Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > Instead, it might make more sense to pass the information about file > changes (if available) to the hook itself directly. > For example, we may obsolete `org-attach-after-change-hook' and introduce > `org-attach-after-change-functions'. Then, we pass attachment dir + > list of changed files to that new abnormal hook. > WDYT?
It has been a while since the last message in this thread. Christopher, did you have a chance to look into this? Or did you find an alternative approach to the problem? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
