I have a basic implementation of this. Would you like to pretest it a
bit, to get the worst bugs out before I put this out?
- Carsten
On Jun 18, 2006, at 9:59, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Jun 17, 2006, at 22:47, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
I have just one final thought....and it's just a thought because I
don't understand how org-mode is implemented....
What if, instead of archiving *moving* subtrees, it left them in
place but *hid* them in a semi-permanent way. By that I mean,
they'd be hidden just like the collapsing org-mode normally does,
but they would never expand, unless a special show-archived-subtrees
variable was non-nil.
this is a very interesting and original idea! I really like it. It
would mean that subitems that are done remain in place, but don't use
space on the screen. I am not sure if I like the term "archiving"
for this. "Locking" seems to be better.
I'm glad you like this (and that it seems straightforward to
implement). My only questions is this: If locking is an alternative
(not replacement) to archiving, will locked items also be kept out of
agendas and exports, like when archiving? My vote would be "yes".
Dan
--
Carsten Dominik
Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek"
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Kruislaan 403
NL-1098SJ Amsterdam
phone: +31 20 525 7477
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
