Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-02-05 Thread Alan Schmitt
Rasmus writes: > Alan Schmitt writes: > >> Rasmus: do you want to change these, or should I do it and apply the >> patch? (The former would be simpler, I have to say.) > > Attached. Sorry about the delay. They should fix Nicholas' > 'concerns'. Applied and pushed, thanks. Alan

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-02-05 Thread Alan Schmitt
Alan Schmitt writes: > Hello Rasmus, > > I applied the first patch, with the following small changes. Please ignore this email, there was something wrong in my setup (I was in the maint branch ...). Sorry for the noise. Alan

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-02-05 Thread Alan Schmitt
Hello Rasmus, I applied the first patch, with the following small changes. This part would not apply: --8<---cut here---start->8--- @@ -252,7 +258,7 @@ This option can also be set with the OPTIONS keyword, e.g.: :group 'org-export-koma-letter) (defcustom

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-02-05 Thread Rasmus
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > No. Other groups are `org-export-latex', `org-export-html'... Bastien writes: > Unless I miss something, other groups are > > org-export-html > org-export-latex > > etc. > > so org-export-koma-letter seems right. Right. That's a late night blunder on my part! Thank

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-02-05 Thread Alan Schmitt
Rasmus writes: > Quick but unrelated question. I'm updating the Worg page and I > noticed that the customize-group for ox-koma-letter is > org-export-koma-letter. Given that other groups are org-latex and > org-html etc., should the group not be called org-koma-letter? Yes, org-koma-letter sou

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-02-04 Thread Bastien
Hi Rasmus, Rasmus writes: > Quick but unrelated question. I'm updating the Worg page and I > noticed that the customize-group for ox-koma-letter is > org-export-koma-letter. Given that other groups are org-latex and > org-html etc., should the group not be called org-koma-letter? Unless I mis

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-02-04 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Rasmus writes: > Given that other groups are org-latex and > org-html etc., should the group not be called org-koma-letter? No. Other groups are `org-export-latex', `org-export-html'... Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-02-04 Thread Rasmus
Quick but unrelated question. I'm updating the Worg page and I noticed that the customize-group for ox-koma-letter is org-export-koma-letter. Given that other groups are org-latex and org-html etc., should the group not be called org-koma-letter? –Rasmus PS: Sorry for not starting a new thread

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-02-04 Thread Rasmus
Alan Schmitt writes: > Rasmus: do you want to change these, or should I do it and apply the > patch? (The former would be simpler, I have to say.) Attached. Sorry about the delay. They should fix Nicholas' 'concerns'. –Rasmus -- Vote for proprietary math! >From 8f3e69f5ca3d0153b6f4c80b74c7a

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-02-04 Thread Rasmus Pank Roulund
>>> Would you give the attached patches a spin? I think they work nicely; >>> only the second patch is non-trivial. Basically, one can ignore >>> subject and title differences as now by setting >>> org-koma-letter-prefer-subject to t and not use the SUBJECT keyword. >>> >>> I have set the default

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-02-04 Thread Alan Schmitt
Hello, Sorry for not replying earlier, I've been swamped by traveling and work. Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Rasmus writes: > >> Would you give the attached patches a spin? I think they work nicely; >> only the second patch is non-trivial. Basically, one can ignore >> subject and tit

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-01-25 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Rasmus writes: > Would you give the attached patches a spin? I think they work nicely; > only the second patch is non-trivial. Basically, one can ignore > subject and title differences as now by setting > org-koma-letter-prefer-subject to t and not use the SUBJECT keyword. > > I have se

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-01-25 Thread Rasmus
Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Rasmus writes: > >> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> I finally had the time to fix these old patches. Sorry about the wait. >>> >>> You should update Org first. I modified large parts of ox-koma-letter.el >>> recently so your patches will probably not ap

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-01-18 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Rasmus writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >>> I finally had the time to fix these old patches. Sorry about the >>> wait. >> >> You should update Org first. I modified large parts of ox-koma-letter.el >> recently so your patches will probably not apply. Also, some parts are >> not necessary any

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-01-18 Thread Rasmus
Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> I finally had the time to fix these old patches. Sorry about the >> wait. > > You should update Org first. I modified large parts of ox-koma-letter.el > recently so your patches will probably not apply. Also, some parts are > not necessary anymore. I did. . . And I f

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-01-18 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Rasmus writes: > I finally had the time to fix these old patches. Sorry about the > wait. You should update Org first. I modified large parts of ox-koma-letter.el recently so your patches will probably not apply. Also, some parts are not necessary anymore. Regards, -- Nicolas Goazio

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2014-01-18 Thread Rasmus
Alan, I finally had the time to fix these old patches. Sorry about the wait. Alan Schmitt writes: > Hello, >> Attached are a couple of changes to ox-koma-letter following a recent >> bug report by James. >> >> 1. Minor fixes around. The way subject-format was handled before was >>ugly. U

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2013-11-25 Thread Michael Strey
Hi Rasmus, ras...@gmx.us writes: [...] > 3. When studying the KOMA manual to answer James' second question I >came across the komavar title which is currently not supported. I >have added support for a separate SUBJECT keyword. The heuristic >is something like this (i) if title and

[O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter] changed-in-buffer, subject, minor fixes

2013-11-24 Thread Rasmus
Hi all, Attached are a couple of changes to ox-koma-letter following a recent bug report by James. 1. Minor fixes around. The way subject-format was handled before was ugly. Updated some docstrings etc. 2. better test of whether values have changed in the buffer. I think Alan added this

[O] [patch][ox-koma-letter] checkdoc compatible (was: [patch][ox-koma-letter] set opening via headline)

2013-08-17 Thread Rasmus
> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> (defcustom org-koma-letter-opening nil >> - "Letter's opening, as a string." >> + "Letter's opening, as a string. If (1) this value is nil; (2) > > Please start a new line after the first sentence. This patch changes some docstrings to make ox-koma-letter pass ch

Re: [O] [patch][ox-koma-letter] set opening via headline

2013-08-17 Thread Rasmus
Hi, Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> With the following patch one can set the opening via a headline. >> Currently, it's pretty conservative and will only set opening if it >> isn't set already. I'm open to discussion on that point. > > Here are some comments about its internals. Thanks! I appreci

Re: [O] [patch][ox-koma-letter] set opening via headline

2013-08-17 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Rasmus writes: > With the following patch one can set the opening via a headline. > Currently, it's pretty conservative and will only set opening if it > isn't set already. I'm open to discussion on that point. Here are some comments about its internals. > (defcustom org-koma-letter-o

[O] [patch][ox-koma-letter] set opening via headline

2013-08-17 Thread Rasmus
Hi, With the following patch one can set the opening via a headline. Currently, it's pretty conservative and will only set opening if it isn't set already. I'm open to discussion on that point. With this patch, the following example: --8<---cut here---start->

Re: [O] [patch][ox-koma-letter] missing backtick

2013-07-26 Thread Bastien
Rasmus writes: > There's a missing backtick in a function. I could swear it used to be > there. . . Applied, thanks! -- Bastien

[O] [patch][ox-koma-letter] missing backtick

2013-07-26 Thread Rasmus
Hi, There's a missing backtick in a function. I could swear it used to be there. . . –Rasmus -- This is the kind of tedious nonsense up with which I will not put>From b6cdbb74fc4f2bb6d1e497a932d33c640e2f2bc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: rasmus Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:20:41 +0200 Subject:

Re: [O] [patch][ox-koma-letter] Support for to and from headings

2013-06-12 Thread Rasmus
Alan Schmitt writes: > I applied the patches (just changing a small typo in the changelog). Thanks, let me know if any errors pop up. –Rasmus -- When in doubt, do it!

Re: [O] [patch][ox-koma-letter] Support for to and from headings

2013-06-12 Thread Alan Schmitt
Hi Rasmus, Rasmus writes: > Rasmus writes: > >> Rasmus writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Some more patches that should work against the master branch. >>> >>> Patch 1: bug fixes. Most notably use symbols some places rather than >>> strings. >>> >>> Patch 2 adds support for TO and FROM headings. If y

Re: [O] [patch][ox-koma-letter] Support for to and from headings

2013-06-11 Thread Rasmus
Rasmus writes: > Rasmus writes: > >> Hi, >> >> Some more patches that should work against the master branch. >> >> Patch 1: bug fixes. Most notably use symbols some places rather than >> strings. >> >> Patch 2 adds support for TO and FROM headings. If you've got time for >> testing I would app

Re: [O] [patch][ox-koma-letter] Support for to and from headings

2013-06-04 Thread Rasmus
Bastien, >> * ox-koma-letter.el: If tag wasn't given a headline could cause >> trouble. >> * ox-koma-letter.el: bug in subject-format defcustom. >> * ox-koma-letter.el: some newline changes >> * ox-koma-letter.el: changed varioues (sic) quoted things to symbols. > > You need to tell what functio

Re: [O] [patch][ox-koma-letter] Support for to and from headings

2013-06-04 Thread Bastien
Hi Rasmus, Rasmus writes: > * ox-koma-letter.el: If tag wasn't given a headline could cause > trouble. > * ox-koma-letter.el: bug in subject-format defcustom. > * ox-koma-letter.el: some newline changes > * ox-koma-letter.el: changed varioues quoted things to symbols. You need to tell what fu

Re: [O] [patch][ox-koma-letter] Support for to and from headings

2013-06-03 Thread Rasmus
Rasmus writes: > Hi, > > Some more patches that should work against the master branch. > > Patch 1: bug fixes. Most notably use symbols some places rather than > strings. > > Patch 2 adds support for TO and FROM headings. If you've got time for > testing I would appreciate feedback. It's expla

[O] [patch][ox-koma-letter] Support for to and from headings

2013-06-01 Thread Rasmus
Hi, Some more patches that should work against the master branch. Patch 1: bug fixes. Most notably use symbols some places rather than strings. Patch 2 adds support for TO and FROM headings. If you've got time for testing I would appreciate feedback. It's explained in the top of the patch.

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter]: sender, email and cleanup

2013-05-27 Thread Xavier Garrido
Hi Viktor, Please check the values of `org-koma-letter-email' and `org-koma-letter-author'. They should be set to nil if you have these settings defined in an LCO file and do not want to set them in the generated TeX sources. I use such a setup and the latest master branch is working for me. O

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter]: sender, email and cleanup

2013-05-27 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
Hi Xavier, Xavier Garrido wrote: > Hi koma-letterers, > > >>Patches: > >> > >>1. summarizes all changes in author. It uses my solution as mentioned > >>above. > >>2. full support for after closing keywords. See commit message > >>3. signature to nil > >>4. change handling of subject and allow

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter]: sender, email and cleanup

2013-05-27 Thread Rasmus
Hi Xavier, >>> 1. summarizes all changes in author. It uses my solution as mentioned >>> above. >>> 2. full support for after closing keywords. See commit message >>> 3. signature to nil >>> 4. change handling of subject and allow for setting subject in >>> OPTION-line. >> >> I'm going to appl

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter]: sender, email and cleanup

2013-05-27 Thread Xavier Garrido
Hi koma-letterers, Patches: 1. summarizes all changes in author. It uses my solution as mentioned above. 2. full support for after closing keywords. See commit message 3. signature to nil 4. change handling of subject and allow for setting subject in OPTION-line. I'm going to apply the patc

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter]: sender, email and cleanup

2013-05-26 Thread Alan Schmitt
Rasmus writes: > Viktor, > >>> 1. Viktor's latest patch. >>> 2. The patch describe above that gets user name and email and works >>> on my system. . . >> >> Your code works for me. From my point of view, the pros are that per >> default `org-koma-letter-{author,sender}' pick up the values

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter]: sender, email and cleanup

2013-05-26 Thread Rasmus
> As a side note, I had quite a few problems working with your patches. > None of them applied against master, or against my latest patch as you > claimed. I had to merge in some of the changes of 0002 by hand. I > suggest that we nail down the workings of AUTHOR and EMAIL first (should > be done

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter]: sender, email and cleanup

2013-05-26 Thread Rasmus
Viktor Rosenfeld writes: > I'm also not a big fan of the title defaulting to the filename. But I > think it is a minor issue. What I think is quite useful is setting the > subject to the headline of the exported subtree. Wouldn't we also lose > this if subject is nil? Without knowing the details

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter]: sender, email and cleanup

2013-05-26 Thread Rasmus
Viktor, >> 1. Viktor's latest patch. >> 2. The patch describe above that gets user name and email and works >> on my system. . . > > Your code works for me. From my point of view, the pros are that per > default `org-koma-letter-{author,sender}' pick up the values of > `user-full-name' an

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter]: sender, email and cleanup

2013-05-26 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
Hi Rasmus, Rasmus wrote: > Rasmus writes: > > > 4. Sets defcustom org-koma-letter-signature nil since that > > corresponds to default scrlttr2 behavior anyway (p. 183 in the > > manual). > > > > Re 4.: I'd like to do something similar to > > org-koma-letter-subject-format. But I'm

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter]: sender, email and cleanup (was: [PATCH] ox-koma-letter.el: Reintroduce variables removed in commit 832c6fd with proper defaults)

2013-05-26 Thread Viktor Rosenfeld
Hi Rasmus, Rasmus wrote: > Attached are three patches that goes on top of Viktor's latest patch > (I've also attached it here since I rebased stuff and might have > changed it by accident). > > 1. Viktor's latest patch. > 2. The patch describe above that gets user name and email and works >

Re: [O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter]: sender, email and cleanup

2013-05-25 Thread Rasmus
Rasmus writes: > 4. Sets defcustom org-koma-letter-signature nil since that > corresponds to default scrlttr2 behavior anyway (p. 183 in the > manual). > > Re 4.: I'd like to do something similar to > org-koma-letter-subject-format. But I'm not sure how, at the moment > (perhaps make

[O] [PATCH][ox-koma-letter]: sender, email and cleanup (was: [PATCH] ox-koma-letter.el: Reintroduce variables removed in commit 832c6fd with proper defaults)

2013-05-25 Thread Rasmus
Dear Viktor and Alan, > Hmm, that's too bad. I tested it pretty thoroughly. Could you maybe > trace the contents of the variable by adding calls to message in > various places? I tried to figure it out. For some reason it kept resetting my name to "". > Did you send the patch? I did not receiv

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-06 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Alan Schmitt writes: > Michael Strey writes: > >> Here is a draft proposal for a user interface using Nicola's suggestion: > > I like this. About the :BODY: tag, do we really need it if it's > optional? Also, do we enfore the order: what if there is a section after > we start on the ENCL

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-06 Thread Alan Schmitt
Michael Strey writes: > Here is a draft proposal for a user interface using Nicola's suggestion: I like this. About the :BODY: tag, do we really need it if it's optional? Also, do we enfore the order: what if there is a section after we start on the ENCL or PS tags? Alan

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-05 Thread Michael Strey
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 01:23:40PM +0100, Rasmus wrote: [...] > What happens to headlines without a tag? Would they be > read as part of the body or would untagged headliens just be ignored? Untagged sections shall be treated as body. Updated proposal: #+BEGIN_SRC org #+LATEX_CLASS: letter #+

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-05 Thread Rasmus
Michael Strey writes: > Here is a draft proposal for a user interface using Nicola's > suggestion: Looks nice. What happens to headlines without a tag? Would they be read as part of the body or would untagged headliens just be ignored? –Rasmus -- This is the kind of tedious nonsense up with

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-05 Thread Michael Strey
Hello, On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:38:38PM +0100, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: [...] > Headlines are also possible, with a :location: property, which could be > set to, e.g. "closing". See also: > > http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-e-groff-documentation.html > > for a syntax based on headl

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-05 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Alan Schmitt writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Headlines are also possible, with a :location: property, which could be >> set to, e.g. "closing". See also: >> >> http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-e-groff-documentation.html >> >> for a syntax based on headlines. >> >> Anothe

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-05 Thread Alan Schmitt
Hello, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Headlines are also possible, with a :location: property, which could be > set to, e.g. "closing". See also: > > http://orgmode.org/worg/org-tutorials/org-e-groff-documentation.html > > for a syntax based on headlines. > > Another possibility is to use a special

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-04 Thread Rasmus
Michael Strey writes: > So where is the problem with PS? > > BTW: Do you use PS in printed letters? Yes. Recently: "PS: If you need to contact me via snail mail in country X do send it to this C/O-address " –Rasmus -- Powered by magic pixies!

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-04 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Rasmus writes: > Alan Schmitt writes: > >> #+AFTER_CLOSING: text that goes after closing, such as \ps{my ps} >> >> What worries me about this is that we'll probably want something with >> paragraphs. Is it possible? If not, could the approach taken with >> footnotes be also allowed here?

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-04 Thread Alan Schmitt
Michael Strey writes: > Hi Alan, > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:19:58AM +0100, Alan Schmitt wrote: > > [...] > >> So I guess the only part of the letter design I'm worried about is >> having a 'ps' with several paragraphs. > > The option below makes an opening with two paragraphs. > > #+BEGIN_SRC

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-04 Thread Michael Strey
Hi Alan, On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:19:58AM +0100, Alan Schmitt wrote: [...] > So I guess the only part of the letter design I'm worried about is > having a 'ps' with several paragraphs. The option below makes an opening with two paragraphs. #+BEGIN_SRC org #+OPENING: Sehr geehrter Herr Meier,

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-04 Thread Rasmus
Alan Schmitt writes: > #+AFTER_CLOSING: text that goes after closing, such as \ps{my ps} > > What worries me about this is that we'll probably want something with > paragraphs. Is it possible? If not, could the approach taken with > footnotes be also allowed here? With my suggestion you could si

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-04 Thread Alan Schmitt
Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Alan Schmitt writes: > >> So I guess the only part of the letter design I'm worried about is >> having a 'ps' with several paragraphs. (I guess it's related to the footnote >> with multiple paragraphs questions, but I guess the two blank lines >> approach is o

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-04 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Alan Schmitt writes: > So I guess the only part of the letter design I'm worried about is > having a 'ps' with several paragraphs. (I guess it's related to the footnote > with multiple paragraphs questions, but I guess the two blank lines > approach is only for footnotes.) I have trouble

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-03 Thread Alan Schmitt
Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Alan Schmitt writes: > >> Rasmus writes: >> >>> Export the following to LaTeX: >>> >>> #+BEGIN_SRC Org >>> #+TITLE:test >>> #+LATEX_HEADER:\newcommand{test}{\textsc{ps}:this is a test} >>> #+LATEX_HEADER:\newcommand{ttest}{\textsc{ps}\:this is a t

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-03 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Alan Schmitt writes: > Rasmus writes: > >> Export the following to LaTeX: >> >> #+BEGIN_SRC Org >> #+TITLE:test >> #+LATEX_HEADER:\newcommand{test}{\textsc{ps}:this is a test} >> #+LATEX_HEADER:\newcommand{ttest}{\textsc{ps}\:this is a test} >> #+LATEX_HEADER:\newcommand{tttest}{\textsc{p

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-03 Thread Alan Schmitt
Rasmus writes: > Export the following to LaTeX: > > #+BEGIN_SRC Org > #+TITLE:test > #+LATEX_HEADER:\newcommand{test}{\textsc{ps}:this is a test} > #+LATEX_HEADER:\newcommand{ttest}{\textsc{ps}\:this is a test} > #+LATEX_HEADER:\newcommand{tttest}{\textsc{ps}\\:this is a test} > #+LATEX_HEADER:\ne

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-02 Thread Rasmus
Alan Schmitt writes: > Rasmus writes: > >> Alan Schmitt writes: >> >> > As the order matters, as said in some replies, I prefer the >> > AFTER_CLOSING approach. >> >> How can one use the a `:' in a AFTER_CLOSEing? > > Sorry, I don't know. I thought it was the approach you were > suggesting. Exp

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-02 Thread Alan Schmitt
Rasmus writes: > Alan Schmitt writes: > > > As the order matters, as said in some replies, I prefer the > > AFTER_CLOSING approach. > > How can one use the a `:' in a AFTER_CLOSEing? Sorry, I don't know. I thought it was the approach you were suggesting. > > I rely on an lco for that. To give y

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-02 Thread Bastien
Hi Alan, Alan Schmitt writes: > Bastien writes: > >> Hi Alan, >> >> Alan Schmitt writes: >> >>> To give you an idea of my setup, here it is. >> >> This is nice -- would you share it on Worg? > > Sure. Should it go there : > http://orgmode.org/worg/exporters/index.html ? Yes, please. Thanks,

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-02 Thread Rasmus
Alan Schmitt writes: > As the order matters, as said in some replies, I prefer the > AFTER_CLOSING approach. How can one use the a `:' in a AFTER_CLOSEing? > I rely on an lco for that. To give you an idea of my setup, here it is. > I found that with this setup I can quickly write a letter. If

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-02 Thread Rasmus
Alan Schmitt writes: Michael Strey writes:> Rasmus, >> In fact to use the scrlttr2 support in Org I had to adjust a LCO files >> because it's currently loaded after LATEX_HEADER arguments (so all >> customization was overwritten). I didn't like that. > > After this remark I checked my changes

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-02 Thread Rasmus
Michael Strey writes:> Rasmus, >> In fact to use the scrlttr2 support in Org I had to adjust a LCO files >> because it's currently loaded after LATEX_HEADER arguments (so all >> customization was overwritten). I didn't like that. > > After this remark I checked my changes and compared them with

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-02 Thread Alan Schmitt
Bastien writes: > Hi Alan, > > Alan Schmitt writes: > >> To give you an idea of my setup, here it is. > > This is nice -- would you share it on Worg? Sure. Should it go there : http://orgmode.org/worg/exporters/index.html ? I'll send you my ssh key. Alan

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-02 Thread Bastien
Hi Alan, Alan Schmitt writes: > To give you an idea of my setup, here it is. This is nice -- would you share it on Worg? Thanks! -- Bastien

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-03-01 Thread Alan Schmitt
Hi, Sorry for not replying earlier, I've been in a mode where I let my orgmode mail accumulate. Rasmus writes: > I have changed the following objects: > > 1. Make keys sane; no reason why open pdf is O rather than o and why > k is used in place of l (as in the tex exporter). Yes, it's ni

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-02-28 Thread Michael Strey
Rasmus, On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:13:25PM +0100, Rasmus wrote: [...] > In fact to use the scrlttr2 support in Org I had to adjust a LCO files > because it's currently loaded after LATEX_HEADER arguments (so all > customization was overwritten). I didn't like that. After this remark I checked

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-02-27 Thread Rasmus
"Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Hi, > > Rasmus wrote: >>> Maybe we should write a user guide *before* further implementation >>> steps. >> >> I agree. A "question zero" is whether we eventually want to have an >> org-letter which could, in principle, output to something different >> than scrlttr2.

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-02-27 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi, Rasmus wrote: >> Maybe we should write a user guide *before* further implementation >> steps. > > I agree. A "question zero" is whether we eventually want to have an > org-letter which could, in principle, output to something different > than scrlttr2. That could be "isodoc" for which I have

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-02-27 Thread Rasmus
Michael, > I mean customized LCO files. For my former company I had made a > letter class for business letters based on scrlttr2.cls with two LCO > files. the first LCO file *company.lco* contained the general > information about the company (address, bank account, etc.). A > second LCO file *m

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-02-27 Thread Michael Strey
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:14:28PM +0100, Rasmus wrote: [...] > > Wouldn't it be better to use Markus Kohm's concept of letter class > > options to set all the static stuff? > > Potentially. What do you mean by "letter class options"? Are you > referring to customized LCO files or do you refer

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-02-26 Thread Rasmus
>> I have been working on extending the KOMA letter support in Org. The >> backend is still rough and I would like to more stuff such as >> designing firstfood and firsthead with org elements (e.g. I use a >> tabularx for my firstfood with varioues stuff). >> >> I have changed the following obj

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-02-26 Thread Michael Strey
Hi Rasmus, Thank you for sharing this patch. I have changed ox-koma-letter.el as well to fit my needs but didn't publish my changes. On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 09:25:58PM +0100, Rasmus wrote: [...] > I have been working on extending the KOMA letter support in Org. The > backend is still rough an

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-02-26 Thread Rasmus
Bastien writes: >> I have been working on extending the KOMA letter support in Org. The >> backend is still rough and I would like to more stuff such as >> designing firstfood and firsthead with org elements (e.g. I use a >> tabularx for my firstfood with varioues stuff). > > Thanks for the patc

Re: [O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-02-26 Thread Bastien
Hi Rasmus, Rasmus writes: > I have been working on extending the KOMA letter support in Org. The > backend is still rough and I would like to more stuff such as > designing firstfood and firsthead with org elements (e.g. I use a > tabularx for my firstfood with varioues stuff). Thanks for the

[O] [patch] ox-koma-letter

2013-02-25 Thread Rasmus
Hi, I have been working on extending the KOMA letter support in Org. The backend is still rough and I would like to more stuff such as designing firstfood and firsthead with org elements (e.g. I use a tabularx for my firstfood with varioues stuff). I have changed the following objects: 1. Mak