Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Jun 17, 2006, at 22:47, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
I have just one final thought....and it's just a thought because I
don't understand how org-mode is implemented....
What if, instead of archiving *moving* subtrees, it left them in place
but *hid* them in a semi-permanent way. By that I mean, they'd be
hidden just like the collapsing org-mode normally does, but they would
never expand, unless a special show-archived-subtrees variable was
non-nil.
this is a very interesting and original idea! I really like it. It
would mean that subitems that are done remain in place, but don't use
space on the screen. I am not sure if I like the term "archiving" for
this. "Locking" seems to be better.
I'm glad you like this (and that it seems straightforward to
implement). My only questions is this: If locking is an
alternative (not replacement) to archiving, will locked items also
be kept out of agendas and exports, like when archiving? My vote
would be "yes".
Dan
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
