Ihor Radchenko writes:
Org mode does not bind M-k and M-j.
It is something in your config.
In addition, if I am correct one can check where those keybindings are
overriden with `C-h k` (or `M-x describe-key`), example:
M-x describe-key RET M-j
On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 1:40 PM Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Matt writes:
>
> > >...or did you not provided arguments /why/ the
> > > section should be moved? I need to understand what kind of improvement
> > > it would provide to the manual.
> >
> > I didn't know that's what you were looking for.
Thanks for your comments!
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> [...]
> Several comments:
>
> 1. Nitpick: siblings's (it is current Emacs grammar convention in the
> manuals)
Fixed.
> 2. Please add some examples with illustration. Now, this description
>feels too dense
Having written International te
Dear org-mode developers, this is
a twofold feature request:
I write a piece documentation with a
glossary in form of a description list
and want to able to link to the
descriptions. The thing is then
exported to HTML.
The only way to do that I found was with
direct links, but this
1. does not
> | Calling convention | org-latex-preview |
> org-toggle-inline-images-command |
> |+---+---|
> | C-c C-x C-[l,v]| toggle preview at point | toggle preview at
> point |
> |
Bundled org mode, emacs started without any customizations. When
changing todo state of several entries at once, either from agenda or by
selection a region with entries in an org file, only last entry gets state
change logged. Seems like a bug, the expectation is consistent behaviour
across all se
Peter Solodov writes:
> Bundled org mode, emacs started without any customizations. When
> changing todo state of several entries at once, either from agenda or by
> selection a region with entries in an org file, only last entry gets state
> change logged. Seems like a bug, the expectation is co
arthur miller writes:
>> ...
>>Are there any specific todo items there that you view as more suitable
>>for people with limited experience in Emacs codebase?
>
> I am not sure if this is something, I hope you don't mind me asking, but
> could a
> work to modularize Org, be an appropriate subject
Karthik Chikmagalur writes:
> Ihor: Based on this, what do you think of the following behavior for
> org-toggle-inline-images-command?
>
> C-c C-x C-v : toggle link preview at point
>or unconditionally preview active region (not toggle)
>or unconditionally preview
Sławomir Grochowski writes:
> I have found a bug in regexp.
> Test that need to pass to fix it is below.
Thanks!
May you also fix the regexp in `org-columns-compile-format'?
I recommend using `rx' to make the regexp more readable and less prone
to mistakes.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org m
the_wurfkreuz writes:
> Reproduction is in the attachment file.
>
> Also, i've already written a similar report like a month and a half ago and
> after the fix the bug disappeared. And now it's apparently here again.
> Emacs : GNU Emacs 30.0.60 (build 4, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version
> 3.24
Milan Zamazal writes:
>> "IR" == Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
> IR> Note that we also have diary style timestamps with arbitrary
> IR> logic of date selection.
>
> The primary problem with those timestamps is that they cannot be marked
> as DONE and disappear from agendas for the given d
Gregor Zattler writes:
> The second effect does not show up, if
> [[link][link]] is used instead of
> [[link]] but this is tedious to type
> and IMHO unneccesary.
See https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/m2il81n2e6@me.com/
We can discuss this part of your proposal there.
--
Ihor Radchenko //
>> This is much closer to the behavior of org-latex-preview. Since all
>> these behaviors are new I think it makes sense to be as consistent as
>> possible for "preview" behavior in Org.
>
> I agree.
> Do you want to create a patch to that effect?
I'll send a patch.
>> Separately, are you intere
Hi Ihor, Rudolf,
* Ihor Radchenko [2023-10-14; 09:01 GMT]:
> Rudolf Adamkovič writes:
>
>>> What about [[Link][link]]?
>>
>> That makes Org documents hard to read in *plain text*, that is without
>> the "descriptive links" fontification. Here is my note again, compare:
>>
>> EXAMPLE 1: Hard-to-r
>>> ...
>>>Are there any specific todo items there that you view as more suitable
>>>for people with limited experience in Emacs codebase?
>>
>> I am not sure if this is something, I hope you don't mind me asking, but
>> could a
>> work to modularize Org, be an appropriate subject?
>
>Yes, it can b
16 matches
Mail list logo