I have a basic implementation of this. Would you like to pretest it a
bit, to get the worst bugs out before I put this out?
- Carsten
On Jun 18, 2006, at 9:59, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Jun 17, 2006, at 22:47, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
I have just one final thought
On Jun 18, 2006, at 9:59, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Jun 17, 2006, at 22:47, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
I have just one final thoughtand it's just a thought because I
don't understand how org-mode is implemented
What if, instead of archiving *moving* subtrees, it l
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Jun 17, 2006, at 22:47, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
I have just one final thoughtand it's just a thought because I
don't understand how org-mode is implemented
What if, instead of archiving *moving* subtrees, it left them in place
but *hid* them in a semi-permanent
Hi Daniel,
thanks for taking the time to discuss this through.
On Jun 17, 2006, at 22:47, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
OK, so now we've come full circle -- this is very nearly the current
behavior, except instead of archiving the whole subtree, it would only
archive DONE entries from within the su
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How about a function org-archive-done, that archives any tree in the
> buffer labelled DONE?
>
> One might refine this to archive trees absolutely done, so that---even
> when a heading is labelled DONE---it looks to its subtrees to check
> whether they have no label whic
Yes, I think this would be a good idea. I'll put it on my list.
- Carsten
On Jun 14, 2006, at 9:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about a function org-archive-done, that archives any tree in the
buffer labelled DONE?
One might refine this to archive trees absolutely done, so that---even
when
How about a function org-archive-done, that archives any tree in the
buffer labelled DONE?
One might refine this to archive trees absolutely done, so that---even
when a heading is labelled DONE---it looks to its subtrees to check
whether they have no label which states the opposite.
Also, I thin
