* Rasmus <ras...@gmx.us> wrote:
> Karl Voit <devn...@karl-voit.at> writes:
>
>> Personally, I do think that tech-savvy users of non English speaking
>> countries should definitely consider switching to US_intl layout for
>> many reasons.
>
> What if the set of letters in English is a subset of the set of
> letters in your the tech-savvy users language?
This is the case with the German language. However, there are ways
to enter German umlauts with us_intl layout (digraph).
With Microsoft Windows as an exception, it is possible to switch
keyboard layouts on keyboard shortcuts.
However, when I am coding, I am only using English variable names
and comments. So most of the time, I am happy with 7-bit ASCII
characters.
If you do not code nor use strange environments like LaTeX, you
might as well ignore my comments about tech-savvy people which was
maybe a bit too general.
>> From my experience, only a minority of text-savvy users are doing
>> so.
>
> Perhaps the objective that these users are maximizing another
> objective than the one you have in mind?
Yes, you are absolutely right. So "tech-savvy" is probably too
unspecific as a term. However, "coders" seems to be narrow as well.
Maybe you can think of a term in between? ;-)
--
mail|git|SVN|photos|postings|SMS|phonecalls|RSS|CSV|XML to Org-mode:
> get Memacs from https://github.com/novoid/Memacs <
https://github.com/novoid/extract_pdf_annotations_to_orgmode + more on github
