Re: [O] git useage question

2011-06-05 Thread Achim Gratz
Jude DaShiell writes: > I wouldn't be writing this if the documentation were reasonable. Once > org-mode gets cloned, how is git properly used to update the cloned > instance on a machine? If you set up the clone correctly (assuming you use a local branch for keeping your customizations to th

Re: [O] git useage question

2011-06-05 Thread Jude DaShiell
uemacs is not microemacs those are two entirely different products and Daniel Lawrence was responsible for microemacs. Not only that for screen reader users in dos, uemacs wrote to the screen incorrectly and too fast for screen readers to speak. On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Rustom Mody wrote: > Jude

Re: [O] git useage question

2011-06-05 Thread Rustom Mody
Jude DaShiell wrote: > The only place microemacs might be by now could be some orphan version of the simtel archives. Taken down but last I > knew not entirely removed from the internet. Does not seem to match the data here http://git.kernel.org/?p=editors/uemacs/uemacs.git;a=summary Note the dat

Re: [O] git useage question

2011-06-04 Thread Jude DaShiell
The only place microemacs might be by now could be some orphan version of the simtel archives. Taken down but last I knew not entirely removed from the internet. On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Nick Dokos wrote: > Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > Compare that documentation with the documentation written for >

Re: [O] git useage question

2011-06-04 Thread Nick Dokos
Jude DaShiell wrote: > Compare that documentation with the documentation written for > micro-emacs, that should give you an idea what I mean by reasonable > documentation. Also, thanks for the faq pointers. > and > 1) so we understand each other. My complaint has nothing to do with >o

Re: [O] git useage question

2011-06-04 Thread Pieter Praet
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 19:26:54 -0400 (EDT), Jude DaShiell wrote: > 1) so we understand each other. My complaint has nothing to do with >org-mode's documentation and everything to do with the documentation >for git itself. [...] Oh, I see :D So your query should have been directed to the

Re: [O] git useage question

2011-06-04 Thread Jude DaShiell
1) so we understand each other. My complaint has nothing to do with org-mode's documentation and everything to do with the documentation for git itself.On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Pieter Praet wrote: > On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 18:05:47 -0400 (EDT), Jude DaShiell > wrote: > > I wouldn't be writing thi

Re: [O] git useage question

2011-06-04 Thread Pieter Praet
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 18:05:47 -0400 (EDT), Jude DaShiell wrote: > I wouldn't be writing this if the documentation were reasonable. Once > org-mode gets cloned, how is git properly used to update the cloned > instance on a machine? I wouldn't be writing this if your comment were reasonable. Th

Re: [O] git useage question

2011-06-04 Thread Jude DaShiell
Compare that documentation with the documentation written for micro-emacs, that should give you an idea what I mean by reasonable documentation. Also, thanks for the faq pointers. On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Nick Dokos wrote: > Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > I wouldn't be writing this if the documentati

Re: [O] git useage question

2011-06-04 Thread Nick Dokos
Jude DaShiell wrote: > I wouldn't be writing this if the documentation were reasonable. Once > org-mode gets cloned, how is git properly used to update the cloned > instance on a machine? > What's unreasonable about the doc? If you don't have any local changes, see http://orgmode.org/w

[O] git useage question

2011-06-04 Thread Jude DaShiell
I wouldn't be writing this if the documentation were reasonable. Once org-mode gets cloned, how is git properly used to update the cloned instance on a machine?