>> On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> (let*
>> >> ((x 1))
>> >> (eval-after-load 'simple (setq x 2))
>> >>
`org-map-entries' is called. This is
admittedly a quick and dirty fix, if it even works.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
org-choose.el.diff
Description: Binary data
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the li
ith XEmacs, the symbol version not.
Thank you. And thank you for your patience with this.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
The previous message would have worked better if I had actually remembered
to attach the patch. Here it is.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
org-choose.el.diff
Description: Binary data
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send repli
ion for originally putting it in
`eval-when-compile'.
> I think that is a pity because it is *so* useful, but
> there you go.
My sentiments exactly.
> So, maybe at some point you might want to replace the cl functions
> with other code.
Yes. I
Here is a bugfix for org-choose that I've been meaning to post.
The bug was this:
When looking for alternatives, it looks at the whole tree, not just
the immediate children.
Now fixed. Patch is attached.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
org-choose.el.diff
Description: Binary
I don't know how this slipped by me before, and I was sure that I had run
the test suite and validated the previous fix, but I just noticed a
serious bug, and patched it.
The bug is that org-choose uses the wrong number for "LEVEL", resulting in
no keep-sensible checking. I attach a patch for it.
tween org versions.
Third, I have fixed the real bug - properly now, I hope! - and
attached a patch.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
org-choose.el.diff
Description: Binary data
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the lis
one by one) or you have to
do extra work to group them. If they're in file, you can run every
test in a package with `rtest:library'. The other really convenient
way to run a test is rtest:defun-at-point.
> If we can, would we loose quality/speed of tests?
Not at all.
Tom Breton (
called after includes are handled. Diffs
appended.
Another advantage: `org-update-all-dblocks' didn't seem to work in
org-export-preprocess-hook because the working buffer isn't yet in
org-mode when it's called, but works in the new hook.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
*** old-org-exp
> Hi Tom,
>
> is there a reason why you did not put the hook right after
> the include file moment?
>
> - Carsten
Yes, two. But of course your judgement should take precedence.
In order to make my change slightly less severe, I put it just before
operations of a similar nature, and it seemed to
Dan writes:
> There are more details below. The code is at
>
> http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~davison/software/org-table-R/org-table-R.el
>
> It would be great to get any feedback on this. My thought was that
> something like this has the potential to provide a unified plotting
> and table formula int
I used encap-sexp to do it automatically (it's on my site,
http://panix.com/~tehom/my-code/), so no code changed, and I kept that
comment aligned with the regexp.
Made `org-set-regexps-and-options' also process
`org-todo-blockage-keywords'.
Changed the behavior of org-todo and org-depend
>
> On Jan 4, 2009, at 3:33 PM, Steven E. Harris wrote:
> [...]
>> Without knowing what the enclosing `quote' form means, how do know
>> that
>> "((def))" is not part of it?
>
> Hi Steven,
>
> good question, and the answer is that is does not know,
> cannot know, because this is a feature that is
gt;
> The two external links have the mentioned ids and the links work in org,
> however html export gives me the following html snippet:
>
>
Looks like the problem is that it is html-escaped because it's the headline.
I actually think this is the right behavior.
Tom Breton (Teho
oceed-p. So most of it got indented
further but no change other than whitespace. I can diff it without -b if
you prefer.
> You could use a bright font to mark this tag, in order to
> make it obvious. And you could use a custom query to look
> for blocked items, to see what can be done
On my last two requests, Carsten had better ideas and my proposal
really benefitted from them. So I'm asking for advice on the design.
** Rationale
When I make a decision, in org-mode, I write down the set of
reasonable alternatives that I see, each one as an item. Then I make
notes about e
e while you mess around with
> with the status of the siblings. Maybe do the same thing with
> the variables that trigger time stamp and note recording.
Right. I had already planned to let the hooks to nil; I will do the
same for the time stamp and note recording variables.
Thank
y.
Certainly. One thing, once my testing package rtest is in a stable state,
I plan to release it on its own, possibly as a sourceforge project. But I
have no objection to you also putting in the org contrib directory.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
___
Emacs
> That would turn your patch into a generally useful system
> of hooks where other ideas could be implemented as well.
>
> What do you think?
Sounds good to me.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
the widget so that it appends its value to the list,
> rather than adding to the front. Hope you agree,
> I made this change right in contrib/lisp/org-choose.el
Good. It occurred to me shortly after I sent the file that it would be
better to append.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
___
but you can upload
> any format you like (or send it it me) and we wil publish it there.
OK, I've add comments, keywords, and some docstrings I forgot to
org-choose.el, and I wrote a standalone doc. Both are attached.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
docs.org-choose.el.diff
Description: Binary data
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
> [...]
>> OK, I've add comments, keywords, and some docstrings I forgot to
>> org-choose.el, and I wrote a standalone doc. Both are attached.
>
> This is very intriguing functionality. I tried to follow
te. How do we interpret that?
I couldn't reproduce this. Is this on the same test file as before?
Tom Breton (Tehom)
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://li
Manish saw. I can't reproduce this. I suspect that it
relates to outline somehow not being loaded, but org-choose
requires org which requires outline. I find a dependency on
org-agenda from `org-map-entries' in org.el, and once I l
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 10, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Manish wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>> OK, I've add comments, keyword
build directory. I made some minor changes to make it do that and
to gunzip the archive. I've attached it to this message.
Tom Breton (Tehom)
update-org.sh
Description: Bourne shell script
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All&
7;s reader macro #' which does sort of
the same thing.
At the syntax level, it's really a combination of # which signals a
reader macro - though in emacs, it's all hard-coded and inextensible - and
' which stands for the function-
>
> On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>
>> This bug is simple. In "Setting it all up" at the end of org-
>> choose.el,
>> in 6.22b a quote got introduced before progn. That's all. With that
>> quote, it "evaluated
51 matches
Mail list logo
