Hi all,
Org 9.1.2 is out.
Enjoy!
--
Bastien
Kaushal Modi writes:
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:13 PM Haider Rizvi wrote:
> I'm getting the following error, when trying to do an org-capture.
>
> Org 9.1 onwards, bare sexp's are now allowed in the template.
>
> From ORG-NEWS:
>
> *** ~org-capture-templates~ no longer accepts S-expressions as
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 3:13 PM Haider Rizvi wrote:
> I'm getting the following error, when trying to do an org-capture.
>
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Invalid file location: nil")
> signal(error ("Invalid file location: nil"))
> error("Invalid file location: %S" nil)
> org-captur
o work fine in the
past. Flipping back to the older code for org-capture-expand-file
works fine. So I'd say this is a bug!
(emacs-version)
"GNU Emacs 26.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-apple-darwin16.7.0, NS appkit-1504.83
Version 10.12.6 (Build 16G29))
of 2017-09-13"
(org-version)
Richard Lawrence writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> About a year ago, I wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a simple way for me to say to the agenda, "Show me all (and only)
>>> the NEXT tasks that are part of a project whose deadline is before (say)
>>> 2016-11-01"? It seems like this should be possible with the b
On Wednesday, 4 Oct 2017 at 09:12, Peter Davis wrote:
[...]
> Meanwhile, I have discovered a Google charting function which gives me
> an annotated time series graph that comes very close to what I
> need. Also, I’ve had no problems exporting many other documents to
> HTML and/or PDF. So I’m afr
> On Oct 4, 2017, at 8:48 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 4 Oct 2017 at 07:49, Peter Davis wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> By the way, I just re-installed Org from the package manager, so I'm now
>> at
>>
>> Org mode version 9.1.1 (9.1.1-17-g24ea1b-elpa @
>> /Users/peterdavis/.emacs.d/elpa/o
On Wednesday, 4 Oct 2017 at 07:49, Peter Davis wrote:
[...]
> By the way, I just re-installed Org from the package manager, so I'm now
> at
>
> Org mode version 9.1.1 (9.1.1-17-g24ea1b-elpa @
> /Users/peterdavis/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20171002/)
>
> I was hoping this would fix any possible installati
On Wednesday, 4 Oct 2017 at 07:24, Peter Davis wrote:
> Ok. The original (t.org) is exactly what you posted a few days ago. This
> fails to export HTML. ("Wrong type argument")
>
> The other file (t2.org) has the empty table cells filled in, and has the
> SRC and RESULTS blocks removed. This expor
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017, at 07:24 AM, Peter Davis wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017, at 01:36 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 3 Oct 2017 at 15:28, Peter Davis wrote:
> > > Yup. I deleted the source block and the results line, and now export to
> > > HTML and PDF works with no problems.
> >
> >
Hi Nicolas,
I am not sure I understand: As I tried to make clear, I am *not* interested
in changing the UI for anybody but myself. I probably should have omitted
the "long-run" comment altogether.
What I am interested in is refactoring: add a layer of functions that
cleanly do what is now done in
* lisp/org-clock (org-clocktable-steps): Fix weekly-step clock report
ignoring hours between start of period and start of week, when start
of period is on a day of week numerically less than start of week.
Clock report now always inserts a "week" starting at the start of
the period, if nec
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017, at 01:36 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 Oct 2017 at 15:28, Peter Davis wrote:
> > Yup. I deleted the source block and the results line, and now export to
> > HTML and PDF works with no problems.
>
> Please post the complete file (t.org?) to this list.
Ok. The origi
Hello,
Omar Antolin writes:
> If you run `org-backward-paragraph` from the `#+BEGIN_SRC` line of a
> source block it gives the error message "Invalid search bound (wrong
> side of point)", instead of moving point.
Fixed. Thank you.
> This excerpt is from inside a branch of a `cond` that tests
Hello,
Ingo Lohmar writes:
> What I have in mind for starters:
>
> Add orthogonal internal functions that can handle *all* sensible
> combinations of requirements. Then rewrite existing commands in terms
> of these, but possibly adding new ones.
>
> I would not want to break any workflows, of c
15 matches
Mail list logo