Hi, everyone!
I have seemingly correct settings for details to work: when I send a message to
user+det...@mydomain.tld, it goes into the "detail" folder of u...@mydomain.tld.
Also I have working aliases, so when I send a message to al...@mydomain.tld, it
goes into the INBOX folder of u...@mydom
Hi, Anton!
> Hi Denis,
>
>
> > I expected that when I send a message to alias+det...@mydomain.tld,
> > it would go into the "detail" folder of u...@mydomain.tld. However,
> > it goes into the INBOX folder of u...@mydomain.tld.
> >
> > Is it the intended behavior?
>
> It is.
>
> To achieve t
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 18:13:13 +0300
wrote:
> If I understand this correctly, this is needed so that the messages
> sent to alias+det...@mydomain.tld had "Delivered-To" header not with
> value of "u...@mydomain.tld" but with value of
> "user+det...@mydomain.tld". Am I right?
>
> So I have put into
So, there is now way that Dovecot can create folders with "detail" name for
mail sent to "alias+detail" address?
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 18:38:45 +0300
wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 18:13:13 +0300
> wrote:
>
> > If I understand this correctly, this is needed so that the messages
> > sent to alias+
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:08:28 +
Darac Marjal wrote:
> What I use is:
>
> if envelope :detail :regex "to" "(.+)" {
> set :upperfirst :lower "detail" "${1}";
> fileinto :create "Tagged/${detail}";
> stop;
> }
>
> Which says "if the envelope detail is not empty, copy it to a var
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:44:30 -0500
Daryl Richards wrote:
> On 2021-02-18 7:19 a.m., m...@shadrinden.ru wrote:
> > So, there is now way that Dovecot can create folders with "detail"
> > name for mail sent to "alias+detail" address?
> Have you checked the dovecot settings for lmtp_save_to_detail_
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:27:34 +0100
Bjoern Franke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > So, there is now way that Dovecot can create folders with "detail"
> > name for mail sent to "alias+detail" address?
>
> did you take a look into the logs? E.g. in my setup, dovecot complains
> when sieve should put the messag
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 13:08:28 +
Darac Marjal wrote:
> What I use is:
>
> if envelope :detail :regex "to" "(.+)" {
> set :upperfirst :lower "detail" "${1}";
> fileinto :create "Tagged/${detail}";
> stop;
> }
>
> Which says "if the envelope detail is not empty, copy it to a var
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:36:01 -0500
Daryl Richards wrote:
> Just to ask - when you say 'alias' do you mean something is
> re-writing the address based on some rule? If so, it sounds to me
> like that is dropping the +detail...
I mean the aliases defined in /etc/aliases, like
jane: joe
--
Re
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:57:19 -0500
Daryl Richards wrote:
> Do you have propagate_unmatched_extensions turned on?
>
> http://www.postfix.org/aliases.5.html shows that has to be on
> otherwise it could drop the +detail part...
On my machine it is by default set to
propagate_unmatched_extension
Hi, everyone!
I'm trying to get the detail part of the address (i.e. anything that comes
between + and @ in the address of this type: alias+det...@mydomain.tld) in this
sieve:
if address :regex :localpart "to" "\+(.*)" {
fileinto :create "${1}";
stop;
}
However, when I try to compile it wi
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:46:49 +0200 (EET)
Aki Tuomi wrote:
> > On 19/02/2021 07:54 m...@shadrinden.ru wrote:
> >
> > if address :regex :localpart "to" "\+(.*)" {
> > fileinto :create "${1}";
> > stop;
> > }
> >
> > error: invalid regular expression '+(.*)' for regex match: invalid
> > pre
Hi, everyone!
I have a sieve that is supposed to put all messages addressed to this mailing
list into a separate folder:
if anyof (address :is "to" "m...@shadrinden.ru",
address :is "to" "dovecot@dovecot.org") {
fileinto "mail_list";
stop;
}
Generally, it's working, but today I ha
On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 10:28:41 +0100
Yassine Chaouche wrote:
> Did you disable enable_original_recipient and have postfix <= 3.2 ?
> (I had to do this for a deduplication problem)
>
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#enable_original_recipient
>
> Yassine -- admin sysweb.
>
>
> Le 2/21/2
Le 2011-12-15 23:00, Nikolaos Milas a écrit :
Hello,
I am running dovecot-2.0.13-1_128.el5 x86_64 RPM on CentOS 5.7.
All accounts are virtual, hosted on LDAP Server.
My problem is that the command:
doveadm quota get -A
stopped listing all accounts. I think this problem started after I
cha
hi folks
hi timo
hi master of "Fu"
I just migrate my emails from one type of Maildir to Mailbox
I did as I was having problems reading speed with my webmail.
I did it in order to optimize when do you
my current config work for me
sincerely
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&sear
Le 2012-02-16 23:27, Morten Stevens a écrit :
Hi,
First, Timo, Thank you for Dovecot 2.1.0.
I've built Dovecot 2.1.0 RPMs including Dovecot-Pigeonhole 0.3.0 for
RHEL6, CentOS 6 and Scientific Linux 6.
If anyone is interested in testing these RPMs:
http://oss.imt-systems.com/mstevens/el6/doveco
hi guys
hi master of "Fu"
hi Timo
I am having problems to migrate to dovecot dovecot 2.0.18 to 2.1.1 I
encounter fatal errors.
I created it myself rpms available here
http://ns.fakessh.eu/rpms/dovecot-2.1.1-1.centme.el5.src.rpm
I can not run dovecot with this config file like this
http://ns.fake
Le samedi 25 février 2012 à 04:49 +0200, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> On 25.2.2012, at 4.42, ml wrote:
>
> > I am having problems to migrate to dovecot dovecot 2.0.18 to 2.1.1 I
> > encounter fatal errors.
>
> And what are the error messages?
>
2012-02-25 04:29:44i
Le samedi 25 février 2012 à 05:45 +0200, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> On 25.2.2012, at 5.32, ml wrote:
>
> > Le samedi 25 février 2012 à 04:49 +0200, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> >> On 25.2.2012, at 4.42, ml wrote:
> >>
> >>> I am having problems to mi
Le samedi 25 février 2012 à 07:18 +0200, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> On 25.2.2012, at 6.51, ml wrote:
>
> >> Try if it starts up without antispam plugin enabled? If not, gdb backtrace
> >> would be helpful: http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html
> >>
> >
>
Le samedi 25 février 2012 à 07:18 +0200, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> On 25.2.2012, at 6.51, ml wrote:
>
> >> Try if it starts up without antispam plugin enabled? If not, gdb backtrace
> >> would be helpful: http://dovecot.org/bugreport.html
> >>
> >
>
hello guys
hello master Timo
i build the last release of dovecot on my centos 5
work well and fine
but what the correct value for client limit
in
service auth { client_limit=6000 }
and
service anvil { client_limit=6000 }
my current dovecot -n
ks3 i386]# dovecot -n
# 2.1.1: /etc/dovecot/do
Le jeudi 15 mars 2012 à 16:53 +0200, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.2.tar.gz
> http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.2.tar.gz.sig
>
> There are a ton of proxying related improvements in this release. You
> should now be able to do pretty much anything y
Le 2012-04-20 09:40, Henrik Larsson a écrit :
This problem is still showing up every day in the logs.
I tried to delete the dovecot.index.search and
dovecot.index.search.uids files for all users, but the errors are
still there after a re-build of the search index with
"/usr/local/bin/doveadm sea
I'm not a developper so I can't do it by myself, but I wonder if it
could be possible to use tagSpam and tagNospam DSPAM feature to ehance
user's dspam lerning experience. I even don't know if this must be
done by DSPAM itself or by dovecot, but let me explain :
The feature would be done by
Le 21 avr. 08 à 13:58, Johannes Berg a écrit :
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 12:18 +0200, ML wrote:
I'm not a developper so I can't do it by myself,
# msgtag.spam
If this message was classified SPAM by mistake, please click here :
http://example.com/dspam-retrain.cgi?sig=
Le 21 avr. 08 à 12:49, Hugo Monteiro a écrit :
Never the less, it would be a nice idea, but i think you're
forgetting the technicalities. I assume that such http submission
would be authenticated. Do you want to nag your users constantly
with authentication popups, and windows opening,
a user complain about suddent disconnect error from time to time (he's
using pop3 with Apple Mail)
Looking at dovecot logs I discover that, each time the error shows up
for him, I have this :
dovecot: pop3[95137]: Info: user=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Disconnected
top=0/0, retr=0/0, del=0/4, siz
Le 23 avr. 08 à 14:15, Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 4/23/2008, ML ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
# dovecot.conf :
protocols: imap pop3 imaps pop3s
What version of dovecot?
%dovecot --version
1.0.13
Regards,
David.
Le 23 avr. 08 à 14:55, Charles Marcus a écrit :
On 4/23/2008, ML ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
# dovecot.conf :
protocols: imap pop3 imaps pop3s
What version of dovecot?
%dovecot --version
1.0.13
Hmmm... was your config file posted from output of dovecot -n? That
usually shows the
Le 26 sept. 08 à 15:46, Ron Wilhoite a écrit :
"Mailbox for $user is full - quota exceeded" or
"Mail storage for $user is full - quota exceeded"
$user is not desirable for us, we may have forward/redirect/rewrite
from an addresse to another and it is not desirable to show the actual
na
Hello,
I use dovecot + dspam and a very simple global sieve script :
require "fileinto";
if header :contains "X-DSPAM-Result" "Spam" {
fileinto "SPAM";
stop;
}
with dovecot 1.0 all run fine, but moving to 1.1 I experience this in
maillog :
Oct 13 10:31:52 h8h1 deliver([EMAIL
Le 13 oct. 08 à 10:45, ML a écrit :
Hello,
I use dovecot + dspam and a very simple global sieve script :
require "fileinto";
if header :contains "X-DSPAM-Result" "Spam" {
fileinto "SPAM";
stop;
}
Ok seem I need to use INBOX.SPAM inst
> > ># FullTextSearch
> > > fts = squat
> >
> > I'm probably talking out of the wrong hole again - but have you tried
> > removing squat from your plugin list to see if it makes a difference?
>
> Oh my god, load is down this morning. WOW.
>
> But what has changed?
Perhaps:
"The initial Squat
> * m...@eulberg.name :
>
> > > Oh my god, load is down this morning. WOW.
> > >
> > > But what has changed?
> >
> >
> > Perhaps:
> > "The initial Squat index building for large mailboxes can be very CPU and
> memory hungry." -> http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Squat
>
> Should that info be l
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> IMO, the best way to do high availability is to use an active/active
> cluster of any number of nodes you see fit to meet your performance
> and reliability needs. All hosts are live all the time and share he load.
> When one goes down client performance may simply drops a
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:23:45 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 6/29/2011 5:01 PM, m...@smtp.fakessh.eu wrote:
hello folks
hello Timo
I am facing a new problem
I'm using dovecot LDA to deliver the emails
now root of the system emails are delivered in the box to the letter
of the
postfix
directo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dear honorable doctor timo
reading the list I saw appear a new style for the "writing of INBOX".
namely this example
mailbox Drafts {
special_use = \Drafts
}
mailbox Junk {
special_use = \Junk
}
mailbox Sent {
specia
the recurring problems of these minor errors that often appear
timesmap. I almost successful make them disappear with an ultra clean
install. they appearing more generally for L INBOX Trash
Le 2012-08-01 19:58, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.9.tar.gz
http
Hi Timo
in the present work would be possible to walk to another folder for
deleted_to_trash
please answer me
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC2626742
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-key C2626742
http://about.me/fakessh
http://urlshort.eu fakessh @
http://gpl
I currently work this plugin with several folders
nice a documentation include
Le 2012-09-02 03:59, ml a écrit :
Hi Timo
in the present work would be possible to walk to another folder for
deleted_to_trash
please answer me
--
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xC262
Le 2012-09-03 02:18, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
On 2.9.2012, at 4.59, ml wrote:
in the present work would be possible to walk to another folder for
deleted_to_trash
I suppose, with some code modifications. But I'd prefer if nobody
used this plugin (or anything equivalent to its function
hello timo and other dev
after a precise reading of plugin deleted to trash
it appears to me like things more varariables are declared NULL in the
code.
it appears to me as being possible to achieve actions even if messages
with the same id appears several times in different INBOX
when it is th
Hi all, when hardening dovecot against the POODLE vulnerability,
we followed the advise to disable SSL2 and SSL3
but this is giving problems with some email clients (claws-mail).
ssl_protocols = !SSLv2 !SSLv3
results in the following error:
dovecot: pop3-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts in
Hi thanks for your help,
follows the doveconf -n output:
# 2.1.7: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32-042stab094.7 x86_64 Debian 7.7 simfs
auth_mechanisms = plain login
auth_verbose = yes
debug_log_path = /var/log/dovecot/debug.log
default_client_limit = 8192
default_process_limit = 204
Hi thanks for your help!
Trying to set your same parameters, when restarting dovecot, gives the
error:
doveconf: Fatal: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
line 136: Unknown setting: ssl_prefer_server_ciphers
doveconf: Error: managesieve-login: dump-capability process return
On 2015-01-09 08:34, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 1/9/2015 3:06 AM, Philipp Resch wrote:
It seems as if claws mail is preferring SSLv3
And since dovecot is really not affected by the poodle vulnerability,
if
you can't upgrade (I believe 2.2 is in the backports repo?), probably
easiest to just r
hi.
we're just trying to re-structure a system and want to use dovcots
submission-ability.
because the github-repository have no entry for any issues at all, we're
sending this feature-fequest to this ML.
unfortunately there doesn't seem to be any option to drop the
received-head
Am 03.01.22 um 15:47 schrieb Michael Peddemors:
> Using your email system IS the reason, simply make sure that you inform
no, it's not.
and:
> (SLA, Terms and Conditions etc) and it has a valid use, eg for security
> purposes.
for security_reasons it's completly ok, to store this informatio
> @others: due to the importance of it for us, I'm currently trying to
> implement it, but because that's my first deeper view in dovecots code,
> maybe I'll need some help.
okay, perhaps I've a solution for this.
because we're using standard-distribution-pkgs, we're checked it with
that version
Am 04.01.22 um 08:39 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
> We'll take a look at your patch. Can you please point out to some legal
> information about the Received header's GDPR incompliance, I would be
> interested to see it.
thanks for doing so.
the GDPR says about personal data:
- that only really neede
Am 05.01.22 um 17:23 schrieb Michael Kliewe:
> In Postfix many privacy-friendly submission servers do the following:
[...]
nice feature, unfortunately we're currently not using postfix, because
none here has enough experience with it. maybe later...
but:
> The Received-Header is still there
Am 05.01.22 um 18:00 schrieb John Fawcett:
> my understanding of the GDPR legislation is that it defines what is
> considered lawful processing. One of those items that makes the
> processing lawful is consent. If I send an email to a public mailing
> list I think it's fair to say that I am pro
Am 08.01.22 um 05:27 schrieb Dave McGuire:
> trying to mess with other peoples' stuff. I run fail2ban to catch those
> log entries and block the source IP address for a month on the first
> failed login. At any one time I have between 12,000 and 15,000
well, I don't know how _your_ users are
Am 08.01.22 um 17:22 schrieb Dave McGuire:
> I wasn't asking for a critique of my configuration; I explained my
> approach to a new user who came here looking for help.
huh?
well, I don't think that anyone wanted to say anything about _your_
configuration, but wanted to supplement, that you
Am 07.02.22 um 23:41 schrieb Jorge Bastos:
> I want postfix not to discard the message imediatly when a mailbox is
> full, i mean when postfix tries to deliver it to dovecot lmtp.
> Is it possible to change the behavior to something like what postfix
> does when he tries to deliver a message to
Hello,
I'm facing a problem with dsync : replication between my two dovecot
2.2.10 servers (10.10.10.10 = serverA and 10.10.10.11 = serverB) is not
done when a mail is received on any of the two servers.
Sync is correctly working when running "doveadm [-D] sync -A
tcp:10.10.10.10:12345" from s
Hello,
I'm trying to make quota work on my dovecot server.
I'm using prefetch userdb (source :
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/UserDatabase/Prefetch) with a database located
on a remote host :
passdb {
driver = sql
args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext
}
userdb {
driver = prefetch
}
user
fixed my problem.
Regards,
Cédric
Le 12/10/2016 à 08:53, Cédric ML a écrit :
Hello,
I'm trying to make quota work on my dovecot server.
I'm using prefetch userdb (source :
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/UserDatabase/Prefetch) with a database
located on a remote host :
passdb {
driv
Hello,
I'm trying to migrate mail accounts from an old dovecot 1.0.15 to a new
dovecot 2.2.26.
I've set up a master-user on old dovecot, and I run dsync on new server,
like this :
# doveadm -D -o mail_fsync=never sync -R -u u...@domain.tld imapc:
my u...@domain.tld looks like this (on the ne
hi Sami,
imapc_prefix is not a valid option.
but imapc_prefix_list="INBOX" is great ! It does the trick !
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Cédric
Le 07/12/2016 à 12:33, Sami Ketola a écrit :
On 7 Dec 2016, at 12.22, Cédric ML wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to migrate mail accounts from
Hello,
I'm trying to migrate mail accounts from an old server to a new one.
As I need to migrate dozens of accounts which take about 1G each, I need
to do stateful sync to make my migration in two times :
1 - I run a :
doveadm -D -o mail_fsync=never -o imapc_user=us...@olddomain.fr
sync -
Hello Timo,
"old server" is running dovecot 1.0.15, so I guess it it will not
support imapc_features=modseq...
Maybe it would be useful to add these prerequisites to dovecot wiki.
Regards,
Cédric
Le 20/03/2017 à 15:45, Timo Sirainen a écrit :
On 20 Mar 2017, at 13.24, Cédric
Hi,
On 30.10.2017 10:38, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
We need a server-side solution to the problem.
more powerfull hardware?
What's in your mind as solution?
Don't tell the client about the mails -> user will miss old mails.
Stop him from fetching body with a temporary "UNAVAILABLE" failure? ->
Morning all, I've managed to work my self into a corner and hoping someone
can help me out
I have OpenLDAP and Dovecot installed based on the following documents:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DovecotLDAP
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/OpenLDAPServer
When Dovecot is set up to log in
> John Fawcett schrieb:
>> Just a comment about the documentation for postfix integration when
>> using receipient delimiter and delivery of user+...@domain.ext to
>> u...@domain:
>>
>> http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix
>>
> Hi John, just for info, in my test server i use
>
> dovecot_destination
> Hi John,
> no i didnt wrote that, i only have u...@domain.ext
> layout in use currently in my test servers
>
> --
> Best Regards
>
> MfG Robert Schetterer
>
> Germany/Munich/Bavaria
>
Hi Robert
I probably didn't make it clear. The problem with the
published syntax is that it does not work for
rec
Hi,
We've a strange quota behavior on our dovecot servers.
It seems that it's somehow doubling the real used storage (or could be
something like twice the inbox size + size of other folders, hard to
know for sure).
It was initial setup with the maildir++ system. Now it's been configured
with di
On 08/09/2012 01:38, Daniel Parthey wrote:
Cibest ML wrote:
We've a strange quota behavior on our dovecot servers.
It seems that it's somehow doubling the real used storage (or could
be something like twice the inbox size + size of other folders, hard
to know for sure).
It was ini
On 09/09/2012 23:30, Daniel Parthey wrote:
Cibest ML wrote:
On 08/09/2012 01:38, Daniel Parthey wrote:
Cibest ML wrote:
We've a strange quota behavior on our dovecot servers.
It seems that it's somehow doubling the real used storage (or could
be something like twice the inbox size
On 11/09/2012 20:48, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 8.9.2012, at 18.07, Cibest ML wrote:
- Message delivered by LMTP
Quota name TypeValue Limit
User quota STORAGE 2653 524288
User quota MESSAGE 1 -
- quota recalc
Quota name TypeValue Limit
User quota STORAGE 5307 524288
User
On 12/09/2012 10:58, Cibest ML wrote:
On 11/09/2012 20:48, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 8.9.2012, at 18.07, Cibest ML wrote:
- Message delivered by LMTP
Quota name TypeValue Limit
User quota STORAGE 2653 524288
User quota MESSAGE 1 -
- quota recalc
Quota name TypeValue Limit
conf but doesn't count quota twice.
Anyway, after running a small script to recalc all the quota, everything
is now fine.
Thanks for you help
--
Regards
Sébastien
On 19/09/2012 14:47, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 19.9.2012, at 15.15, Cibest ML wrote:
There's one quite strange thing we&#
Hello,
I would like to know if it possible to have a dovecot IMAP proxy frontend where
CRAM-MD5 can be used as auth mechanism (assuming I would be using a master
user/password on the dovecot IMAP backend/mailbox)? I have read a few times the
following http://wiki2.dovecot.org/PasswordDatabase/E
that the IMAP backend (the mailbox server) in this case
scenario has to use PLAIN authentication and can NOT use CRAM-MD5?
Regards,ML
ser "nobody" in my mailbox SQL table.
Anyone has an idea?
Regards
ML
First of all:
doveconf -n
# 2.2.9: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 x86_64 Debian 7.7 ext4
auth_mechanisms = plain login
disable_plaintext_auth = no
mail_debug = yes
mail_gid = vmail
mail_location = maildir:/home/vmail/domains/%d/%n
mail_plugins = " quota"
mail_temp_dir = /var/t
Il 28/10/2014 08:41, Steffen Kaiser ha scritto:
[...]
Thanks a lot for the answer.
> What value is in the LDAP attribute, with our without the pending 'S'?
The value in LDAP is WITH the pending S, because at the moment we have a
"courier situation" and the quota value need the S.
We want to migrat
Some information about maildir++ that I have read:
http://www.inter7.com/courierimap/README.maildirquota.html
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Quota/Maildir
When I have to deliver a message with an MDA I can use dovecot-lda.
If I have enabled "quota = maildir:User quota" I am pretty sure that in
the mail
2) should be safer although it is using PLAIN auth
mechanism. Of course I would always use STARTTLS and not allow unencrypted
connection.
What is your opinion?
Best,
ML
is quite annoying as
the mail then stays in the Spam folder and can not been re-learnt has ham.
Best regards
ML
tener {
port = 12345
}
}
service imap {
process_limit = 4096
}
service lmtp {
inet_listener lmtp {
port = 24
}
}
service quota-warning {
executable = script /usr/local/bin/quota-warning.sh
unix_listener quota-warning {
user = vmail
}
user = vmail
}
ssl_cert = wrote:
On 01/14/2015 03:05 PM, ML
generated this error due
to the size of the mail?
Regards
ML
On Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:29 AM, Steffen Kaiser
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 15 Jan 2015, ML mail wrote:
It would be better to have the original question & discussion at the top,
so one c
spammer who abuses this limit by attaching a big image...
Regards
ML
On Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:23 PM, ML mail wrote:
Thank you for your helpful hints on debugging this issue. I wanted first to get
the mail which generates this error but unfortunately the user already deleted
it as
the mailbox server can be found here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.dovecot/80823
Regards
ML
on my side which is
too low or is it just an aborted connection from the side of the IMAP client?
The configuration on my Dovecot mailbox server can be found here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.dovecot/80823
It is a Debian 7 box with standard debian packages.
Best regards
ML
BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 30 Jan 2015, ML mail wrote:
> I was checking the errors on my mailbox server using "doveadm log errors" and
> found that around 2-3 times a day I get the following error:
>
> Jan 29 22:14:43 auth: Error: auth worker: Aborte
ction reset by peer
maybe around 20-30 per day.
On Friday, January 30, 2015 9:28 AM, ML mail wrote:
Hello,
I was checking the errors on my mailbox server using "doveadm log errors" and
found that around 2-3 times a day I get the following error:
Jan 29 22:14:43 auth: Error: auth
Thanks for your tip regarding the busy network.
I am using a one year old Cisco Catalyst 2960S (WS-C2960S-48TD-L) with cat6e
cables and my network should not be overloaded as far as I know. My mailbox and
mail proxy servers are on two different virtual machines on two different
servers. It coul
s
I do not really understand how from time to time DNS queries are slow, I tried
replicate this issue using dig to resolve the same DNS entry and it was always
very fast. Is there any way I can debug better this issue? or is this nothing
to worry about really?
Regards
ML
the way.
I am not running a local DNS cache on the server. As suggested using a local
DNS cache would simply fix this issue but I am more interested to know what is
generating these slow DNS queries...
On Wednesday, February 4, 2015 2:59 PM, LuKreme wrote:
On 04 Feb 2015, at 03:38 , ML mail
our query
frankly "I see around 5-6 times per day the following warning" as reason
for writing a mail and continue insist the problem is on your side shows
missing network understanding
Am 04.02.2015 um 17:48 schrieb ML mail:
> Thanks for your comments. I understand as DNS us
93 matches
Mail list logo
