On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Matt Price <mopto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Hi Matt, >> >> Matt Price <mopto...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > Would we need a switch to permit the old syntax for people with >> > complex setups who don't want to change? >> >> Yes. We need to be more careful on being backward compatible. >> >> The new patch in that other thread does this. > > >> > - make src-clojure in <pre class="src src-clojure"> customizable >> > ? >> > >> > Is this likely to break anything in derived exporters? It would >> > certianly be convenient e.g for using highlight.js in wordpress in >> > similar environments. >> >> Yes. >> > > >> > This seems like a good idea and pretty easy. >> >> I will think more about this. >> >> > I odn't really quite understand the problem and solution parameters. >> > Since Yehonathan is here on this thread and enthusiastic about >> > helping out: is there something he could do to make this feasible for >> > us? Or by "more general mechanism" do you mean some third way >> > between bundling and linking to? >> >> One way to solve this on Yehonathan's side is to update klipse.js and >> follow the instruction on librejs on how to make librejs accept the js >> code as "safe": >> >> https://www.gnu.org/software/librejs/free-your-javascript.html >> >> I don't know how much work is involved in this, though. >> > > I think you just have to add two lines to non-minified scripts, and one > more to minified scripts: > https://www.gnu.org/software/librejs/free-your-javascript. > html#magnet-link-license > > Yehonathan, would you bewilling to do this? > Sure. Will do it tomorrow. > > > >> -- >> Bastien >> > >
