Done
On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 at 22:55 Yehonathan Sharvit wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Matt Price wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Bastien wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> Matt Price writes:
>
> > Would we need a switch to permit the old syntax for people with
> > complex setups
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Matt Price wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Bastien wrote:
>
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> Matt Price writes:
>>
>> > Would we need a switch to permit the old syntax for people with
>> > complex setups who don't want to change?
>>
>> Yes. We need to be more ca
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Matt Price writes:
>
> > Would we need a switch to permit the old syntax for people with
> > complex setups who don't want to change?
>
> Yes. We need to be more careful on being backward compatible.
>
> The new patch in that other
Hi Matt,
Matt Price writes:
> Would we need a switch to permit the old syntax for people with
> complex setups who don't want to change?
Yes. We need to be more careful on being backward compatible.
> - make src-clojure in customizable
> ?
>
> Is this likely to break anything in deri
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:36 AM, Bastien Guerry wrote:
> That said, I think we can take this opportunity to slightly improve
> how ox-html handles source code:
>
> - why only and not ?
>
Would we need a switch to permit the old syntax for people with complex
setups who don't want to change?
>
Hi Matt,
Matt Price writes:
> Two more little things. HTML blocks can't use the standard editor so
> they need an extra attribute `data-editor-style="html"`
I'm not sure what you mean here: can you give an example?
> Also, it would be nice if klipse had an elisp REPL since so many org
> users
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 at 19:55 Matt Price wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Rasmus wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> >> It might be worth investigating whether you can just run Klipse on
> >> blocks as that would potentially make it backward compatible.
> >> Potentially, an extension to Klipse that
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:06 AM, Rasmus wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> >> It might be worth investigating whether you can just run Klipse on
> >> blocks as that would potentially make it backward compatible.
> >> Potentially, an extension to Klipse that recognizes Org src blocks (in
> >> html) might be ni
Hi all,
thanks for adding me to this discussion!
klipse + org works pretty much out of the box, which is really great.
I just tested it again with a mix of Scheme and Clojure blocks, both
can work together within the same HTML page.
That said, I think we can take this opportunity to slightly imp
Hi all,
>> It might be worth investigating whether you can just run Klipse on
>> blocks as that would potentially make it backward compatible.
>> Potentially, an extension to Klipse that recognizes Org src blocks (in
>> html) might be nice.
>>
> I think that should be pretty straighforward.
Yeah
Hi Matt,
> In other threads I've been describing a method to allow live code snippets
> to be embedded in reveal.js export, using klipse (
> https://github.com/viebel/klipse). I have to say it feels somewhat
> transformative to me, and I wonder if it would be worth integrating into
> ox-html. I'
On Tuesday, 13 Dec 2016 at 14:55, Matt Price wrote:
> In other threads I've been describing a method to allow live code
> snippets to be embedded in reveal.js export, using klipse (https://
> github.com/viebel/klipse). I have to say it feels somewhat
> transformative to me, and I wonder if it woul
In other threads I've been describing a method to allow live code snippets
to be embedded in reveal.js export, using klipse (
https://github.com/viebel/klipse). I have to say it feels somewhat
transformative to me, and I wonder if it would be worth integrating into
ox-html. I'd be happy to hack t
13 matches
Mail list logo
