* Samuel Wales wrote:
> perhaps this is possible:
>
> c-c ' -> c-c c-x '
If you are using US_intl with digraph (deadkeys) in order to type
special characters, ' needs actually two keys: ' + SPACE
So I guess this is not that great for common commands typed often a
day.
--
mail|git|SVN|photos|
perhaps this is possible:
c-c ' -> c-c c-x '
Bastien wrote:
> What do you think of `C-c :', as suggested in my reply to Thomas?
I'd favor a common `C-c C-' prefix for all moved key bindings.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
Achim Gratz writes:
> I'd think you need to curl the pinky at least unless you're talking
> about a laptop keyboard with a favorable position for the Ctrl key.
>
> It's really a bad thing if you've developed certain types of RSI and may
> even be impossible if you have coordinative disabilities o
Karl Voit writes:
> In fact, I never use the original left CTRL key at all. And more or
> less thanks to bad habit, I never use the right CTRL key.
Yep, I'm exactly in the same boat.
--
Bastien
* Achim Gratz wrote:
> Bastien writes:
>> Samuel Wales writes:
>>
>>> remember: using
>>> one hand for both modifier and key is never an option.
>>
>> Why? For me C-c C-' is very easy with one hand, I don't even
>> need to move the fingers.
>
> I'd think you need to curl the pinky at least unles
Bastien writes:
> Samuel Wales writes:
>
>> remember: using
>> one hand for both modifier and key is never an option.
>
> Why? For me C-c C-' is very easy with one hand, I don't even
> need to move the fingers.
I'd think you need to curl the pinky at least unless you're talking
about a laptop ke
rsi.
one of the worst things you can do is use a single hand for more than one key.
On 2/9/14, Bastien wrote:
> Samuel Wales writes:
>
>> remember: using
>> one hand for both modifier and key is never an option.
>
> Why? For me C-c C-' is very easy with one hand, I don't even
> need to move t
Samuel Wales writes:
> remember: using
> one hand for both modifier and key is never an option.
Why? For me C-c C-' is very easy with one hand, I don't even
need to move the fingers.
--
Bastien
hi karl,
it is true that there are assumptions about the user's environment.
the strongest is probably qwerty, followed by european language,
english, and common layouts. as a native english speaker, i am aware
that i am fortunate in that regard. i get to use utf-8 without making
my text files l
* Rasmus wrote:
> Karl Voit writes:
>
>> Personally, I do think that tech-savvy users of non English speaking
>> countries should definitely consider switching to US_intl layout for
>> many reasons.
>
> What if the set of letters in English is a subset of the set of
> letters in your the tech-s
Karl Voit writes:
> Personally, I do think that tech-savvy users of non English speaking
> countries should definitely consider switching to US_intl layout for
> many reasons.
What if the set of letters in English is a subset of the set of
letters in your the tech-savvy users language?
> From
* Bastien wrote:
> Hi Karl,
Hi Bastien!
> Karl Voit writes:
>
>> So: what are these assumptions for Emacs/Org-mode? I guess this is
>> the root question we should try to answer (and document).
>
> Well, this is a general Emacs issue.
Sure.
> I guess the assumption is that keybindings are op
Hi Karl,
Karl Voit writes:
> So: what are these assumptions for Emacs/Org-mode? I guess this is
> the root question we should try to answer (and document).
Well, this is a general Emacs issue. I guess the assumption is that
keybindings are optimized for US keyboards layouts - that said, some
c
* Samuel Wales wrote:
Hi!
> i meant that c-c c-' and c-c c-" are both cumbersome for those users
> who press c-c by holding down the control key with the right hand and
> then pressing c with the left hand. c-c ' is not cumbersome for those
> users.
Oh, this is a sensitive subject :-)
For exa
15 matches
Mail list logo
