1) so we understand each other. My complaint has nothing to do with org-mode's documentation and everything to do with the documentation for git itself.On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Pieter Praet wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 18:05:47 -0400 (EDT), Jude DaShiell > <jdash...@shellworld.net> wrote: > > I wouldn't be writing this if the documentation were reasonable. Once > > org-mode gets cloned, how is git properly used to update the cloned > > instance on a machine? > > I wouldn't be writing this if your comment were reasonable. > > > The following should be more than sufficient: > - http://orgmode.org/manual/Installation.html#Installation > - http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#Keeping-current > > > In the *highly unlikely* case that it isn't: > You're probably already aware of this (though this awareness may be > temporarily impeded due to Saturday night related inebriation), but > it's worth noting that Org-mode's documentation documents Org-mode. > > Org-mode != git, otherwise it would be called git instead of Org-mode, see? > > Kindly refer to some relevant (and extremely abundant) documentation: > - http://git-scm.com/documentation > > > Peace > >
