Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-22 Thread Jason F. McBrayer
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mar 22, 2007, at 16:21, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: >> I'm not sure what would be better. But this reminds me that we >> need a tty compatibility binding for org-shiftcontrolright and >> org-shiftcontrolleft. > > Agh. Yes. Proposals? Well, t

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Smarter indent with C-j

2007-03-22 Thread Leo
I CC the list. On 2007-03-22, Eddward DeVilla said: > On 3/22/07, Leo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 2007-03-07, Carsten Dominik said: >> >> > Fixed, thanks. > >> > >> > - Carsten >> >> I just noticed one minor issue for check boxes. As in org 4.69: >> >>- [ ] Check box 1<--- C-j >> |

Re: [Orgmode] org-mode and longlines-mode (especially tables)

2007-03-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Mar 19, 2007, at 13:46, Alan Dove wrote: Hey, folks: I've also been using org-mode with longlines-mode, and had noticed that the two occasionally conflict. I've just developed workarounds for the bugs that affect me, mostly inserting extra carriage returns here and there to ensure the ri

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Mar 22, 2007, at 16:21, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: If you send me a complex patch, we need to get your papers with the FSF first, or I cannot install the fixes into Emacs. I already have the papers from David and Piotr, so if you plan to contribute code in the future, maybe we should go ahead

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-22 Thread Jason F. McBrayer
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thank you very much, but this is a bit tricky, so maybe I should do > this. I'd guess it would be better for you to do it. I had a look at what would be involved, and a working change would touch a lot more places in the file than I thought it would,

Re: [Orgmode] Todo-list agendas with multiple

2007-03-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Mar 21, 2007, at 15:41, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: The progress on multiple TODO sequences has reminded me of a small thing that bugs me with TODO keyword search agendas. It's not possible to have a TODO keyword search agenda that matches multiple keywords (such as SOMEDAY|MAYBE). You can in

Re: [Orgmode] Re: Org-mode 4.69

2007-03-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Mar 22, 2007, at 0:28, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 23:21 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: On Mar 21, 2007, at 15:27, Jason F. McBrayer wrote: Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: All I really need it for is multiple DONE states (e.g. COMPLETED vs. CANCELLED). T

[Orgmode] Re: Org-mode version 4.68

2007-03-22 Thread Leo
On 2007-03-13, Carsten Dominik said: > - Improvements to the date/time prompt. > > + When you move (using S-cursor keys) the cursor in the pop-up > calendar window while responding to a date/time prompt, the > prompt is updated with the new default date. Works only under >

[Orgmode] Re: What does this mean in *agenda*

2007-03-22 Thread Leo
On 2007-03-22, Carsten Dominik said: > Try "0 r" or "1 r" or "2 r" or "3 r". > > - Carsten > Ah, every nice ;) > On Mar 22, 2007, at 8:55, Leo wrote: > >> I have seen the following in buffer brought up by "C-c a t". >> >> , >> | Available with `N r': (0)ALL (1)ACTION (2)WAITING (3)DONE >> `-

[Orgmode] Re: Smarter indent with C-j

2007-03-22 Thread Leo
On 2007-03-07, Carsten Dominik said: > Fixed, thanks. > > - Carsten I just noticed one minor issue for check boxes. As in org 4.69: - [ ] Check box 1<--- C-j |<--- cursor moved here I think the following is more elegant: - [ ] Check box 1<--- C-j |<--- cursor moved here Wha

Re: [Orgmode] What does this mean in *agenda*

2007-03-22 Thread Carsten Dominik
Try "0 r" or "1 r" or "2 r" or "3 r". - Carsten On Mar 22, 2007, at 8:55, Leo wrote: I have seen the following in buffer brought up by "C-c a t". , | Available with `N r': (0)ALL (1)ACTION (2)WAITING (3)DONE ` but when I key 'N r', nothing happens. Best, -- Leo