Sorry to bump up an old thread.
2.3.11.3 already contains this patch and the error still gets
generated.
Anything else we could try ?
Scott
On Wednesday, 19/08/2020 at 11:37 Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 17:03:57 +0200, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after the upgrade
15:07:37 -0400, Scott Q. wrote:
> Sorry to bump up an old thread.
>
> 2.3.11.3 already contains this patch and the error still gets
> generated.
I'm not sure where you are finding it. The below patch isn't on the
release-2.3.11 branch. It isn't in the 2.3.11.3 tar
I've actually done a lot of debugging on this and it has to do
with very large headers in e-mails.
I've sent to Jeff the full GDB debug output and from what I gathered
myself, I can replicate the bug 100% of the time when I send a message
with 100 header lines of
x-locaweb-id:
TsKSlv8kr1xtXZssG
Not sure if I mentioned it but I'm on FreeBSD too. I wonder if any
of the patches FreeBSD applies automatically is causing this. I looked
through them but couldn't find anything obvious that might cause this
--- configure.orig 2020-08-12 12:20:51 UTC
+++ configure
@@ -28901,13 +28901,13 @@ fi
Here's a few tips:
1. I assume that's a 2U format -24 bays. You only have 1 raid card
for all 24 disks ? Granted you only have 16, but usually you should
assign 1 card per 8 drives. In our standard 2U chassis we have 3 hba's
per 8 drives. Your backplane should support that.
2. Add more drives
3. G
The 9361-8i does support passthrough ( JBOD mode ). Make sure you
have the latest firmware.
On Wednesday, 09/09/2020 at 03:55 Miloslav Hůla wrote:
Hi, thank you for your reply. I'll continue inline...
Dne 09.09.2020 v 3:15 John Stoffel napsal(a):
> Miloslav> Hello,
> Miloslav> I sent this into
some reason, but I hope there is no difference with
single drive.
Thank you
Milo
Dne 09.09.2020 v 15:51 Scott Q. napsal(a):
> The 9361-8i does support passthrough ( JBOD mode ). Make sure you
have
> the latest firmware.
Does anyone know if it's possible to do FTS Index based on a
userdb preference ? Basically if the preference is 'on' , dovecot goes
ahead with the fts indexing for that particular user.
I'm guessing right now it's not possible but is there anyone that
could envision writing such a patch ? If so, c
On Tuesday, 22/09/2020 at 02:33 Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 18.9.2020 17.45, Scott Q. wrote:
> Does anyone know if it's possible to do FTS Index based on a userdb
> preference ? Basically if the preference is 'on' , dovecot goes
ahead
> with the fts indexing for that particular use
anged in
a long time, so I really don't know what to think.
On Thursday, 15/10/2020 at 09:59 Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2020-09-07, Scott Q. wrote:
>
> Not sure if I mentioned it but I'm on FreeBSD too. I wonder if any
> of the patches FreeBSD applies automatically is causing
This reminds me, the way I was able to reproduce this consistently
was by having large headers ( 100+ lines ).
On Friday, 16/10/2020 at 11:49 Patrik Peng wrote:
On 19.08.20 17:37, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 17:03:57 +0200, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Hi, after the
There's no ambiguity here, if you send a message, you are the
sender. The envelope from should be yours.
On Sunday, 25/10/2020 at 11:48 Marc Roos wrote:
Say someone has setup spf for his domain and sends an email to a user
that has in roundcube enabled the sieve forward. If the message is
for
no spam/virus filtering ? Virtual suicide these days :P
On Monday, 26/10/2020 at 16:13 R. Diez wrote:
> Start of a HOWTO:
>
> 1) Install dovecot, create virtual accounts for all of your users
> 2) Install fetchmail, make it pull the ISPs IMAP and deliver locally
> 3) Install postfix as a smar
John Fawcett wrote:
On 21/10/2020 16:44, Patrik Peng wrote:
On 16.10.20 18:34, Patrik Peng wrote:
On 16.10.20 18:00, Scott Q. wrote:
This reminds me, the way I was able to reproduce this consistently
was by having large headers ( 100+ lines ).
On Friday, 16/10/2020 at 11:49 Patrik
m Apr 27 by
Stephan Bosch
https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/799b52accf71e86756dde738d22c1c6a500a7e29#diff-1c02b3481573ffd33c9abccd3f5a6752a5cd81ca83389f4380657f7309c06366
On Saturday, 31/10/2020 at 08:40 John Fawcett wrote:
On 31/10/2020 00:18, Scott Q. wrote:
I have implemented
You can write something similar and I think others did already if
you Google for it. Shouldn't take you more than 1-2h to write
something in Perl:connect to backend, no login, remove from director
On Saturday, 16/01/2021 at 22:37 Steven Varco wrote:
Hi Christian
This confused me as well.
I la
Is this the same bug that John created a patch for but then
Dovecot fixed differently in the latest version ?
The one with the assertion ? If so, I thought it was fixed, no ?
On Tuesday, 09/02/2021 at 17:32 Arjen Heidinga wrote:
On 08-02-2021 18:40, deano-dove...@areyes.com wrote:
>
> Do we
Hi Aki,
sorry for hijacking this thread, but when you do a SEARCH at least
there's an 'Indexing update' being returned from the server.
If the mailbox is not indexed and you do a SORT it just hangs with no
update whatsoever until it completes.
I think it would be beneficial to update the client
I'm stuck with using Qmail which has no LMTP support, and thus I'm
using dovecot-lda which has certain drawbacks.
Has anyone found a way to direct dovecot-lda to deliver the mail to
the LMTP server or any other way for Qmail to deliver the mail to the
LMTP server directly ?
Thanks!
I'm on Debian 12.5 which comes with openssl 3.0.11
I compiled Dovecot 2.3.21 with some pretty vanilla options:
/configure --prefix=/usr/local/dovecot --with-sql --with-mysql
--with-docs --with-ssl --without-shadow --without-pam --without-ldap
--without-pgsql --without-sqlite --with-systemd
systemu
Thank you - just this patch ? Because I installed it and I get
the same behavior unfortunately...
On Wednesday, 19/06/2024 at 04:37 Daniel Lange via dovecot wrote:
Hi Scott,
Am 19.06.24 um 06:41 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot:
>
>> On 19/06/2024 06:58 EEST Scott Q. via dovec
Thank you Aki.
do you know if I can compile it against openssl1.1.1w and also use
mysql which is compiled against openssl 3.0 ?
On Wednesday, 19/06/2024 at 00:41 Aki Tuomi wrote:
> On 19/06/2024 06:58 EEST Scott Q. via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> I'm on Debian 12.5 which c
Answering my own question. It works although it's not enough to
set compiler flags as per the docs to the custom openssl dir
I had to also add the library to ldconfig
Otherwise, it seems to work just fine.
Thank you all
On Wednesday, 19/06/2024 at 09:11 Scott Q. via dovecot wrote:
Than
You can switch to oauth2 and then each device will have a unique
client id that you can use to identify the culprit.
On Tuesday, 25/06/2024 at 07:29 Eirik Rye via dovecot wrote:
On 2024-06-25 12:00, hp--- via dovecot wrote:
> I am running Dovecot 2.3.21. One client has multiple computers in
the
For what it's worth, I installed openssl 1.1.1w in a custom dir,
compiled dovecot 2.3.21 against it and it works like a charm against
our test suite and production load.
On Tuesday, 25/06/2024 at 11:08 Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> On 25/06/2024 17:26 EEST Laura Smith via dovecot wrote:
>
>
Hi Laura,
I understand your frustration but if you are relying on Dovecot for a
commercial solution, I believe your anger is misguided. The open
source project has no duty nor do they have to guarantee anything.
Open source means everyone can contribute, but in this case, only one
major contributo
ge
my patch into the tree ... ergo it will never be on the Dovecot repo
... ergo I would have wasted my time.
On Wednesday, 26 June 2024 at 14:47, Scott Q. wrote:
Hi Laura,
I understand your frustration but if you are relying on Dovecot for a
commercial solution, I believe your anger is m
What's her point really ? That someone owes her up to date,
FREE, secure software that she wants to use in a commercial setting
?
This has been debated ad nauseum. Get your expectations in check.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38301710
On Wednesday, 26/06/2024 at 16:13 Simon B via dovecot
Here goes another oauth2 question, hoping it won't be ignored
like all the others.
I want to use get/auth on tokeninfo_url but post on introspection_url
but dovecot doesn't let me. It doesn't add the auth header on
tokeninfo_url whenever introspection_mode == post
so, if introspection_mode = post
4wvz8RBFc5f0ey-M8dLM00eq5h1EuUP02NUbaYzsfLkhejfBzMALGdQAvrEbrQ53RBcuiehVYNsOZ94ge9nhMLeNmMMRNpqYiUePLMYz-lmRqdFLKcx5OlvA3VM5pLctWsoHW7Gm0awckBzdw
Thanks,
Scott
On Monday, 01/07/2024 at 12:38 Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> On 01/07/2024 19:29 EEST Scott Q. via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> Here goes another oauth2 question, hoping it won&#
://keycloak.dev1:8443/realms/myrealm/protocol/openid-connect/userinfo
Aki
> On 01/07/2024 19:49 EEST Scott Q. via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> I'm on 2.3.21
>
> setting introspection_mode to auth causes tokeninfo url to have the
> token in both querystring & header.
>
> I&#x
e slightly wrong before, we made it work more standard in
2.3.21
They were sent as URL parameters before, but it was changed into basic
auth instead.
Aki
> On 01/07/2024 20:06 EEST Scott Q. via dovecot wrote:
>
>
> Ok, thanks, what also works is leaving tokeninfo_url em
We are having an issue with our namespace configuration, as per
the eM Client folks. We present the following namespaces via IMAP,
with Dovecot as backend. This is the actual imap conversation
08:37:10.896|03E| 01: A4 ID ("name" "eM Client" "version"
"10.1.4393.0" "GUID" "EMCLIENT_V1" "vendor" "
"Outlook Mobile temporarily stores and indexes user data (including
email, attachments, calendar information, and contacts), along with
login credentials,[25] [1] in a "secure" form on Microsoft Azure
[2] servers located in the United States.[26] [3] On Exchange
accounts, these servers identify as
I see this thread is getting quite personal, but if I may comment
on something you wrote.
>> I more or less said that, you are a mail administrator yes? then
you know bloody damn well that 99% of spam checks are carried out
after reception of the mail
depends what you define by reception. We per
Data centres in the EU is not enough to ensure data stays local.
https://www.edps.europa.eu/press-publications/press-news/press-releases/2024/european-commissions-use-microsoft-365-infringes-data-protection-law-eu-institutions-and-bodies_en
As far as I know, the EU is pushing hard f
Not everyone. The EU is pushing hard for data to stay local.
MS/Google will do what they know best: offer 0 support even to paying
customers and jack up the prices once the competition dries up.
There will always be alternatives.
Scott
On Monday, 18/11/2024 at 06:52 Marc via dovec
In all fairness here, Gmail/Outlook play by their own rules and
people just accept them because it's free.
Try sending a spam message that Gmail sends you, back to them and see
what happens.
Yeah.
On Tuesday, 26/11/2024 at 05:14 Marc via dovecot wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Your system reporting fa
Replace SA by rspamd ? SA is unbearably slow. You have 14 mx
hosts, get 14 rspamd vhosts and I doubt you'll have any issues.
Scott
On Friday, 29/11/2024 at 22:07 Laura Steynes via dovecot wrote:
Hi Scott,
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 2:10 AM Scott Q. wrote:
> I see this thread is getti
Have you guys tried using XAPPLEPUSHSERVICE ?
I have that enabled and it doesn't even use IDLE.
Scott
On Tuesday, 07/01/2025 at 08:52 dovecot--- via dovecot wrote:
I think there are/were multiple issues, which confuses diagnosis. As a
workaround I had disabled imap-IDLE on my (Dovecot) mail
So what seems the be the consensus on what the issue is ?
What does the Stalwart patch do exactly - do you have a link for it ?
Scott
On Sunday, 05/01/2025 at 17:13 David Ferrero via dovecot wrote:
If you connect to imap with netcat assuming telnet isn’t an option
it will tell you what your
Anyone that knows a bit about the dovecot internals.
is move in any way faster than copy / set deleted flag / expunge ?
Thanks!
Scott
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
You can also enable Application Passwords in Gmail and use those
via classic auth.
Also allow user to enable less secure apps, enable less secure apps as
the user, then add the app passwords.
Scott
On Thursday, 21/11/2024 at 08:07 Jan Naumann via dovecot wrote:
On 20.11.24 23:49, Joseph Tam
What exactly stopped(will stop) working ? Generating through MacOS
Server which nobody should have been using anyways, or
the https://identity.apple.com/pushcert/caservice/new endpoint ?
Scott
On Wednesday, 08/01/2025 at 13:39 Michael Slusarz via dovecot wrote:
> On 01/08/2025 11:06 AM MST L
44 matches
Mail list logo
