Try "0 r" or "1 r" or "2 r" or "3 r".
- Carsten
On Mar 22, 2007, at 8:55, Leo wrote:
I have seen the following in buffer brought up by "C-c a t".
,
| Available with `N r': (0)ALL (1)ACTION (2)WAITING (3)DONE
`
but when I key 'N r', nothing happens.
Best,
--
Leo
On 2007-03-07, Carsten Dominik said:
> Fixed, thanks.
>
> - Carsten
I just noticed one minor issue for check boxes. As in org 4.69:
- [ ] Check box 1<--- C-j
|<--- cursor moved here
I think the following is more elegant:
- [ ] Check box 1<--- C-j
|<--- cursor moved here
Wha
On 2007-03-22, Carsten Dominik said:
> Try "0 r" or "1 r" or "2 r" or "3 r".
>
> - Carsten
>
Ah, every nice ;)
> On Mar 22, 2007, at 8:55, Leo wrote:
>
>> I have seen the following in buffer brought up by "C-c a t".
>>
>> ,
>> | Available with `N r': (0)ALL (1)ACTION (2)WAITING (3)DONE
>> `-
On 2007-03-13, Carsten Dominik said:
> - Improvements to the date/time prompt.
>
> + When you move (using S-cursor keys) the cursor in the pop-up
> calendar window while responding to a date/time prompt, the
> prompt is updated with the new default date. Works only under
>
On Mar 22, 2007, at 0:28, Jason F. McBrayer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 23:21 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Mar 21, 2007, at 15:27, Jason F. McBrayer wrote:
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
All I really need it for is multiple DONE states (e.g. COMPLETED
vs. CANCELLED). T
On Mar 21, 2007, at 15:41, Jason F. McBrayer wrote:
The progress on multiple TODO sequences has reminded me of a small
thing that bugs me with TODO keyword search agendas. It's not
possible to have a TODO keyword search agenda that matches multiple
keywords (such as SOMEDAY|MAYBE). You can in
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thank you very much, but this is a bit tricky, so maybe I should do
> this.
I'd guess it would be better for you to do it. I had a look at what
would be involved, and a working change would touch a lot more places
in the file than I thought it would,
On Mar 22, 2007, at 16:21, Jason F. McBrayer wrote:
If you send me a complex patch, we need to get your papers with the
FSF first, or I cannot install the fixes into Emacs. I already have
the papers from David and Piotr, so if you plan to contribute code
in the future, maybe we should go ahead
On Mar 19, 2007, at 13:46, Alan Dove wrote:
Hey, folks:
I've also been using org-mode with longlines-mode, and had noticed
that the two occasionally conflict. I've just developed workarounds
for the bugs that affect me, mostly inserting extra carriage returns
here and there to ensure the ri
I CC the list.
On 2007-03-22, Eddward DeVilla said:
> On 3/22/07, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 2007-03-07, Carsten Dominik said:
>>
>> > Fixed, thanks.
>
>> >
>> > - Carsten
>>
>> I just noticed one minor issue for check boxes. As in org 4.69:
>>
>>- [ ] Check box 1<--- C-j
>> |
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mar 22, 2007, at 16:21, Jason F. McBrayer wrote:
>> I'm not sure what would be better. But this reminds me that we
>> need a tty compatibility binding for org-shiftcontrolright and
>> org-shiftcontrolleft.
>
> Agh. Yes. Proposals?
Well, t
11 matches
Mail list logo
