> > > breaking the mail index
> >
> > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize mailbox
> renaming
> > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate indices)?
> >
>
> Dovecot is, if you use LAYOUT=index. This will use only mailbox GUID on
> disk, and the folder name i
> >
> >
> > > > > breaking the mail index
> > > >
> > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize mailbox
> > > renaming
> > > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate
> indices)?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Dovecot is, if you use LAYOUT=index. This will use only mail
> > > >
> > > > > > > breaking the mail index
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tangentially query: is Dveocot smart enough to optimize
> mailbox
> > > > > renaming
> > > > > > to do index renaming (i.e. does not try to copy or recreate
> > > indices)?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Dovecot is, if you use
> >
> > doveadm sync -u testacc
> 'mdbox:/home/testing/testacc/mdbox:INDEX=/home/testing/testacc/index:CONT
> ROL=/home/testing/testacc/mail/control:LAYOUT=index'
> >
> > Which gives me the expectec result. But I have also an archive
> namespace and an alt namespace that is going to be quite a lot
>
> This is ... bug like.
>
> The user moves a folder inside another, the resulting path exceeds the
> maximum length, the folder's content is no longer accessible, the user
> complains.
I don't think this is a bad idea. If this is really the issue.
> Double trouble. The user proceeded to mov
maybe list rocky and centos9 stream on the repo page?
https://repo.dovecot.org/
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
>
> Guys, any help?
this lacks context.
> Also, what would happen if the new server has a different hostname ?
So put temporary haproxy infront of it?
> Il giorno dom 10 mar 2024 alle ore 14:28 Gandalf Corvotempesta
> ha scritto:
> >
> > Hi guys
> > I have to migrate around 10k mailboxes fro
>
>
>
> • Gandalf Corvotempesta via dovecot [2024-04-10 21:07]:
> > Guys, any help?
>
> What you describe is exactly what I have been doing since ... forever
>
Why? The whole idea about having a LTS distribution is that you almost never
need to do this? It is not like the imap/pop/smtp s
> Hello. Using Mochahost and want to delete mailbox items older than 1
> month (approx) from receipt . Reading DoveCot documentation, not finding
> age query. Can you please specify this for me and provide an example?
>
doveadm move -u $account Archive/$year mailbox "$mbox" SENTBEFORE $nyear-01
>
> John Stoffel via dovecot skrev den 2024-04-16 14:51:
>
> > In general, usernames should NOT be case sensitive, that way leads
> > madness.
>
Linux user names are case sensitive. I tend not to argue with basis unix/linux
implementations, those are mostly well thought through by experts. T
>
> > Linux user names are case sensitive. I tend not to argue with basis
> > unix/linux implementations, those are mostly well thought through by
> > experts. This is from before the time that 'idiot' companies started
> > using email addresses for logins, so it is easier (to track users
> > acro
>
> No they aren't. The *host part* is case insensitive because the DNS is,
Indeed. Letsencrypt is utilizing this characteristic, they query the same
hostname every time with different randomized(?) capitalizations. I have no
idea what the logics behind this is.
Preventing this from showing in
> > I am upgrading to postfix 3.9.0. I have not used DKIM in previous
> postfix installs, but I would like to start now with the new google
> rules. I have done some research and opendkim is the most recommended,
> however, other research states the opendkim has been abandoned by it's
> maintainers
I can remember looking at rspamd years ago. I thought it was a bit chaotic with
all these rules. I can even remember asking developers some design questions
which they could not answer. The fact that they generate their own graphs
(still?) is also old fashioned. This Sergey that is working on ma
>
> Sure it's my own fault - no discussion about that, but seriously? How
> dangerously unintuitive it that?
>
I don't really get what is going on with remote host. How is a host name even
relevant other than setting up the initial connection. I don't even see it in
my storage mail files.
_
> Looking for some advise.
Hmmm, I am glad I took the time to arrange a proper ldap infrastructure. What
ever gets hammered stays local
>
> What I'm hoping is that dovecot has some way to in case of such
> "authentication backend" problem scenarios to ignore protocol and
> politeness and simply
>
> auth_failure_delay = 2 secs ?
>
> That will still simply wait before *rejecting* the login, compared to
> *dropping the connection*.
>
> We are thus looking for three different behaviours:
>
> 1. If backend confrims auth, ACK auth + proceed (grant access) to email.
>
> 2. If backen
I see report-ham, instead of archiving? I am not entirely sure if this is an
efficient approach to archiving. My users can only set a flag for 'auto
archiving' via sieve and then 3 months after every year messages are being
moved by cron jobs, and modification logs are put into their accounts. T
> On 2024-05-09 12:03, Marc wrote:
> > I see report-ham, instead of archiving? I am not entirely sure if this
> > is an efficient approach to archiving. My users can only set a flag for
> > 'auto archiving' via sieve and then 3 months after every year messages
> > are being moved by cron jobs, and
> Today I realized that it was indeed the sa-learn that is slowing down my
> Archiving.
>
> I added an «&» on the end of the line that calls the sa-learn (called by
> the report-ham.sieve script):
>
> exec /usr/bin/sa-learn -u ${1} --ham &
>
> Does anyone thing this is a bad idea? I noticed tha
> Am 19.05.2024 um 16:49 schrieb Richard Rosner via dovecot:
> > It most certainly isn't. nginx isn't running as root, yet it can log
> > without execution permissions just fine. Absolutely nothing should have
> > execution permissions if they aren't meant to be executed, which should
> > only be t
> I thought it was just a lack of skill on my part in finding/making the
> correct configuration.
I am curious about your results, so keep posting! :)
> But what do large email servers that use Dovecot do?
>
> I thought it was an orchestration between OpenLDAP, Postfix and Dovecot
> because
>
> Lots of the emails I send aren't stored in the sent folder. It seems
> that it mostly (but not always) work for sent emails where the main
> email-address (the one that is also used as login name) is used as
> sender. It never seems to work when an alias is used as sender name.
>
> I didn't
>
> I definitely don't know if it's a dovecot issue, but I thinks it's a good
> place to start looking, since dovecot is managing the mailboxes. Can I
> increase the verbosity in a way that saving an email into a folder would
> be logged?
Maybe reindex the mailbox and see if the messages turn up?
Maybe easier to make these users linux users/posix accounts and then
authenticate against linux. With nslcd and sssd you also have some caching you
can benefit from. I am not even sure if this is related to dovecot or your
postfix.
>
> I am trying to setup AD auth with dovecot and have tried
I am a bit rookie with sieve. Some time ago I created a sieve pipe that would
sometimes alter alter the subject and move a message to a different mailbox.
Currently this results in that a date changes of this message while I don't see
anything in the source altering a date.
What could be causi
> > I am a bit rookie with sieve. Some time ago I created a sieve pipe that
> would sometimes alter alter the subject and move a message to a different
> mailbox. Currently this results in that a date changes of this message
> while I don't see anything in the source altering a date.
> >
> > What c
How to get dovecot use the from in sieve in the envelope?
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
>
> How to get dovecot use the from in sieve in the envelope?
>
>
obviously this is set:
sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient = yes
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
>
> >
> > How to get dovecot use the from in sieve in the envelope?
> >
> >
>
> obviously this is set:
> sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient = yes
At first I thought maybe it was some spf/dmarc related setting. But this script
is sending out the test message. I need the vacation to use/add the -
>
> >
> > >
> > > How to get dovecot use the from in sieve in the envelope?
> > >
> > >
> >
> > obviously this is set:
> > sieve_vacation_send_from_recipient = yes
>
> At first I thought maybe it was some spf/dmarc related setting. But this
> script is sending out the test message. I need the vac
>
> I am getting the following error when Postfix attempts LMTP delivery :
>
> "lmtp(REDACTED)<32674><7Jm0BSVopmaifwAAbW4UVQ>: Fatal:
> setresgid(121(mailbox_user),121(mailbox_user),8(mail)) failed with
> euid=111(mailbox_user): Operation not permitted"
>
> mailbox_user is uid 111, gid 121 on
>
> we are releasing a CVE patch release 2.3.21.1.
>
> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.21.1.tar.gz
> https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.21.1.tar.gz.sig
> Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/
> Docker images in https://hub.docker.com/r/dovecot/dovecot
I know about t
>
> Vulnerability Details:
> Having a large number of address headers (From, To, Cc, Bcc, etc.)
> becomes excessively CPU intensive. With 100k header lines CPU usage is
> already 12 seconds, and in a production environment we observed 500k
> header lines taking 18 minutes to parse. Since this can
start to worry when it is quattuordecillions
>
> I just filled up my whole /var with zillions of files
> /var/spool/smtpd/offline , dating back to 2018. What are these files
> and is it safe for me to delete the ones more than a week old?
>
___
dov
> On 14/08/24 23:25, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > we are releasing a CVE patch release 2.3.21.1.
> >
> > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.21.1.tar.gz
> > https://dovecot.org/releases/2.3/dovecot-2.3.21.1.tar.gz.sig
> > Binary packages in https://repo.dovecot.org/
> >
> >> Tests failing when attempting to build for both EL8 and 9:
> >
> > When is 2.4 for el9 expected?
>
> GhettoForge will release it after the general availablility of 2.4.
> Others from Dovecot have stated that it will be available directly from
> the dovecot ce repos once 2.4 is released.
>
B
I am adding a namespace with LAYOUT=index to an existing configuration, and get
this notification:
LAYOUT=index requires mailbox_list_index=yes
Maybe better to just not risk it and add LAYOUT=fs to my existing
mail_location=mdbox: lines?
___
dovec
I don't have an ALT specified in the mail location of the shared namespace.
Also when I add there ALT= I keep getting these checks. Also creating empty
file there creates this error.
Error: t_readlink(//mdbox/dbox-alt-root) failed: readlink()
I don't really like the idea of creating a s
I am getting this error. This file does not exist.
Error: t_readlink(/xx/dbox-alt-root) failed: readlink() failed: Permission
denied
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
> I am new to dovecot and have just done my first install, but, looking at
> your output, you are using Local Delivery rather than LMTP? If so, isn't
> the local delivery MTA (postfix, exim or whatever) responsible for
> dropping the mail into the correct location?
postfix does not know some mail
Is it possible to disable emitting the sieve header?
X-Sieve: Pigeonhole Sieve
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
> - NOT expunging the emails that have been marked as deleted on the slave
> server or expunging only manually
Yes I think it is depending on your storage format (mdbox only?). I am running
"doveadm purge -u" every two months. If I would make a new server I would also
use the LAYOUT=index this
> First of all, I'm not a dovecot user yet.
> For several years now I use cyrus imapd and never saw the urge to
> switch, until I recently lost random mails from my mailbox which were
> neither temporally connected nor related in some other way.
>
What do you mean lost? And how do you know it is
> I am pretty new to Dovecot and totally new to LMTP. I have normal
> delivery working but I am struggling with aliases. In my mail queue I am
> seeing things like:
>
> But in my /etc/aliases, I am aliasing clamav to nick and
> n...@mydomain.com is a valid mail box that can receive normal mail.
>
> Mail already in the queue will need to be reprocessed with
> postsuper -r ALL
>
> Or just delete it and test again.
>
his problem is low uid number
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovec
I am creating the mailbox like this:
doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest shared/sharedtest1
I can set acl's (I think), at least the acl get produces the same.
doveadm acl set -u usertest shared/sharedtest1 user=usertest6 lookup read write
write-seen insert post
doveadm a
this seems to show
doveadm mailbox list -u usertest6
Trash
Sent
NotSpam
Drafts
Junk
Shared
UserShares
UserShares/usertest
UserShares/usertest/sharedtest3
UserShares/usertest/sharedtest1
UserShares/usertest/sharedtest2
INBOX
But thunderbird / roundcube show nothing. Any idea's why?
_
>
>
> On 23-09-2024 10:30, Marc via dovecot wrote:
> > this seems to show
> > doveadm mailbox list -u usertest6
> >
> > Trash
> > Sent
> > NotSpam
> > Drafts
> > Junk
> > Shared
> > UserShares
> > UserShares/usert
also bug/no acl support in accessing index
dovecot[28746]: imap(usertest6)<29630>: Error:
fchown(/shared/usertest/index/mailboxes.lockcfcdcd07648b68e0,
group=10001(usertest)) failed: Operation not permitted (egid=10006, group based
on /shared/usertest/mdbox - see http://wiki2.dovecot.or
>
> I am creating the mailbox like this:
>
> doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest
> shared/sharedtest1
>
> I can set acl's (I think), at least the acl get produces the same.
>
> doveadm acl set -u usertest shared/sharedtest1 user=usertest6 lookup read
> write write-seen ins
>
> It doesn't look as if IMAP is supported ?
> ___
Maybe try again later after a good night rest?
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
I am cleaning a bit my sieve scripts and wondered if I should stick to this
solution
sieve_before =
sieve_before2 =
sieve_before3 =
or just one
sieve_before =
and put all scripts in this one. What are the advantages / disadvantages of
doing this?
__
>
> I have some issues testing public mailboxes with linux users and groups
>
> creating mailboxes for users for the first group is not really a problem:
>
> doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest
> public/publictest1
> doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest
doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest public/publictest1
public/mdbox/mailboxes) failed: Operation not permitted
[@public]# getfacl mdbox/
# file: mdbox/
# owner: root
# group: root
user::rwx
group::rwx
group:testgroup2:rwx
group:testgroup3:rwx
mask::rwx
other::---
_
I have some issues testing public mailboxes with linux users and groups
creating mailboxes for users for the first group is not really a problem:
doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest public/publictest1
doveadm -o mail_gid=testgroup2 mailbox create -u usertest6 public/publicte
I was wondering if it is possible to execute some trigger after a mailbox is
being shared so the user is automatically subscribed to it?
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dovecot-le...@dovecot.org
I am testing with sharing folders and constantly changing namespaces configs.
But quite regulary I am seeing these mailboxes popup
foldertest17270834637853 with sub mailbox foldertest
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send a
I am not sure if this page is correct, looks at least like this g+s not ok
https://doc.dovecot.org/2.3/admin_manual/filesystem_permission/
work-around is to manually create dirs mdbox mdbox/storage mdbox/mailboxes. I
would think this is a bug as files seem to be created correctly.
group rights a
It was related to some memory allocation in go. When I increased the memory in
lmtp. This problem was solved. Others started to notice this after some
specific version update of go.
>
>
> Op 19-9-2024 om 22:46 schreef Marc via dovecot:
> > I am trying to modify the body of
I have made some temporary fix with a cron job that checks this every 5 min and
auto subscribes mailboxes when a user is added to the acl. But I am still
looking for something better.
>
>
> I was wondering if it is possible to execute some trigger after a mailbox
> is being shared so the u
How is it possible that you have problems compiling a srpm? You must have
changed something. What is even this el6? ;) If you want run dovecot on older
el6 maybe try via docker?
> I encountered the following issue while compiling Dovecot on a Linux
> system with the Shenwei architecture in Chin
>
> > I think a good work around would be using LAYOUT=INDEX then you get
> > folder names like this and you 'probably' do not have such conflicts.
> > I think this layout is also better for when people start using
> > 'weird' characters or long names. Bad thing is, you need to convert
> > everyth
>
> Example: Customer has a Folder named: ARCHIV.AdministrationXXX
>
> Folder file exists and permissions look right:
> ./ARCHIV/AdministrationXXX
>
> d delete ARCHIV.AdministrationXXX
> d OK Delete completed (0.001 + 0.000 secs).
>
> Folder file is still present and can not be deleted again.
>
I am trying to modify the body of message with a global sieve script. It looks
like that sieve-test does not generate this error, however I am not really able
to verify the output. There does not seem to be an option to catch the output
(new message)
trace log
0008:3: finishing match
sieve-test(1164123): Fatal: Couldn't drop privileges: User is missing UID (see
mail_uid setting)
I don't get what this is about. Users are not missing an UID and how is it
related with testing sieve scripts?
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.
> Amelia Marie via dovecot skrev den 2024-09-20 08:44:
> > Free ecards from Sendwishonline.com are designed to create memorable
> > and engaging experiences. Many cards feature interactive elements, such
> > as animations and music, that enhance the recipient's experience. This
> > level of creativ
Hi Christian, nice you got this. I could have given you this also, but I have
this weird tree in the mail client, so I thought better not share it. I prefer
to see only 1 'Archive'
>
> I found the Solution myself. The key was to simply create an unnamed
> mailbox directive so that the namesp
What could this be, I am not even having an exit code 2 in my sieve plugin. If
I cat a message via cli I am getting exit code 0.
ps where are stderr messages logged of the plugin?
___
dovecot mailing list -- dovecot@dovecot.org
To unsubscribe send an em
>
> What could this be, I am not even having an exit code 2 in my sieve
> plugin. If I cat a message via cli I am getting exit code 0.
>
> ps where are stderr messages logged of the plugin?
>
script is ok
Debug: sieve: Finished running script (status=ok, resource usage: no usage
recorded)
__
I don't think you can use outlook mobile clients any more with own solutions. I
was trying this a few years ago and noticed all kinds of weird things not
working. I think it even sends your user+password to the microsoft cloud and
the ms cloud is handling your mail on the background.
Can't reall
> > Incorrect Sent means the receiving server has correctly received the
> > transmitted message. It has nothing to do with spam or not spam.
> >
> >
> I more or less said that, you are a mail administrator yes? then you
> know
> bloody damn well that 99% of spam checks are carried out after recept
>
> >> I more or less said that, you are a mail administrator yes? then
> you know bloody damn well that 99% of spam checks are carried out
> after reception of the mail
>
> depends what you define by reception. We perform spam checks on the
> DATA portion of the mail reception and can refuse a
>
> > Microsft outlook and Google Gmail hosts most spammers on the Planet
> > Earth.
>
> Nah, the worst offenders are OVH and Contabo, followed by digital sewer,
> then gmail :)
>
If you make spf -all for gmail that helps a lot. However there are still quite
a few 'my family member is so good
>
> Not everyone. The EU is pushing hard for data to stay local. MS/Google
> will do what they know best: offer 0 support even to paying customers
> and jack up the prices once the competition dries up.
>
You have already MS / Google data centres in the EU. And Apple is using
European registere
>
> Nick Howitt via dovecot skrev den 2024-11-18 13:00:
> > For me, I don't want big tech monitoring my emails.
>
> security starts with smime imho
Yes true, and it is more likely such things will be offered first by the bigger
cloud providers
___
d
nment that is quite appealing
to users.
>
> For me, I don't want big tech monitoring my emails.
>
>
> On 18/11/2024 11:52, Marc via dovecot wrote:
> > Sorry for being off topic, but why are you deciding to move to
> dovecot? I have the impression the trend is that
Sorry for being off topic, but why are you deciding to move to dovecot? I have
the impression the trend is that everyone is moving to google/outlook?
>
> I try to migrate a GMail mailbox to Dovecot using `doveadm backup -R
> imapc:`. Since it seems that GMail disabled the login without XOAUTH2,
I am testing a bit with sso with keycloak, I was wondering if/how it is
possible that your logged in session between eg Thunderbird and dovecot can be
used as a single sign on in webapplications. So as long as you have an active
session with dovecot you can access all your web applications witho
> >
> > Your provider is using this to estimate if a party is spam and block
> > your email. I prefer a system where you actually block someone for
> > having send spam. Since I am not sending newsletters or so and this
> > infrastructure I use is low volume, nothing outgoing is detected as
> > spa
> In all fairness here, Gmail/Outlook play by their own rules and people
> just accept them because it's free.
>
> Try sending a spam message that Gmail sends you, back to them and see
> what happens.
>
It is even worse, they just accept emails with stat=Sent and then delete emails
without noti
>
> >
> > >
> > > Try sending a spam message that Gmail sends you, back to them and
> see
> > > what happens.
> > >
> >
> > It is even worse, they just accept emails with stat=Sent and then
> delete
> > emails without notifications. I am currently trying to get the EU to
> take
> > such behaviour
I worked around this bug, having to append the url
otocol/openid-connect/token/?token=eyJhbGciOiJSUzI1NiIsInR5c
But having this
Got 405 response for request [Req1: GET https:/
Method Not Allowed (took 16 ms + 41 ms in queue)
Change to POST?
> I am getting first
>
> Using 1 idle connections to
> Does anyone have a current config example using openid and with
> roundcube. I like to add this next to 'regular' logins'. I was able to
> login once but know I am getting these in the logs
>
> " No requests to service for this peer (1 connections exist, 0 pending)"
>
>
> I have added the 2 pa
Does anyone have a current config example using openid and with roundcube. I
like to add this next to 'regular' logins'. I was able to login once but know I
am getting these in the logs
" No requests to service for this peer (1 connections exist, 0 pending)"
I have added the 2 passdb with link
I am getting first
Using 1 idle connections to handle 1 requests (1 total connections ready)
Claimed request [Req2: GET https:
No more requests to service for this peer (1 connections exist, 0 pending)
and then the 404
Got 404 response for request [Req2: GET https:/
This should work with 2.3.16
>
> > But now you are like ms/google/letsencrypt. We decide how you should
> > setup your servers, we decide how you setup your dns, we decide you
> are
> > not allowed to block the amazon cloud etc.
>
> WTF drugs are you on, my organisation my rules.
>
What education did you acquire? With your
> > >
> >
> > Your system reporting false positives, that is what I am trying to
> tell
> > you!
> >
> >
> Maybe that is in your opinion because you can not send him direct mail?
> Why
No, it is not an opinion it is a fact. That is the huge difference here. There
is some sort of logic in my reaso
I can remember looking at rspamd years ago. To me it looks like a choas of
applied rules. I can remember asking these devs some questions about rule
processing order, and they could not even answer them.
Do they still make own graphs? That already tells you their whole approach is
old-fashione
> I'm trying to follow the instruction
> https://doc.dovecot.org/2.3/configuration_manual/howto/antispam_with_sie
> ve/ to setup IMAPSieve
>
> I cannot find any info on what sieve_pipe_bin_dir should point to. Any
> references I have found to this point to the old wiki.
>
> My current spam learni
>
>
> Probably not as you only restarted. The limit is when you have create a
> new
> > connection and don't use an existing one.
>
> I don't see a way to reuse an existing connection yet if the number of
> persistent connections after a restart should increase from 0 to 40K
> I miss something o
> >
> > Long ago in MagicMail we recognized that there was a problem with
> > Postgres direct back addressing a large number of AUTH attempts at
> once,
> > and we went down the road to using a high performace DBFILE
> mechanisms,
> > with real time updates from the Postgres database.. allowed us t
>
> Do you mean that the contents of this file are not cached? or that there
> is
> some limit on the number of simultaneous requests to read it?
> content of this file not look too heavy
>
> > psql -c "UPDATE core_user SET last_login=now() WHERE username='$USER'"
> >
> > /dev/null
I would put a
> No, we don't have the noticeable iowait problem as I see it(at least
> until
> the number of connections lower 20-30K). The problem appears when
> thousands
> of clients try to reconnect at the same time and according to the
> documentation the auth service should make a simple request to postgre
> # Project
>
> https://github.com/croessner/nauthilus
>
> # Sub projects
>
> https://github.com/croessner/nauthilus-demo
> https://github.com/croessner/nauthilus-keycloak
> https://github.com/croessner/pfxhttp
> https://github.com/croessner/geoip-policyd
>
First when I read this, how is this
>
> Dovecot aligns the password encryption scheme used by the imap client
> with the password storage scheme used by the server.
>
> Since the default is set to plain text, the client sends the password in
> plain text (tls tunneled), and the server local storage of passwords is
> a plain text fi
>
> This is not the point, however.
>
> The point is that the default is not GDPR compliant, and a first easy
> alternative is also not GDPR compliant, and decoupling the user scheme
> from the server storage scheme is not at all obvious. Adopting a GDPR-
> compliant default would send out the in
Your argument is "that a default install is not compliant" and therefore you
ask people to change things. I am proving your argument is incorrect, so the
basis of your change request is gone.
> > A default dovecot (el9 rpm) install is compliant as it does not work
> and does not do anything, i
>
> > Therefore, Dovecot's plain text default, and the md5 option, are both
> non-GDPR compliant.
> >
> > To avoid monetary sanctions, Dovecot ought to change how it stores
> passwords by default.
> >
> > Please do not ignore this message.
>
> GDPR is some piece of bull*it regulation made by th
I was think of adding a mailinglist for a few users. First I thought about
maybe using separate container for this, but maybe I can just also add this to
the server running dovecot.
Anyone having experience with running mailman or something else next to dovecot?
__
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
