the FS on
the partition is UFS.
Greg
here is what is printed
after 30 minutes :
$ ./concurency
writing, page size = 8192
4: reading, page size = 8192
3: reading, page size = 8192
2: reading, page size = 8192
0: reading, page size = 8192
1: reading, page size = 8192
Cheers,
Greg
Le jeudi 09 août 2007 09:47, Sebastian Ganschow a écrit :
> But if the user creates his own rules, he also needs to create the spam
> rule. Otherwise his spam won't be delivered to the spam folder. I'm not
> really sure, if this is the solution i'd like to have.
Why not include a default sieve scr
On Sat, 2018-12-08 at 11:03 +0100, Marco Fioretti wrote:
> Greetings,
> I have had to reinstall my email server on another Linux (centos 7.6)
> VPS, with a newer version of dovecot, other software and a brand new
> letsencrypt certificate just for email withpostfix and dovecot (that
> certificate w
:54:A5:E9:42:F1:7A:4D:3D:EB:4E:90:D0:07:28:1B:2F:16:A1:BE:45:2C:B6:68:AE:1E
- Options: safe renegotiation,
- Handshake was completed
- Simple Client Mode:
* OK [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE IDLE
AUTH=PLAIN AUTH=CRAM-MD5] Dovecot ready.
. logout
- Peer has closed the GnuTLS connection
--
Greg
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Default
--
Greg
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry, the output didn't format properly. The takeaway fields are as follows:
Last Modified : 2020-08-18 19:46:12
Last IMAP : 2021-03-04 10:52:03
Last POP3 : None
Last Delivery : 2021-03-04 10:26:49
--
Greg
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally s
On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 10:54 +0100, Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> This is pretty wild. Is that perl sorcery ?
Used to be but as I migrated to a new server I thought I would use
python this time around.
--
Greg
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
, and set all the particulars there.
Recent versions of Outlook have a stripped down configuration interface that
offers no flexibility. For example, from Outlook itself it's not possible to
set an IMAP login name that's not an email address.
--
Greg
certs &&
openssl s_client -connect remote.server:143 -starttls imap -showcerts &0 |
H=$(openssl x509 -hash -out imap.pem) &&
ln -sf imap.pem ${H}.0
# ls -l
total 5
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel11 Nov 23 15:34 3a82ab1a.0 -> imap.pem
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1371 Nov 23 15:34 imap.pem
--
Greg Rivers
On Saturday, September 09, 2017 10:01:03 Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Neomutt.
> https://www.neomutt.org/
>
Also alpine.
https://www.washington.edu/alpine/
--
Greg Rivers
on product (Red Hat Certificate Server) that
is EOL, etc.
Is there any way to mitigate this issue?
(The only thing I can think of is to upgrade the Dovecot server to RHEL
8 and restrict connections to only TLSv1.3, but that ain't gonna happen
overnight.)
Thanks,
- Greg
,
I'm not really sure why you think it's a configuration error, but I'll
attach the "dovecot -n" output.
Thanks,
- Greg
# 2.3.15 (0503334ab1): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.5.15 (e6a84e31)
# OS: Linux 3.10.0-1160.53.1.el7.x86_64 x86_64
always aborts before completion with the following error:
dsync(gcr): Panic: file mail-transaction-log.c: line 271
(mail_transaction_log_rotate): assertion failed: (file->locked)
The exit code is 262. Does anyone know why this might happen or how to
fix it?
--
Greg Rivers# 2.2.15: /usr/local/
-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 382368 Nov 11 15:03 /bin/csh*
118 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 142184 Nov 11 15:03 /bin/sh*
108 -r-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 382368 Nov 11 15:03 /bin/tcsh*
--
Greg Rivers
WHEN 'xmpp-client' THEN ma.XMPP_allowed = 'YES' \
ELSE ma.IMAP_allowed = 'YES' \
END
Should the %{listener} variable work in this case ?
--
Greg
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
rned that we might be dropping more mail. Thoughts
anyone?
Thank you in advance for your help. I greatly appreciate it!
-- Greg
__
Greg Woods
Cirrus Aviation Services
702-448-2366
702-343-7784 (mobile)
ca1:cur root# /usr/sbin/dovecotd --version
1.1.20apple0.5
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> SSH recently added this enhancement to address this common need:
>>
>> GSSAPIStrictAcceptorCheck
>> Determines whether to be strict about the identity of the
>> GSSAPI acceptor a client authenticates
>> against. If “y
[dovecot closing connections to gnus, making gnus fail to exit group]
I use gnus and I think that the closed connection happens to me once in
a while. gnus just reopens it - I'm running the head of Gnus CVS. So
this feels like a gnus bug.
include system-auth
account include system-auth
session include system-auth
At this point I seem to be out of options. I've been through the docs, and
trawled the internet.
Anyone know what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks,
Greg
---
> I tried fiddling with PAM by adding an /etc/pam.d/apop file with these
> contents :
It's impossible to support anything but plaintext authentication with
PAM. See http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/Mechanisms and
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/PasswordSchemes
I'm not overly worri
I have been using dovecot with gnus for a long time. Recently, I
started getting failures, and I think it's a dovecot problem triggered
by gnus being more aggressive, but I'd like to hear opinions about
whether I should pursue this as a gnus bug.
The log shows:
Oct 25 19:27:36 gdtserver dovecot
On 28/10/2010 12:22 μμ, Spyros Tsiolis wrote:
--- On Thu, 28/10/10, Johan Hendriks wrote:
Hello all.
I am reading the mailinglist for a long time now, and there
was a thread i believe called webgui or something.
In this thread there was a company i believe german, that
was working on a dovec
Timo Sirainen writes:
> On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 16:57 +, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 19:42 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> > Oct 25 19:27:36 gdtserver dovecot: IMAP(gdt): Panic: Trying to
>> > close mailbox foo.bar with open transactions
>&g
Hi all,
I'm trying to get postfix and dovecot working nicely together to process and
store mail for both local (system) on one domain and virtual users and a few
different domains.
I've got postfix up and running quite nicely, but am having a few problems with
Dovecot. Every time postfix trie
Hi Timo,
Thanks very much for spotting this... 4 hours spent tweaking the wrong
config... Doh! :-).
All working now.
:wq
On 8 Mar 2010, at 22:35, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 22:06 +0000, Greg Frith wrote:
>> gr...@rhy:/etc/dovecot$ sudo dovecot -n
>>
lain to me how the two files are meant to
work in harmony together, or confirm that I won't cause myself any problems
further down the line by removing dovecot-postfix.conf?
Sorry to bug the list with such amateurish questions :-).
Cheers,
Greg.
On 8 Mar 2010, at 22:35, Timo Sirainen wrote:
and configuring the
individual components yourself!
:wq.
On 9 Mar 2010, at 16:50, Pascal Volk wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 05:02 PM Greg Frith wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Sorry, I thought a migration to /etc/dovecot/dovecot-postfix.conf would do
>> the trick, but it would appea
Hi,
would it be possible to prevent users who try to login from an
unresolved IP from connecting to Dovecot IMAP?
I have a suspicion that it should be done via the authentication module
(ie PAM) but I am not sure (if this is the case could someone recommend
a good resource or even a solution).
Hi,
I am using Dovecot with mbox format, and I am interested to move to
Maildir. I have run the modified script (mb2md) but it seems UIDs are
not preserved. I don't know how to verify this, but my client seems to
be downloading all messages again.
Can someone help?
Hi,
using PAM, how can I configure how many attempts a user can make to
connect, and if exceeding a certain number, block him for a specified
amount of time?
Any idea what the defaults are?
You could use fail2ban, see also: http://wiki.dovecot.org/HowTo/Fail2Ban
So I guess the result would be to the login process become unresponsive,
right? I am not sure this would be what I want. The desired behaviour
for me would be to reject the connection even if the password becomes
correct
Hi,
I have just switched to Maildir, and I have noticed something. Even
though it works properly, I have noticed that a file named
/var/mail/user
with 0 bytes length is still created. Is this normal?
I use sendmail+procmail+dovecot. I have also tried the combined
procmail+deliver approach wi
It stopped being a problem for me anyway because I changed some config
in my MTA (Exim4) for another reason which happened to mean that
Procmail was no longer invoked in most cases.
But I think it may be fixable in the Procmail space.
What is in your /etc/procmailrc ?
Quite simple at the mo
I have a local Dovecot 1.1.4 running. I have a big number of outlook express
messages that I like to put into Maildir so that I can use Dovecot's imap to
access. I can convert them into mbox format. any available means for me to
import outlook express/mbox messages into Maildir/Dovecot? comma
sieve.log
sieve: info: started log at Jan 05 23:57:21.
main script: line 5: info: DEBUG: EnvelopeTo=gcr, EnvelopeFrom=g...@tharned.org.
main script: line 9: info: DEBUG: EnvelopeToUser=gcr, EnvelopeToDetail=.
info: msgid=<201401060557.s065umym069...@tharned.org>: stored mail into mailbox
'INBOX'.
$ exit
Script done on Sun Jan 5 23:57:55 2014
--
Greg Rivers
y message:
LOCAL_CONFIG
H?${u}?X-Original-To: $u
--
Greg Rivers
header of
your choice) when lda_original_recipient_header is defined, I think one
would say that dovecot LMTP does already support this natively.
So it's not really a hack, it's just a matter of setting the dovecot
config variable and ensuring that the MTA adds the corresponding header to
On Wed, 8 Jan 2014, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
On 8-01-14 5:46 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-07 9:20 PM, Greg Rivers wrote:
So for the archives, to get sieve's "envelope :detail ..." working
with sendmail and dovecot LMTP, do the following:
1) Add "lda_origi
On Wed, 8 Jan 2014, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2014-01-08 2:27 PM, Greg Rivers wrote:
Given that LMTP does in fact parse X-Original-To (or any other header
of your choice) when lda_original_recipient_header is defined, I think
one would say that dovecot LMTP does already support this natively
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014, Greg Rivers wrote:
[snip]
So for the archives, to get sieve's "envelope :detail ..." working with
sendmail and dovecot LMTP, do the following:
1) Add "lda_original_recipient_header = X-Original-To" t
preserved,
otherwise it is the duty of the map to preserve the detail.
If I read the traces (attached) correctly, the +detail makes it unscathed
through the maps, aliases, and rule sets. If that's the case, it would
indicate that the problem is with sendmail's LMTP code. Do you concur?
R< error : $* > $*$: $>MailerToTriple < error : $1 > $2 no host
extension
R< $~[ : $+ > $+ $: $>MailerToTriple < $1 : $2 > $3 < @ $2 >
R< $+ > $+$@ $>MailerToTriple < $1 > $2 < @ $1 >
Perhaps I should file this as a bug at sendmail.org?
--
Greg
ood advise.
Thanks for looking at it and for your really useful suggestions.
(BTW, options a through e is five ways, not four. :-)
I'll keep this thread updated with my findings.
--
Greg
ution.
Because of that, I am using dovecot LDA instead of LMTP until I can write
a custom sendmail ruleset to pass +detail to LMTP. Here's my sendmail LDA
configuration ($h contains the detail part of the ID):
FEATURE(`local_procmail', `/usr/local/libexec/dovecot/dovecot-lda',
`dovecot-lda -a $u+$h -d $u')
--
Greg
m)
Thanks & regards,
Greg.
than
inter-account moves, which of course is a copy & delete)
Thanks so far.
Client is Postbox & Thunderbird on Windows. (I realise Postbox is based on
Thunderbird)
Greg.
On 4 August 2014 22:03, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.08.2014 um 14:00 schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> >
d
ask for entire conversation moves to be atomic as well. (which is really
what I want)
Looks like a bloatware - sorry - helpdesk system - is what I will need to
use.
Greg.
On 4 August 2014 22:44, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On 04 Aug 2014, at 14:12, Greg Sullivan
> wrote:
>
> >
tems and
"collaborative inbox" products.
Greg.
On 06/08/2014 2:11 am, "Timo Sirainen" wrote:
> Note that MOVE isn't atomic even between moving within one user's folders.
> The MOVE RFC itself also doesn't say anything about it ever having to be
> atomic. Altho
allows multiple clients
simultaneously connected to the same mailbox, and through flags stored on
the server, different clients accessing the same mailbox at the same or
different times can detect state changes made by other clients.
Regards,
Greg.
On 6 August 2014 04:00, Jochen Bern wrote:
>
I am running
NetBSD/i386 3.1ish and 4.0ish
dovecot 1.0.0
procmail delivering into maildirs
gnus from CVS head
emacs 21.4
thunderbird 2
gnome mail-notification 4
configured to required SSL.
Basically everything works fine except that in gnus typing 'g' in the
*Group* buffer, whic
Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Note: The STATUS command is intended to access the
>status of mailboxes other than the currently selected
>mailbox. Because the STATUS command can cause the
>mailbox to be opened internally, and because thi
OPYRIGHT won't hurt at all.
I realize the doc dir is not necessarily the same; it would be nice to
have a --with-docdir to set it for the preference of various packaging
systems, but not a big deal.
Greg
I'm not sure what you expect to happen, but:
fnord gdt 18 ~ > ./concurrency
0: reading, page size = 4096
writing, page size = 4096
4: reading, page size = 4096
3: reading, page size = 4096
2: reading, page size = 4096
1: reading, page size = 4096
open(): No such file or directory
open(): No such
Sorry if this is a repeat query.
I am running dovecot 1.0.2 under NetBSD/i386 (3.1 and 4.0ish). I use
maildirs, and deliver into them with procmail. For clients I use Gnus
(CVS head) mostly and thunderbird, and also the gnome mail-notification
status applet (4.0).
Gnus fixed a bug in the last f
On Fri, 2019-09-06 at 17:25 -0700, remo--- via dovecot wrote:
> What is the best way to adopt multiple certs?
I have a setup that creates letsencrypt certs for each customer domain.
To automate this I have the following at the end of conf.d/10-ssl.conf
!include ssl.d/*.conf
This includes any
n using the aformentioned config for the last
couple of years.
--
Greg
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
any wisdom about that would be gratefully received.
thanks in advance, and thanks for the software.
Greg Minshall
58 matches
Mail list logo
