d...@teklibre.org (Dave Täht) writes:
> You are right, but I have found the default install of emacs to be so
> lame on so many distros for so long that I can understand why people
> have flocked to other editors.
>
> Take, for example, the fact that no distro that I know of installs an
> emacs c
tycho garen writes:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:59:53PM -0600, Dave Täht wrote:
>> "Jing Su @ Gmail" writes:
>> >
>> > I fully understand that Emacs 21 is way out of date. However, since
>> > RHEL is one of the mainstream commercial distros, and is common on
>> > servers, it would be great if
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:59:53PM -0600, Dave Täht wrote:
> "Jing Su @ Gmail" writes:
> >
> > I fully understand that Emacs 21 is way out of date. However, since
> > RHEL is one of the mainstream commercial distros, and is common on
> > servers, it would be great if org-mode can be consistent wit
"Jing Su @ Gmail" writes:
> Hi guys,
>
> I was wondering how to install org-mode for Emacs 21.4.1, which is the
> latest version provided by RHEL 5 and RHEL 4. I even cannot find
> previous releases for Emacs 21 at all, nor on the FAQ. It looks that
> Emacs 21 is no longer supported.
>
> I fully
Hi guys,
I was wondering how to install org-mode for Emacs 21.4.1, which is the
latest version provided by RHEL 5 and RHEL 4. I even cannot find
previous releases for Emacs 21 at all, nor on the FAQ. It looks that
Emacs 21 is no longer supported.
I fully understand that Emacs 21 is way out o
