On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:07 AM, Bastien <b...@gnu.org> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Matt Price <mopto...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Would we need a switch to permit the old syntax for people with > > complex setups who don't want to change? > > Yes. We need to be more careful on being backward compatible. > > The new patch in that other thread does this.
> > - make src-clojure in <pre class="src src-clojure"> customizable > > ? > > > > Is this likely to break anything in derived exporters? It would > > certianly be convenient e.g for using highlight.js in wordpress in > > similar environments. > > Yes. > > > This seems like a good idea and pretty easy. > > I will think more about this. > > > I odn't really quite understand the problem and solution parameters. > > Since Yehonathan is here on this thread and enthusiastic about > > helping out: is there something he could do to make this feasible for > > us? Or by "more general mechanism" do you mean some third way > > between bundling and linking to? > > One way to solve this on Yehonathan's side is to update klipse.js and > follow the instruction on librejs on how to make librejs accept the js > code as "safe": > > https://www.gnu.org/software/librejs/free-your-javascript.html > > I don't know how much work is involved in this, though. > I think you just have to add two lines to non-minified scripts, and one more to minified scripts: https://www.gnu.org/software/librejs/free-your-javascript.html#magnet-link-license Yehonathan, would you bewilling to do this? > -- > Bastien >
