What I have understand, you are able in configuration to reject transactions
with those that doesn't present a valid certificate.
Ergo, they can connect, but they can't do anything.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För Hristo Venev
Skickat: den 27 mars 2021 00:
I have a sieve filter called "sent.sieve"
Where I just do this:
discard;
Then in sieve settings:
plugin {
sieve_plugins = sieve_imapsieve sieve_extprograms
sieve_global_extensions = +vnd.dovecot.execute
sieve_execute_bin_dir = /usr/bin/
imapsieve_mailbox2_name = Sent
imapsieve_mailbox2
.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För André Rodier
Skickat: den 4 april 2021 13:57
Till: Dovecot Mailing List
Ämne: Re: Sv: Avoid duplicate emails in the sent folder
Thanks, Sebastian.
I just tried this, but it is working too well.
If I want to import emails from
move into Sent folder.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För André Rodier
Skickat: den 4 april 2021 14:10
Till: Dovecot Mailing List
Ämne: Re: Sv: Sv: Avoid duplicate emails in the sent folder
Hello Sebastian,
On Sun, 2021-04-04 at 14:00 +0200, Sebastian wrote:
ernally in the
same acount, to the Sent folder).
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För André Rodier
Skickat: den 4 april 2021 14:10
Till: Dovecot Mailing List
Ämne: Re: Sv: Sv: Avoid duplicate emails in the sent folder
Hello Sebastian,
On Sun, 2021-04-04 at 14:00
ör André Rodier
Skickat: den 4 april 2021 14:40
Till: Dovecot Mailing List
Ämne: Re: Sv: Sv: Sv: Avoid duplicate emails in the sent folder
On Sun, 2021-04-04 at 14:31 +0200, Sebastian wrote:
> Also another important thing to take in consideration:
>
> An email that is sent outgoing from an SM
Why? Isn't it better to fix misbehaving clients server-side?
For example, some clients I have (OEM built-in clients) are for example putting
the date 1970-01-01 on all outgoing emails (and also on incoming emails which
lacks a Date: header) causing them to land at the bottom of the inbox view an
27;t
have race conditions for now. I prefer doing this than createing a secondary
Sent folder.
On Sun, 2021-04-04 at 14:43 +0200, Sebastian wrote:
> Why won't it work to just, as I said, create a separate folder, like
> Sent2, which you use as a "midpoint" to land all your ex
But whats specified for MX isn't neccessarly the endpoint endusers should
use as their incoming/outgoing servers, especially if the MX is routed
through a external spamfiltering service.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För @lbutlr
Skickat: den 30 april 2021 09:
Main problem is that not many clients do natively support multifactor.
Some clients, do popup a login dialog if the server rejects the password as
invalid, which can be used to create a "cheaty variant" of multifactor, but
some clients just popup an error dialog and tell the user to just correct
sprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För White,
Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[NICS]
Skickat: den 15 juli 2021 12:21
Till: Dovecot Mailing List
Ämne: function for whitelisting IPs
Sebastian,
Do you have any examples of such a function and how/where it is used ?
-Origin
The thing is, that people must stop expecting "being able to access mail
whenever you are" without extra steps.
Best solution is to offer a webmail with TOTP or SQRL or similiar secure auth
method.
Then have that webmail adds IP or country into trusted list, so if you want to
access IMAP mail
ntry.
That reduces the attack surface greatly.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För White,
Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[NICS]
Skickat: den 15 juli 2021 12:21
Till: Dovecot Mailing List
Ämne: function for whitelisting IPs
Sebastian,
Do you have any examples of s
>>Reply-to and From are both listed twice
This is called "oversigning" and means that a null variant of Reply-To: and
From: are signed too,
preventing adding additional headers of Reply-To: And From:.
This is particular important for headers that are permitted to be in a email
multiple times, a
On 04/12/17 23:15, Steve Litt wrote:
On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:53:15 -0800 (PST)
Joseph Tam wrote:
"Davide Marchi" writes:
UW-IMAP's mailutil, imapsync, YippieMove and Larch.
Whatever you use, *don't* use UW-IMAP's mailutil unless you got lots
of time to kill. It is dreadfully slow -- I used
I've had a number of Dovecot installs happily running for quite a few
years now, but I've just stumbled over a new issue. I am trying to get
some iPhones to do server-side email searches through
ActiveSync/Exchange protocol -> Horde -> Dovecot.
The bit I can't figure out is if I need to enable
I use dovecot-lda to deliver incoming email from Exim to Dovecot.
After having some problems with email bounces with empty envelope sender
not being delivered because of an empty -f argument, I discovered that
Exim can pass email to Dovecot using dovecot-lda without using the -f
argument at al
Yes, but not many client support it.
Use a IP locking solution instead, where the 2FA solution is used to approve
IPs for the account instead.
Originalmeddelande Från: The Doctor
Datum: 2020-08-24 14:07 (GMT+01:00) Till: dovecot@dovecot.org Ämne: 2 factor
authentication Is 2
No. Many think that sensitive data is prohibited to process/store as email
at all, but thats not true. What can be prohibited, is sending sensitive
data as email, ergo letting it leave as SMTP email, depending on
circumstances, because that might mean that the sensitive data is sent
unencrypted.
Or
Thats because in your example the data is sent outside the facility to a
third party (in this case, wetransfer/outlook)
And wetransfer/outlook is operated in third countries, which can cause GDPR
problems as the legal protection for the data disappears.
The OP were asking about a solution which mo
cked/prohibited, you can even use email to send super sensitive
details.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För Marc
Roos
Skickat: den 6 oktober 2020 23:42
Till: dovecot ; sebastian
Ämne: RE: SV: How to Modify Message and add more Attachments
>
>Thats b
Yes, putting the From: into Reply-To: is a good idea to ensure the reply
button in receiver´s client doesn't break.
But remember to ONLY do it when Reply-To: is not present.
To avoid removing important information from the email, like the original
sender, it can be good to always add a header like
He of course meant the From: MIME sender. This can fail in a SPF check if
identity aligment is set to strict.
Rewriting the From: heasder is one way to solve it, another way which preserves
the original message in full, is to encapsulate the original message ina new
message/rfc822 container whe
>>"Never use a browser for email."
I don't agree.
In fact, using a browser for email or atleast initial setup, is actually more
secure. This because SMTP/IMAP clients normally don't support 2FA, so you would
have to "hack" a solution to enable 2FA for email.
This can be made in 2 ways: Either,
>> why not just point them at a hosting service like google apps, and let
google keep things up to date?
Costs money, and also the problem is that gmail imposes heavy spam filters
and "reputation blocks" meaning smaller providers with low email volumes,
are put in the spam folder, even if they ne
Till: dovecot ; sebastian
Ämne: RE: SV: Looking for a guide to collect all e-mail from the ISP mail
server
> and also the problem is that gmail imposes heavy spam filters and
"reputation blocks"
> meaning smaller providers with low email volumes, are put in the spam
folder, even
>> Running an unmaintained mail server is a BAD thing.
Of course. You maintain it.
>>I think you are confusing gmail and google apps (or whatever it is called
now, seems to change all the time).
Google apps uses the same restrictions. What I recall, you can disable SPF
and DKIM checks for truste
2020 15:57
Till: dovecot mailing list
Ämne: Re: Looking for a guide to collect all e-mail from the ISP mail server
On 25 Oct 2020, at 22:47, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
> The second way, is to not have webmail at all, but instead have a
authentication gateway in browser, where you must auth with 2FA a
>>EU have very strict laws on the security of email and the requirement to
keep it archived and to ensure the data cannot get out.
No.
GDPR is very organization-specific, meaning that a small organization or
non-profit with 5 employees, don't need the same security as a 100 employee
multi-million
>>Whatever Gmail wants is essentially a defacto standard.
Gmail have solved it with a Oauth authorization scheme. Basically, first time
setting up mail, you are asked to authenticate by 2FA in a webview, then a
shared secret is established, that is used during SMTP and IMAP time.
Both Hotmail an
Problem is that not many client support it - especially mobile ones.So
wireguard VPN is the way to go, much simpler for the users.
Originalmeddelande Från: Rick Romero
Datum: 2021-07-15 17:04 (GMT+01:00) Till: dovecot@dovecot.org Ämne: Re: Sv:
2FA/MFA with IMAP & postfix/subm
-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xea) [0x7f57c57b4d0a] ->
dovecot/replicator(_start+0x2a) [0x55aabc671d6a]
And setting vsz_limit = 0 doesn't help either - it just tries to
allocate all available memory.
I'm running:
# 2.3.13 (89f716dc2): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.5.13 (cdd19fe3)
# OS: Linux 5.10.0-8-amd64 x86_64 Debian 11.0
--
Sebastian Podjasek
If yore gonna check for IP, you should do it in pre-login so you can reject the
username/password combo if the registred IP of account does not match.But guess
its better to write a custom login handler for that, that also checks user's ip
against database, in addition to username/password, and
Another solution is to use for example Ciphermail to automatically encrypt mail
server-side. In this way you don't need to reject non-encrypted mail, you can
just make sure it gets encrypted before it leaves premises.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För Austi
MUA/browser based things are not considered be in scope for GDPR unless they
are truly unique.
So you do NOT need to hide user-agent/MUA for privacy reasons.
Received lines is only applicable (in scope for GDPR) if they identify the end
user. A good solution to this would be to just scrap every
I would say, lock accounts to for example IP address, ASN or GeoIP.
This can be accomplished simply by a custom login handler, which also checks IP
against database.
And first time users, and those who change country/ISP/IP have to simply logon
to a web interface (where 2FA can be required and
I get it too. These appear because they don't replace either MAIL FROM: or Mime
From: with the list address. This causes validations to fail since the mailing
list is trying to spoof mail in your name, and of course, anti-spoofing
security is going to react. DKIM can be troublesome since mailing
doveadm processes remain, though.
Do you have any suggestions on how to resolve this?
[1] https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2022-January/123907.html
Best regards
Sebastian
# doveconf -n
# 2.3.18 (9dd8408c18): /usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0
Thats a TLD ban. Meaning *.ru is banned.
same applies for my domain for example, I ban *.xyz, *.date and a few others.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För Lev
Serebryakov
Skickat: den 12 februari 2022 12:08
Till: dovecot@dovecot.org
Ämne: Re: Sv: dovecot mail
l configured in Swedish, but Sweden &
Finland are not officially part of NATO, AFAIK, and Sweden has its own currency
whereas Finland did give up the markka in exchange for the Euro some 20-odd
years ago I don't recall.
On February 12, 2022 2:58:03 AM AKST, Sebastian Nielsen mailto:se
s should be returned to IMAP
client.
(The reason I want this, is because I have configured my outgoing SMTP
server to populate Sent, and some email clients doesn't have the option to
"Don't store a copy of the email in Sent folder" resulting in duplicates)
Best rega
the newly created email
is simply discarded. No error message or error codes should be returned
to IMAP client.
(The reason I want this, is because I have configured my outgoing SMTP
server to populate Sent, and some email clients doesn't have the option
to "Don't store a copy of
IMAP, it doesn't select emails written from
appendfile in exim4, which is good.
So now I somehow need to get exim4 to actually delete the email completely
and not just mark it for deletion.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Sebastian Nielsen
Skickat: den 9 maj 2020 19:33
Til
.@sebbe.eu)<3385185>: Debug:
Mailbox Trash: UID 1190: Opened mail because: full mail
Then in trash, its still unread.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För Mark
Constable
Skickat: den 10 maj 2020 03:48
Till: dovecot@dovecot.org
Ämne: Re: SV: Marking all em
I have tried with this sieve config:
imapsieve_mailbox1_name = Sent
imapsieve_mailbox1_causes = COPY APPEND
imapsieve_mailbox1_after = file:/etc/dovecot/sieve/sent.sieve
and this sieve file (sent.sieve):
discard;
This should clearly cause the mail to be deleted right?
But whats happen, i
e/Sieve/Plugins/IMAPSieve
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För Robert L
Mathews
Skickat: den 23 maj 2020 01:43
Till: dovecot@dovecot.org
Ämne: Re: What causes mails to get striked-over only, and not deleted?
On 5/22/20 4:01 PM, Sebastian Nielsen wrote:
> a
might be a victim of spoofed Gmail email.
Best regards, Sebastian Nielsen
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För Marc
Roos
Skickat: den 11 juni 2020 10:21
Till: dovecot ; users
Ämne: handling spam from gmail.
I am sick of this gmail spam. Does anyone k
Plaintext access is no problem if the connection is secured via other means -
for example internal network or VPN.
If the IMAP server cannot be accessed from the outside, and the traffic don't
travel over wifi or public networks, no danger.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...
ing gonna come out of the pipe.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För Alexander
Dalloz
Skickat: den 7 juli 2020 18:30
Till: dovecot@dovecot.org
Ämne: Re: SV: Outlook vs Thunderbird
Am 07.07.2020 um 18:11 schrieb Sebastian Nielsen:
> Plaintext access is no
>>Actually, there is a regedit "trick" for Win7 but that is beyond the ability
>>of our customers to apply, and that doesn't help the older Apple device users.
You could build a .reg file with the trick inside, and then distribute it to
your users. However it wont solve the Apple problem.
smi
Hello,
multiple times per day one of our Dovecot servers has the problem that it
suddenly refuses to accept new connections and then floods the logs with these
messages:
Dec 2 12:43:06 alfa3201 dovecot: pop3-login: Error: fd_send(pop3, 18) failed:
Too many references: cannot splice
Dec 2 12:
a patch there. I can confirm the patch is
> working for us.
I have applied that patch to the server and I will report back in a couple of
days if it is also working for us.
-- Sebastian
On 21/08/17 00:28, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
just setting a new Dovecot server to migrate from older system, but, I
have a general question:
1. I've set the server with self issued cert, and both pop/imap
StartTLS/110/143 SSL/993/995 (apologies if I'm using wrong naming
terminology)
is there a
On 21/08/17 10:37, Gedalya wrote:
On 08/21/2017 07:28 AM, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
is there a 'preferred way'? should I tell users to use 143 over 993 ? or
993 over 143? or?
There is no concrete answer. There are various opinions and feelings about this.
The opinion againt 993/995 is that the
On 21/08/17 13:39, Robert Wolf wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 21/08/17 10:37, Gedalya wrote:
On 08/21/2017 07:28 AM, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
is there a 'preferred way'? should I tell users to use 143 over 993 ? or
993 over 143? or?
There is no concr
On 21/08/17 16:25, Robert Wolf wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 21/08/17 13:39, Robert Wolf wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
On 21/08/17 10:37, Gedalya wrote:
On 08/21/2017 07:28 AM, voy...@sbt.net.au wrote:
is there a 'preferred way'?
On 21/08/17 22:18, Joseph Tam wrote:
Lest anyone think STARTTLS MITM doesn't happen,
https://threatpost.com/eff-calls-out-isps-modifying-starttls-encryption-commands/109325/3/
Not only for security, I prefer port 993/995 as it's just plain simpler
to initiate SSL from the get-go rather t
On 22/08/17 01:56, Peter wrote:
Lest anyone think STARTTLS MITM doesn't happen,
https://threatpost.com/eff-calls-out-isps-modifying-starttls-encryption-commands/109325/3/
Right, the attack does happen, but it can be prevented by properly
configuring the server and client.
Not only for securi
.
Sebastian
However, you SHOULD IMHO lock the access so it has to be manually opened for
each user that wants it. Another way is to do a PTR lookup on IP and [DROP] the
packet if its not a google IP.
And then have a IP restriction on IMAP and also 587/SMTP Auth.
This because there is bots out there that gue
my
setup please see my post from February [1].
@Arnaud: What OS are you running on?
Best
Sebastian
[1] https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2022-February/124168.html
On 4/24/22 19:36, Paul Kudla (SCOM.CA Internet Services Inc.) wrote:
>
> Question having similiar replication issues
&
Even more stupid that the IMAP port is available to the public. Should have
been firewalled to authorized IPs only, then it wouldn't have mattered that the
password have leaked.
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: dovecot-boun...@dovecot.org För Daniel Lange
Skickat: den 27 april 2022 14:59
couldn't figure out which one it could be. I also have no clue right now
how to debug this further.
Thank you very much for your help. If more information are needed, I
will of course be happy to provide them.
VG
Sebastian
Error logs =
May 16 13:33:43 Fatal: im
gram terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x7f8e0798617c in acl_mailbox_get_aclobj
(box=box@entry=0x560b7e510c08) at acl-mailbox.c:31
31 acl-mailbox.c: No such file or directory.
If this is not the information you need and you want me to do something
different
un (ioloop=0x5586bfbd9f10) at
ioloop.c:762
#13 0x7fcb4734e353 in master_service_run (service=0x5586bfbd9d60,
callback=callback@entry=0x5586bec3ef90 ) at
master-service.c:869
#14 0x5586bec21f0a in main (argc=, argv=out>) at main.c:564
On 16.05.22 16:08, Sebastian Kroczek wrote:
after i
so seem to have stopped.
On 16.05.22 17:14, Sebastian Kroczek wrote:
Here of course the missing backtrace:
#0 0x7fcb470e517c in acl_mailbox_get_aclobj
(box=box@entry=0x5586bfc958f8) at acl-mailbox.c:31
#1 0x7fcb470d06ed in imap_acl_cmd_myrights (cmd=0x5586bfc0cbe8,
mailbox=0x5586bfc2ae
ica to get
rid of one of the conflicting guids (one time, Dovecot replicated the
deletion despite removing the user from replication, so the backup came
in handy)
* alternatively, you might be fine by deleting the folder's index files
* add the user back to replication
* let dsync replicate the user
-> fixed
It's not a very convenient way to resolve this, but maybe it helps. Any
better solutions are greatly appreciated!
Best
Sebastian
are used:
https://www.iana.org/assignments/imap-metadata/imap-metadata.xhtml#imap-metadata-2
I would also be interested to know if and how that works, especially if
you can add a rule when moving mails (from anywhere) to a certain
mailbox for a single user.
Best,
Sebastian
On 17.10.2022 12
t looks like the script is never started.
Is this because I mis-configured the path? Or something else? It is in
the same folder as I store the other scripts, i.e., ~/sieve (the normal
sieve scripts work fine)
-Sebastian
re (file or syslog)
sieve or pigeonhole will be in there when you try to do something
fyi
fyi
Happy Thursday !!!
Thanks - paul
Paul Kudla
Scom.ca Internet Services <http://www.scom.ca>
004-1009 Byron Street South
Whitby, Ontario - Canada
L1N 4S3
Toronto 416.642.7266
Main 1.866.4
ept and I would like to use it, but obviously I do
not want to use a soon-to-be-deprecated feature in a completely new deployment.
So, does anybody know an alternative solution for attachment deduplication
(except file-system level deduplication)?
Thanks,
Sebastian
smime.p7s
Description:
# HG changeset patch
# User Sebastian Wiedenroth
# Date 1437050484 -7200
# Thu Jul 16 14:41:24 2015 +0200
# Node ID 7ef3a533b097e8e6590e754dc56ad308ab29233b
# Parent e3640ccaa76d77a9658126d1f8f306480dad8af7
Fix hang in safe_sendfile on SmartOS
The call to sendfile on SmartOS can fail with
Hello,
if you want to answer to this mail, please send it directly to me.
I have found a big issue with the following command "doveadm -search -A". It
whatsoever works by setting doveadm_worker_count = 0 in the dovecot.conf
configuration file.
The problem is that doveadm-server or something si
ping?
If more information or a system to test the issue on is required please let me
know, I’m sure I can provide those.
If this list is not the correct place for patches I’m also happy to learn where
else to send it.
Thanks.
Best regards,
Sebastian
> Am 16.07.2015 um 17:03 schr
> Am 07.09.2015 um 21:34 schrieb Timo Sirainen :
>
> On 07/16/2015 06:03 PM, Sebastian Wiedenroth wrote:
>> Fix hang in safe_sendfile on SmartOS
>>
>> The call to sendfile on SmartOS can fail with EOPNOTSUPP. This is a valid
>> error
>> code and docu
Dear all,
I am using Dovecot 2.2.19 and I keep on getting the following warnings in my
mail.log file on FreeBSD 10:
Oct 24 10:45:28 server1 dovecot: imap: Error: GC Warning: Repeated allocation
of very large block (appr. size 20480):
Oct 24 10:45:28 server1 dovecot: imap: Error: May lead to m
Hi Timo,
alright, thanks I will recompile without gc - this is a standard build option
on FreeBSD but I will get the port maintainer to maybe change this.
Best regards
Sebastian
> Am 24.10.2015 um 23:19 schrieb Timo Sirainen :
>
> On 24 Oct 2015, at 14:59, Sebastian Wolfgarten
trigger.
Is there any way to test if sieve is even executed when a mail arrives?
mail_debug did not give me any relevant information.
BTW: I checked my sieve script with the sieve-test command and it would
execute the right action (move a mail into a directory).
Bye
Sebastian
th_hardlinks: yes
mail_executable: /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/pop3
mail_plugin_dir: /usr/local/dovecot/lib/dovecot/pop3
pop3_enable_last: yes
pop3_uidl_format: %f
pop3_client_workarounds: outlook-no-nuls oe-ns-eoh
Any hint in the right direction is greatly appreciated
Regards,
Sebastian Faerber
> The main issue here is that qmail-pop3d violates POP3 spec and returns
> wrong message sizes. The size that should be reported to POP3 clients is
> the one with linefeeds counted as CR+LF pairs instead of plain LFs. This
> doesn't seem to break clients, but I don't want to violate specs just to
>
any).
Does version 1.1.x correct this errors ? And what is better to use : nfs or
memory indexing ?
Can someone point me adventages and disadventages of using both solutions?
Best regards,
Sebastian
Hi,
Thanks for reply.
2008/8/4 Timo Sirainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Aug 4, 2008, at 9:42 AM, Sebastian Tymków wrote:
>
> Hi,
>>
>> I wonder if it's normal behaviour that indexes created in memory have long
>> creation time.
>>
>
> No, but the
bexec/dovecot/imap-login
auth default:
mechanisms: plain digest-md5
debug: yes
passdb:
driver: pam
userdb:
driver: passwd
Please let me know in case there is any other information required
to nail down the culprit. Thanks.
Sebastian
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 01:14 +0100, Sebastian Kayser wrote:
>> =>[1] hash_lookup(table = (nil), key = 0x68f6), line 159 in "hash.c"
>> [2] child_process_lookup(pid = 26870), line 31 in "child-process.c"
>> [3] log_it(log_
Delivering
works well, I'm just not sure if everyone could revive the emails ?
Any tips ?
reagards, Sebastian
r: /var/opt/csw/run/dovecot/login
login_executable: /opt/csw/libexec/dovecot/imap-login
mail_location: mbox:~/:INBOX=/mail/%u
mmap_disable: yes
mail_nfs_storage: yes
mail_nfs_index: yes
mail_drop_priv_before_exec: yes
mail_executable: /usr/local/bin/dovecot-imap-wrapper.sh
auth default:
passdb:
driver: pam
userdb:
driver: passwd
Sebastian
ocation (passed via userdb)
[1] that might help in your situation. Furthermore you can get _very_
flexible in determining the mail location (or even doing a lot of other
things) by using a wrapper script to mail_executable [2].
Sebastian
[1] http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailLocation
[2] http://wiki.dovecot.org/PostLoginScripting
Hello ,
I am forced to use 2 DBs to auth users. First one is for our CRM system
(new user=mail from him/her) , second is for other (cannot user CRM DB :( )
Postfix have no problem to deliver mails to both DBs but I've some
problems with reciveing mails from second (not CRM) DB.
The dovecot.con
do (and that's what the Wiki says) is to configure a
separate key/certificate pair for each daemon. One for the imap daemon
and a different one for the pop3 daemon and only then you would need 4
files (2 * (key + certificate)).
Sebastian
not found" until
__both__ requests failed?
Regards
Sebastian
On 16.12.2010 15:25, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-12-16 8:55 AM, Javier de Miguel Rodríguez wrote:
El 16/12/10 14:50, Sebastian Urbanneck escribió:
Following:
We've got a Dovecot 1.0.10 running on Ubuntu Hardy. Till now we used
to have only mail accounts under our own domain, but
g clone() directly instead of
>pthreads?).
Perhaps libeio (http://software.schmorp.de/pkg/libeio.html) is a good
starting point?
I don't have any experience with it but it's used by node.js
(http://nodejs.org/) for the async I/O stuff.
-Sebastian
on. So I'm asking you for
help. Has someone a similar setup or a little idea how to make this work
with deliver.
Thanks in advance
Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
file:
No such file or directory
My dovecot install is in /usr/lib/dovecot and I had to symlink the libs
in the dovecot folder to /usr/lib to make managesieve work.
My configure options were: "--prefix=/usr --with-dovecot=/usr/lib/dovecot"
Sebastian
--
The best thing about a boole
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 02:02:13PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Does "ldd /usr/libexec/dovecot/managesieve-login" show that it finds
> libdovecot-login.so.0?
Without symlinks in /usr/lib/ ldd looks like this:
ldd /usr/lib/dovecot/managesieve-login
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb77b8000)
libdo
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 04:09:21PM +0100, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 16:29 +0200, Sebastian Köhler wrote:
> > For some reason managesieve-login ignores the libs it was compiled
> > against and only looks into /usr/lib for the libs.
>
> What is the linking co
isten
client:
path: /var/run/dovecot/auth-client
mode: 432
user: postfix
group: postfix
master:
path: /var/run/dovecot/auth-master
mode: 384
user: vmail
group: vmail
plugin:
quota: maildir:storage=10
Regards,
Sebastian
=
homeDirectory=home,uidNumber=uid,gidNumber=gid,mailMessageStore=mail,mai
lQuota=quota=maildir:storage
regards,
Sebastian
-Original Message-
From: Timo Sirainen [mailto:t...@iki.fi]
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 12:52 AM
To: Sebastian Logar
Cc: dovecot@dovecot.org
Subject: Re: [Dovecot
Upgrade and configuration changes did work.
Thank you Timo and thank you for nice work you are doing.
Regards,
Sebastian
I am trying to configure my Dovecot installation to provide
Vacation/Out-of-the-office emails using the Sieve plugin. My setup is a
little bit peculiar:
Internet Internet
| ^
V |
Pro
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
