On 30/03/19 1:31 AM, Günther J. Niederwimmer via dovecot wrote:
I have a CentOS 7 server with dovecot Repository enabled.
But it is not possible to Update with Yum Update
I have this Error?
The dovecot package is missing?
Fehler: Paket: 2:dovecot-imaptest-2.3.5.1-1.x86_64 (dovecot-2.3-latest)
On 30/03/19 10:56 PM, Gerald Galster via dovecot wrote:
Maybe there is something wrong with his local yum/repo configuration.
I'm tending to agree now.
CentOS 7 usually doesn't mix 32bit and 64bit packages anymore.
Installiert: 2:dovecot-2.3.5-1.x86_64 (Installiert = installed) ->
dovecot-2
connection lost after 100-continue ... : ok
test-http-client-errors.c:1319: Assert failed: resp->status == 200
/bin/sh: line 1: 25431 Segmentation fault ./$bin
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/builddir/build/BUILD/dovecot-2.3.6/src/lib-http'
make[3]: *** [check-l
After applying the patches in my previous message...
I'm getting the following when building dovecot for CentOS 6 (but not
for CentOS 7):
lmtp payload - normal: parallel pipelining ssl ... : ok
CLIENT: Panic: file smtp-client-connection.c: line 1309
(smtp_client_connectio
On 2/05/19 4:52 PM, Peter wrote:
After applying the patches in my previous message...
I'm getting the following when building dovecot for CentOS 6 (but not
for CentOS 7):
Any ideas on this or my other recent message?
Peter
On 7/05/19 11:08 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
CLIENT: Error: Raw backtrace:
/builddir/build/BUILD/dovecot-2.3.6/src/lib-smtp/.libs/lt-test-smtp-payload()
[0x4547ea] ->
/builddir/build/BUILD/dovecot-2.3.6/src/lib-smtp/.libs/lt-test-smtp-payload()
[0x454891] ->
/builddir/build/BUILD/dovecot-2.3.6/s
On 7/05/19 1:20 PM, Peter wrote:
Other than the raw backtrace I left quoted above, unfortunately no. When
I just tried to build it again it worked, so it's some intermitent build
issue that I can't re-produce. I'll try a few more times and see if it
fails again, though.
I ran the failed test
On 11.01.2018 13:20, Hauke Fath wrote:
>/On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:20:45 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote: />>/Was the certificate path bundled in the server certificate?
/>/No, as a separate file, provided from the local (intermediate) CA: />//>/ssl_cert = /ssl_key = /ssl_ca = //>/Worked
fine with 2.2
On 11.01.2018 13:20, Hauke Fath wrote:
>/On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:20:45 +0200, Aki Tuomi wrote: />>/Was the certificate path bundled in the server certificate?
/>/No, as a separate file, provided from the local (intermediate) CA: />//>/ssl_cert = /ssl_key = /ssl_ca = //>/Worked
fine with 2.2
The link to the latest 2.2 release points to 2.2.36.1 but the latest 2.2
is actually 2.2.36.3.
Peter
On 2/09/19 11:53 PM, bvr--- via dovecot wrote:
Sorry, there are no 2.2 binary packages on
repo.dovecot.org.
No problem, thanks for the info!
GhettoForge has 2.2 packages for CentOS / RHEL / SL, etc in the gf-plus
repostitory:
www.ghettoforge.org
Peter
> "dovecot---" == dovecot--- via dovecot writes:
>> We've changed the list dmarc mitigation to happen unconditionally
>> now.
dovecot---> What does "mitigation to happen unconditionally" mean?
dovecot---> What was changed? Are you talking about changing the
dovecot---> policy action?
You'l
On 7/04/24 02:34, lua8ds--- via dovecot wrote:
When a sender writes my email address with my username uppercase, e.g.
usern...@name.com, in the to: field of their MUA, my mail server rejects that
email. /var/log/mail.log prints:
: host mail.redacted.com[private/dovecot-lmtp] said:
550 5.
Hello,
I use Dovecot 2.3.20 on FreeBSD 13.2 (in jail) as a part of iRedMail
installation.
Some mailboxes are configured for automatic mails processing using sieve
(execute :pipe) and a custom binary (started by script). The system was
configured and was working correctly during several weeks.
Since
with the first part of the mail I've posted). Maybe it is salted, but I
don't see how to decode it...
Peter
On 09/04/2024 16:15, Doug via dovecot wrote:
-Original Message-----
From: Peter via dovecot
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 5:18 AM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Strang
vecot wrote:
That looks like base64 encoding to me. Possibly your sieve script is parsing
the output and truncating the data before handing it off to base64.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: Peter via dovecot
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 2:03 PM
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: Strange pr
On 11/04/24 00:07, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
- We do not build or test 2.3 with RHEL9, as it's not supported with 2.3
(yes, I am aware of the broken patch out there)
I assume you're referring to the OpenSSL 3 patch, can you elaborate on
why it's "broken"?
Peter
___
On 14/04/24 12:09, John Stoffel via dovecot wrote:
I think you need to update both places, so that your username and
password checks are done with lowercase usernames.
Generally speaking you want auth to be case-sensitive, but go ahead and
try it to see if it fixes the issue.
Peter
On 17/04/24 00:51, John Stoffel via dovecot wrote:
"Peter" == Peter via dovecot writes:
On 14/04/24 12:09, John Stoffel via dovecot wrote:
I think you need to update both places, so that your username and
password checks are done with lowercase usernames.
Generally speaking you
Yes, you would need to use the dovecot submission server for this:
https://doc.dovecot.org/admin_manual/submission_server/
Most people, however, use their MTA's submission server but use dovecot
for the authentication backend:
https://doc.dovecot.org/configuration_manual/howto/simple_virtual_
On 25/04/24 14:34, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote:
+1, thanks for dovecot maillist do it right, postfix maillist fails on spf
You make a confusing, factually incomplete post with claims that are
incorrect and then complain about a lack of clear response on a
different list? If you're going
On 19/05/24 04:31, Richard Rosner via dovecot wrote:
I have a mailing server setup based on Debian Stable that uses postfix
(v3.7.10) for SMTP and dovecot (v2.3.19.1 (9b53102964)) for IMAP. I now
wanted to set dovecot to not write to syslog, but to dedicated files in
/var/log/dovecot. While eve
On 20/05/24 01:55, Richard Rosner via dovecot wrote:
Am 19.05.24 um 15:29 schrieb Friedrich Kink via dovecot:
chmod 775 /var/log/dovecot will solve the problem. Without execute
permission the process can't access the logfile.
Why on earth does a process supposed to write to a file need execution
On 27/06/24 06:48, pgnd via dovecot wrote:
for anyone interested, for dovecot v2.3.14+ @ Fedora,
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dovecot/blob/rawhide/f/dovecot-2.3.14-opensslv3.patch
dovecot hums along nicely.
i've not seen a _crash_ in _many_ moons (quick looking thru ~ 18mos of
lo
On 7/08/24 07:08, Kurt Fitzner via dovecot wrote:
Hi,
I just tried to install Dovecot (version 2.3.19.1 9b53102964) on a
Debian 12 server I'm building. It failed because Dovecot's default
listen address is explicitly "*, ::" and it appears to have no logic to
determine if there actually is a
On 28/07/24 00:49, Jaco Kroon via dovecot wrote:
From what I understood from the archive and from my tests, we cannot
have multiple passwords for a given account. (I get the error: Password
query returned multiple matches)
But it looks like it can be done via a PAM module.
Does anyone succeeded
On 15/08/24 00:07, Marc via dovecot via dovecot wrote:
we are releasing a CVE patch release 2.3.21.1.
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.21.1.tar.gz
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.21.1.tar.gz.sig
Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/
Docker images in https://hub.d
On 14/08/24 23:25, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
Hi all,
we are releasing a CVE patch release 2.3.21.1.
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.21.1.tar.gz
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.21.1.tar.gz.sig
Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/
Docker images in https://hub.
On 7/09/24 00:55, Marc via dovecot wrote:
On 14/08/24 23:25, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
Hi all,
we are releasing a CVE patch release 2.3.21.1.
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.21.1.tar.gz
https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.21.1.tar.gz.sig
Binary packages in https://repo
On 12/11/24 20:18, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
There is an experimental feature in main branch, but you need to enable it
yourself for now. We are likely going to release 2.4 packages with the feature
enabled, though.
To enable, use --enable-experimental-mail-utf8 configure flag.
Is there
On 8/02/25 02:03, hi--- via dovecot wrote:
You might need to upgrade pigeonhole first. I had test failures and gone
away when upgraded pigeonhole first.
Pigeonhole hasn't even entered the picture yet. This failure is in Dovecot.
Also, I had test failures as result
of outdated bison binary, I
When attempting to build Dovecot 2.4.0 on the aarch64 platform, when
running tests...
test-file-cache.c:268: Assert failed: file_cache_set_size(cache, 1024) == -1
Panic: file test-common.c: line 222 (test_expect_error_string_n_times):
assertion failed: (expected_errors == 0)
test-common.c:256:
On 11/02/25 21:20, Timo Sirainen via dovecot wrote:
On 7. Feb 2025, at 9.48, Peter via dovecot wrote:
When attempting to build Dovecot 2.4.0 on the aarch64 platform, when running
tests...
test-file-cache.c:268: Assert failed: file_cache_set_size(cache, 1024) == -1
This test attempts to
On 10/02/25 22:41, Zakaria via dovecot wrote:
Aha, it sounds like a real bug then. Maybe you submit to bugs mailing list?
What bugs mailing list? According to
https://www.dovecot.org/bugreport-mail/ bug reports should be sent to
this list, which is exactly what I did.
Peter
_
I'm getting the following failed test:
test-var-expand.c:464: Assert failed: labs(t0 - t1) < 10
3600 < 10 is not true
var_expand(providers) :
FAILED
This test appears to be a timestamp comparison as per this comment:
/* Ensure the time
On 27/01/25 20:51, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
On 27/01/2025 08:43 EET Peter via dovecot wrote:
On 25/01/25 16:27, Peter via dovecot wrote:
I'm getting the following failed test:
test-var-expand.c:464: Assert failed: labs(t0 - t1) < 10
3600 < 10 is not true
On 25/01/25 16:27, Peter via dovecot wrote:
I'm getting the following failed test:
test-var-expand.c:464: Assert failed: labs(t0 - t1) < 10
3600 < 10 is not true
var_expand(providers) :
FAILED
This test appears to be
On 16/02/25 16:44, Joan Moreau via dovecot wrote:
It was compiling on main (becoming 2.4), but now, many things have
changed in main, and I am trying to sort out the inflated complexities.
That makes sense. Keep me informed and I'm happy to help in any way I can.
Peter
_
On 30/01/25 17:32, Joan Moreau via dovecot wrote:
Additionally, kindly note that the FTS (Full Text Search) dovecot-fst-
xapian has been also released and fully compatible with dovecot 2.4
I can't see how, it doesn't build against 2.4 at all. I've opened an
issue here:
https://github.com/gr
On 31/03/25 18:42, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
What's the purpose of the -4 in the filename? It's going to cause
issues with packaging.
Yes, this is really annoying for packaging.
the -4 comes from our build system.
That's fine, but then why are you tagging the *sources* with it?
Pete
On 29/03/25 04:45, Aki Tuomi via Dovecot-news wrote:
And unfortunately a small typo crept in, due to the small change in filenames.
Please find files at
- https://www.dovecot.org/releases/2.4/dovecot-2.4.1-4.tar.gz
- https://www.dovecot.org/releases/2.4/dovecot-2.4.1-4.tar.gz.sig
- https://pige
For those of you who get dovecot from the GhettoForge repository please
note that GhettoForge is moving to a new domain, GhettoForge.net. You
will need to take some action in order to continue to receive dovecot
updates from GhetttoForge. For further information please see:
http://www.ghettof
Hello All,
i hope everyone is well!
i have a rather irksome and pressing issue that i can't seem to resolve..
This happens only on iOS devices..
Specifically, the problem is that the content of messages seems to timeout when
it loads either when you open a message, or when you hit reply or forw
43 matches
Mail list logo
