Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Ihor Radchenko writes:
>
>> Instead, it might make more sense to pass the information about file
>> changes (if available) to the hook itself directly.
>> For example, we may obsolete `org-attach-after-change-hook' and introduce
>> `org-attach-after-change-functions'. T
Ihor Radchenko writes:
> Instead, it might make more sense to pass the information about file
> changes (if available) to the hook itself directly.
> For example, we may obsolete `org-attach-after-change-hook' and introduce
> `org-attach-after-change-functions'. Then, we pass attachment dir +
>
"Christopher M. Miles" writes:
> Subject: [PATCH] org-attach.el: put org-attach-after-change-hook at the end
>
> lisp/org-attach.el (org-attach-attach): Put org-attach-after-change-hook
> at the end to make sure user can access attach link in org-store-links.
I have no problem with the change, b
lisp/org-attach.el (org-attach-attach): Put org-attach-after-change-hook
at the end to make sure user can access attach link in org-store-links.
From f21ef819ab6670f1ed64a731d5d7b5fb29119f33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: stardiviner
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 11:31:53 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] org-att
