Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > >> Instead, it might make more sense to pass the information about file >> changes (if available) to the hook itself directly. >> For example, we may obsolete `org-attach-after-change-hook' and introduce >> `org-attach-after-change-functions'. Then, we pass attachment dir + >> list of changed files to that new abnormal hook. >> WDYT? > > It has been a while since the last message in this thread. > Christopher, did you have a chance to look into this? Or did you find an > alternative approach to the problem?
Since I see no clear benefit in applying this patch (it does not seem to solve the problem it is claiming to solve), I am canceling the patch. Canceled. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
